English 
Spanish 
4 min read
89 comments
Scientists discover gas 3.500 times more powerful than CO2. This 'deadly' synthetic gas is present in many homes around the world. Understand how the synthetic gas more powerful than CO2 is scaring researchers.
Gas 3.500 times more powerful than CO2: A new threat is alarming scientists around the world: HFC-125, a highly harmful synthetic gas, is gaining prominence in climate studies. Recent data obtained by satellites reveal an alarming increase in its concentration in the atmosphere, configuring a true explosion that worries experts. This deadly synthetic gas, widely used in refrigeration systems and as a substitute for substances that destroy the ozone layer, has a global warming potential thousands of times greater than carbon dioxide (CO2).
Their growing presence could significantly worsen existing climate problems, contributing to rising global temperatures and intensifying extreme weather events. Scientists warn that urgent measures are needed to mitigate their impact and regulate their use before the damage is irreversible.
Understand the concern behind the gas 3.500 times more powerful than CO2
Hydrofluorocarbons, of which HFC-125 is a member, were initially designed to replace CFCs, which are responsible for ozone depletion. Although they have no impact on the ozone layer, their effect on global warming is alarming. As a gas 3.500 times more potent than CO2 over 100 years in terms of global warming potential, HFC-125 is a significant heat trap.
- US scientists create strongest ever armor material with 100 trillion bonds
- Bracell Uses Cutting-Edge Technology to Fight Wildfires and Protect the Environment
- No Volkswagen, Toyota or BYD: Brazil's most modern automotive factory belongs to the company that is often overlooked by Brazilians
- Iron Dome: The incredible invisible wall that protects Israel from thousands of missiles and revolutionizes global defense
Used primarily in air conditioning systems, refrigerators and fire extinguishers, the deadly synthetic gas is released into the atmosphere through industrial emissions. Its chemical stability makes it a persistent gas, remaining in the atmosphere for several decades.
For the first time, a team from Waterloo University, in collaboration with the Canadian Space Agency, measured the concentration of this synthetic gas, which is more powerful than CO2, in space. The ACE-FTS satellite, in orbit since 2004, provided accurate data between 11 and 25 kilometers (around 7 to 15,5 miles) in altitude.
Measures taken to prevent deadly synthetic gas
The results of the measurements are impressive and, in just two decades, the levels of the synthetic gas more powerful than CO2 have increased 10-fold. This rapid increase reflects the growing demand for cooling technologies, particularly in emerging countries where such equipment is becoming commonplace.
The climate impact of the gas, 3.500 times more powerful than CO2, is not limited to its mere presence. By capturing infrared radiation, it intensifies the greenhouse effect and directly contributes to the rise in global average temperatures.
To address this trend, the international community adopted the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol. This agreement aims to gradually reduce the production and use of deadly synthetic gas while promoting more environmentally friendly alternatives.
However, scientists stress that the effectiveness of these measures depends on their rapid and widespread implementation. Without immediate action, concentrations of the synthetic gas more powerful than CO2 will continue to rise, threatening to worsen an already fragile climate.
If regulations prove effective, as they have been for CFCs, scientists expect to see a gradual decline in the gas over the next few years. But time is of the essence to combat its effects and avoid irreversible climate disruption.
Understand what Global Warming Potential (GWP) is
Global warming potential (GWP) measures the impact of a greenhouse gas on global warming. It compares a molecule's ability to retain heat in atmosphere relative to carbon dioxide (CO2), which serves as a baseline.
This value is calculated over a specific period, usually 20, 100 or 500 years. For example, in the context of this study, a GWP of 3.500 means that the deadly synthetic gas traps 3.500 times more heat than the same amount of CO2 over 100 years.
Gases with high GWP values, such as HFC-125, are of particular concern. Their long lifetimes amplify their impact, as they persist in the atmosphere for decades or even centuries. By accounting for GWP, international regulations such as the Kigali Amendment aim to reduce the use of these substances to limit their contribution to global warming.
I always wanted to understand the role of human beings within the ecosystem after the formation/creation of the world, now I understand that human beings are the trigger for the destruction of the planet, so that the perfect cycle of creation โ destruction is fulfilledโฆ
Destruction of the planet? Human beings will cease to exist, with or without oxygen they will continue to exist, the planet will remain there and will continue to exist, those of us who need it and not the other way around, the ones who are destroying what is needed will cease to exist, the human species and others may or may not come, but the planet continues lol
The planet just transforms
Negative! Men, due to a lack of planning and foresight of the โmistakesโ they will make, are changing the Earthโs scenario.
Have mercy my God ๐ญ
CO2 is not deadly, plants breathe CO2 at night. You exhale CO2 when you breathe, it is part of the composition of the atmosphere, of the air we breathe.
stop demonizing CO2, we need this gas to survive on the planet.
