1. Home
  2. / Interesting facts
  3. / The 60-meter crane that was supposed to be temporary remained for almost 20 years in the historic center of Florence, turned into a metallic monster, and exposed a project that seemed never-ending.
Reading time 4 min of reading Comments 0 comments

The 60-meter crane that was supposed to be temporary remained for almost 20 years in the historic center of Florence, turned into a metallic monster, and exposed a project that seemed never-ending.

Written by Flavia Marinho
Published on 22/05/2026 at 18:55
Be the first to react!
React to this article

The removal of the 60-meter crane in Florence ends almost 20 years of visual discomfort in the historic center. The structure installed for works at the Uffizi Galleries became a symbol of bureaucracy, stalled construction, and conflict between modern construction and historical heritage. The case shows how something temporary can mark for decades one of Italy’s most famous tourist landscapes

The 60-meter crane that was supposed to serve only one construction project remained stuck in the historic center of Florence for almost 20 years. The structure was installed in 2006, near the Uffizi Galleries, and ended up becoming one of the most curious symbols of endless construction in Italy.

The information was published by The Guardian, a British newspaper of international news and culture. The modern structure began to share space with historic buildings, artworks, and a landscape linked to the Renaissance, creating a contrast hard to ignore.

Over the years, the equipment ceased to be seen merely as part of the construction. It gained fame as a metallic monster, became a target of public irritation, and came to represent the delay of a project that seemed never to end.

Structure installed in 2006 became a symbol of stalled construction in the heart of Florence

The crane was placed to assist in works related to the Uffizi Galleries, one of Florence’s most well-known cultural spaces. Its function was to lift materials during the initial phase of the museum’s expansion.

But time passed, the work dragged on, and the machine remained in the same place. What was supposed to be a temporary presence stayed for almost 20 years in the urban landscape.

In an ordinary city, this would already attract attention. In Florence, the impact was even greater, because the city receives visitors in search of art, history, and architectural beauty.

Metallic monster contrasted with one of Italy’s most famous landscapes

The nickname metal monster arose because the crane completely clashed with the surrounding environment. The steel structure appeared over rooftops, squares, and historical buildings.

The landscape of Florence is known worldwide for its connection to the Renaissance. Therefore, a construction machine with 60 meters caused visual and symbolic discomfort.

The problem was not just the existence of the crane. The most sensitive point was its permanence. A construction structure can be accepted for some time, but almost 20 years turned the equipment into an unwanted part of the city.

The removal of the 60-meter crane in Florence ends almost 20 years of visual discomfort in the historic center.
The removal of the 60-meter crane in Florence ends almost 20 years of visual discomfort in the historic center.

Bureaucracy, costs, and permissions delayed the removal of the crane

The removal of the crane was hindered by factors that often stall public and cultural works. The cost of dismantling and the need for authorizations helped prolong the structure’s permanence.

In historical areas, any intervention requires care. This makes simple decisions slower, especially when they involve heritage, safety, and different authorities.

The case of Florence shows how a construction project can get out of control when a temporary solution remains for too long. The equipment installed to help gradually became the biggest sign of delay.

Uffizi Galleries spent years linked to a project that seemed endless

The Uffizi Galleries are associated with some of the most important works of Italian art. Even so, for almost 20 years, part of the visual attention of the region was taken by a giant crane.

Uffizi Galleries spent years linked to a project that seemed endless
Uffizi Galleries spent years linked to a project that seemed endless

The Guardian, British newspaper of international news and culture, recorded the statement of Simone Verde, director of the galleries. “Florence has been waiting for this moment for a long time,” said Verde.

The phrase sums up the symbolic weight of the removal. For the city, dismantling the crane means more than removing a machine. It means relieving a visual mark that lingered too long over a historic area.

Removal restores strength to the historic landscape and leaves a warning for other cities

The removal of the 60-meter crane changes how the historic center of Florence will be seen by residents and tourists. The structure will no longer compete for attention with ancient facades, squares, and monuments.

This type of case serves as a warning for cities that depend on tourism and cultural preservation. When a construction project is stalled or too slow, the impact appears in the landscape and also in the public image of the place.

A temporary intervention can become a permanent problem when there is no quick solution. In Florence, the crane went from being a construction tool to a symbol of bureaucracy.

A construction machine became an urban character before leaving the scene

For almost 20 years, the crane was part of Florence’s skyline. Not as a monument, but as a visible reminder of a construction that took too long to progress.

The case draws attention precisely because it combines rare elements in the same story: a historic city, a famous museum, a giant machine, and a construction that seemed never-ending.

The removal ends a long phase of discomfort in the historic center of Florence. The metal monster leaves the scene but raises an important question about planning, care for heritage, and control of constructions in sensitive areas.

When a temporary structure remains for almost 20 years in a historic city, is it still part of the construction or has it become part of the problem? Leave your opinion in the comments and share this post.

Sign up
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
most recent
older Most voted
Built-in feedback
View all comments
Tags
Flavia Marinho

Flavia Marinho is a postgraduate engineer with extensive experience in the onshore and offshore shipbuilding industry. In recent years, she has dedicated herself to writing articles for news websites in the areas of military, security, industry, oil and gas, energy, shipbuilding, geopolitics, jobs, and courses. Contact flaviacamil@gmail.com or WhatsApp +55 21 973996379 for corrections, editorial suggestions, job vacancy postings, or advertising proposals on our portal.

Share in apps
0
I'd love to hear your opinion, please comment.x