Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
0 comments 
Proposal announced by city and state in New York creates a new tax on luxury second homes above $5 million, targets billionaires and non-resident investors and could raise at least $500 million per year to strengthen services like free daycare, urban cleaning, and security.
New York has opened a new front in the battle for the money that keeps the city running. Instead of tightening the screws on those who live, work, and pay taxes every day, the city and state government announced a proposal to charge more from billionaires, global millionaires, and luxury property owners who use the city as a showcase and store of value, but not as a home.
The measure was presented on April 15, 2026, by Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Governor Kathy Hochul.
The target is the idle luxury in a city that is too expensive
The proposal creates the first tax of its kind in the state of New York on high-end residential properties that are not the owner’s primary residence.
-
IMF raises global alarm by projecting public debt to reach 100% of GDP by 2029, a level not seen since the post-World War II era, which could hinder growth, limit spending, and reduce the capacity to respond to crises worldwide.
-
Starting this Wednesday, families with an income of up to R$ 13,000 can finance properties of up to R$ 600,000 through Minha Casa, Minha Vida with interest rates below the market, and experts say that the middle class is the biggest beneficiary of the new program rules.
-
The dollar fell below R$ 5, and the real became the currency that appreciated the most in the world in 2026, with a rise of 10.4%, but experts warn that one factor could reverse everything still this year.
-
Brazil becomes the darling of foreigners in 2026 with billions entering the stock market, but South Korea surges over 55% and takes the global lead among emerging markets.
The focus is on second homes valued at $5 million or more within the city, including luxury apartments, co-ops, and family homes owned by those living outside of New York.
The political message was straightforward: those who profit from the weight, prestige, and infrastructure of the city will also have to help pay the bill.
The plan promises $500 million per year to secure services
The figure that put the proposal at the center of the debate was clear: at least $500 million annually in recurring revenue.
The money would serve as a boost during a time of fiscal pressure and help protect public services that impact the daily lives of those living in the city.
The Associated Press reported that the measure comes amid a budget shortfall estimated at around $5 billion, while the governor’s office states that the new charge would prevent placing that burden on ordinary residents.
The political package behind the proposal was also marketed with a clear destination. In transcripts and statements from the mayor’s office, members of the Mamdani administration linked the new taxation to services like free daycare, cleaner streets, and safer neighborhoods, trying to turn a tax dispute into a concrete response to the cost of living in New York.
Who is in the sights in New York
The charge was not designed to target the resident living in the property as their primary residence.
According to the terms released by the state government, the tax would apply to luxury properties that are not occupied as a primary residence, nor rented to a primary resident, nor used by the owner’s family as a primary residence.
In practice, the target is million-dollar properties owned by non-residents who take advantage of the symbolic and financial value of New York without contributing at the same level to the services that sustain the city.
Billionaires, global elite, and empty properties enter the center of the dispute
The debate has become even more explosive because it touches on an old discomfort in New York: expensive towers, extremely costly apartments, and vacant units in a city where space, housing, and budgets are under pressure.
The city government classified the proposal as a historic step to close the fiscal gap without attacking workers, while supporters in the City Council defended the measure as a sensible way to fund vital services.
The battle now leaves the headlines and enters heavy politics
Despite the announcement, the charge still depends on formal progress in Albany and negotiations in the state budget.
Hochul presented the measure as an alternative to broader income or corporate tax increases, but the proposal has already encountered political resistance and promises to become yet another war between the rhetoric of tax justice and the fear of driving large fortunes away from the city’s real estate market.
If passed, New York will not only be creating a new fee. It will be sending a strong message to the top of the market: owning a piece of the most desirable address in the United States without living in it may cease to be a silent privilege and become a billion-dollar obligation with a direct impact on the services that keep the city running.
Comment on what you think of this proposal and share this article with those who follow politics, economics, and the real estate market in New York.
Seja o primeiro a reagir!