And you say that CO2 is not such a bad idea. Meanwhile, researchers have just discovered HFC-125, a synthetic gas 3500 times more powerful than COXNUMX, and our refrigeration systems are releasing this 'monster' everywhere. Anyone who is unaware of this situation, please open your eyes!
Carbon dioxide (CO2) or carbon dioxide is part of the planet's atmosphere, and as Felipe said, it is necessary for life, since plants convert it to oxygen in the process of photosynthesis. Carbon monoxide is the danger, it is toxic, this gas is emitted by the combustion of automobile fuel, among other things. The article is wrong when it compares synthetic gas with CO2, saying that HFC is more deadly than CO2, even though the latter is not toxic.
Yes, carbon dioxide (COโ) is dangerous to the environment when emitted in large quantities, especially due to its role in worsening the greenhouse effect. COโ is a gas naturally present in the atmosphere and essential for processes such as photosynthesis. However, human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas), deforestation and industrial production have significantly increased concentrations of this gas in the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution.
Why is too much COโ harmful?
Greenhouse Gas Increase: COโ is a greenhouse gas, meaning it traps heat in the atmosphere. In balanced amounts, this effect is natural and necessary to keep the Earth habitable. However, uncontrolled increases in COโ intensify global warming, resulting in severe climate change.
Climate Impacts: Rising global temperatures have serious consequences, such as melting glaciers, rising sea levels, extreme weather events (droughts, storms and floods) and changes in rainfall patterns.
Ocean Acidification: About 25% of the COโ emitted is absorbed by the oceans. This process forms carbonic acid, which reduces the pH of seawater, negatively impacting marine ecosystems such as coral reefs and sensitive species such as molluscs.
Loss of Biodiversity: Global warming and changes in habitats caused by excess COโ put the survival of several species at risk, altering entire ecosystems.
So it is necessary to plant the forests back in time and not look for solutions to replace one gas with another.
I've seen many cases of people dying because they lit a barbecue in their room to keep warm.
Yes, Josรฉ, it happens a lot during cold weather, when humble people, without having anything to cover themselves, create ways to warm themselves, with candles, barbecues, alcohol, oil lamps. The problem is that in closed environments, fire consumes oxygen very quickly and also releases carbon dioxide, which leads most people in these situations to death by asphyxiation, because as soon as it reaches a certain concentration of carbon dioxide, it acts as a sedative, which prevents victims from waking up or calling for help.
In this case it was just natural selection taking its course. Every idea that people come up with.
They died because of carbon monoxide and not CO2.
No Andrรฉ, they are not wrong because they want you to understand that carbon dioxide increases global temperatures through the greenhouse effect, the gas retains excess heat that should return to outer space, but carbon dioxide retains it on the planet, and this refrigeration gas is worse than that because it retains even more heat, thus increasing the greenhouse effect even more.
It is not toxic, but deadly if in excess.
And the hotter it gets, the more this gas will be produced, with the use of greater quantities of refrigeration.
As the problem of global warming worsens, scientists have become concerned about the threat that has been posed by the hydrofluorocarbon gas HFC-125. This is a synthetic compound with a warming potential 3.500 times greater than that of carbon dioxide (CO2). Research has revealed that the concentration of this gas in the atmosphere is increasing significantly. To better describe these studies and understand how this gas appears, it is necessary to first analyze the impact caused by CO2 in the atmosphere, considering the role of one of its main โenemiesโ that was designed, in the past, to be a solution to climate problems. In the 1970s, two experts in environmental sciences identified the need to create substances that could replace the chlorofluorocarbons responsible for the significant destruction of the ozone layer in the atmosphere that, in the distant past, took place several decades ago in some regions of the globe. To solve this problem, they found (or โcreatedโ) hydrofluorocarbons โ HFC-125, one of which! When it was found that hydrofluorocarbons have a lower capacity to cause damage to the ozone layer, it was discovered that this same gas had a shuttering effect on its level of global warming!
Yeah! The article is about a gas and ILLUSTRATIVELY, it mentions another gas and those who can't read properly end up making bizarre comments. Hugs!!!
I understand your concern, but there has been a misinterpretation of the article. Its purpose seems to be somewhat disconnected from reality. This article discusses the secret of a highly harmful synthetic gas, HFC-125, which can damage the ozone layer and is far more dangerous than CO2 in terms of climate impact. You may want to review the article to better understand this topic. Thank you for comparing.
So breathe it in๐
What nonsense, do you think scientists don't know this and you were the one who discovered it? The problem is the excess CO2. Go study before commenting **** on the internet.
Wrong! Plants use CO2 during the day! They release CO2 at night because they breathe. Go study!
This one is lethal, HFC-125, a synthetic gas 3500.
The article is about HFC-125 gas, a synthetic gas. Illustratively, it is 3.500 times more intense (+) than CO2 gas.
Go fishing. Go fishing. Go fishingโฆ