Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
Researchers Show That Soot Would Block The Sun, Decrease Corn Production For Years And Raise Radiation, Worsening The Global Food Crisis
Scientists from Pennsylvania State University released an alarming study about the consequences of a nuclear war. According to the research, the effects would go far beyond the areas hit by the bombs, due to what is known as nuclear winter.
The phenomenon, described as catastrophic, would trigger a prolonged global cooling, devastating agricultural production worldwide and causing hunger on an unprecedented scale.
According to the researchers, the smoke and soot from firestorms would block sunlight. This would reduce temperature and agricultural productivity for more than a decade.
-
For the first time, scientists created a “time crystal” visible to the naked eye using liquid crystals and blue light, paving the way for new technology.
-
The Brazilian watch that NASA chose for the wrists of the four Artemis II astronauts around the Moon — and the company that beat global competition is located in São Paulo.
-
New satellite images show a growing lava dome at the Shiveluch volcano, one of the world’s most active, which is in continuous eruption.
-
The trains in the Netherlands have 2,000-watt laser cannons that vaporize leaves at 5,000 °C on the tracks — and England invented the technology, but gave up on it in 2002.
Hunger would spread even among those who survived the initial impact of the explosions.
Focus On The Most Planted Crop In The World
The study, published in Environmental Research Letters, simulated the effects of nuclear winter on global corn production, the most widely grown cereal on the planet.
The scientists conducted six simulations, varying the severity of the conflicts and the amount of soot released into the atmosphere.
In a large-scale nuclear war scenario, there would be 165 million tons of soot in the air. This would cause an 80% drop in annual corn production.
Even in a regional conflict, with 5.5 million tons of soot, global production would fall by 7%.
Radiation And Ozone Destruction
The problem would not be limited to a lack of sunlight. A nuclear war would also increase UV-B radiation.
The explosions would generate nitrogen oxides in the stratosphere, destroying the ozone layer. Without this protective layer, more radiation would reach the surface, harming photosynthesis and damaging plant tissues.
According to scientist Yuning Shi, this peak in UV-B radiation would occur between six and seven years after the conflict.
The result would be an additional 7% drop in corn production, exacerbating the food crisis.
Slow And Difficult Recovery
The research indicates that global corn production could take seven to 12 years to return to pre-nuclear war levels.
The recovery would depend on adaptation strategies, such as planting varieties resistant to lower temperatures and shorter growing periods.
The use of these crops could increase global food production by up to 10% compared to common strains.
However, the limited availability of seeds would pose a bottleneck for large-scale adaptation.
To address this scenario, the researchers suggest the creation of “agricultural resilience kits.” These kits would contain resilient seeds that could be planted immediately after a catastrophe.
Armen Kemanian, who led the development of the simulations, says the kits would help maintain food production in the unstable years following a nuclear conflict.
The idea, he says, could also be applied to other large-scale disasters.
Shi emphasizes that preparation is key: “If we want to survive, we must be prepared, even for unimaginable consequences.”
Nuclear Threat On The Rise
The study was released at a time of increasing tension in the international arena. In May, Pakistan’s Defense Minister, Khawaja Asif, stated that the threat of nuclear war was “clear and present” amidst rising tensions with India.
In early August, former President Donald Trump said he ordered two nuclear submarines to approach Russia.
The measure was a response to statements by Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council, during the conflict with Ukraine.
In June, the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, warned of the risk of a “nuclear holocaust.”
She stated that increasingly volatile international policies were bringing the world closer to nuclear annihilation than ever before.
Nuclear Threat On The Rise
In a video recorded after visiting Hiroshima, destroyed by an atomic bomb in 1945, Gabbard stated that “hawkish” political leaders were fueling fear and tensions among nuclear powers.
The warning from Penn State scientists reinforces this concern. The impacts of a nuclear conflict would not be limited to immediate destruction but would extend for years, jeopardizing food security and threatening billions of lives.
In this scenario, preparation, international cooperation, and conflict prevention become not just political issues, but a global survival necessity.
With information from NYPost.
-
1 person reacted to this.