Coca-Cola announced the closure of the Ventura plant in California, which had been operating for 114 years. According to information released by the NSC portal, the unit will cease activities on July 10 of this year, affecting 85 workers, of whom 68 will be relocated to other facilities. Operations will be transferred to units in Southern California, and the closure is the third by the bottler Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling in less than 12 months.
The decision was made by Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling, a subdivision of Reyes Holding responsible for bottling and distributing Coca-Cola products in 10 American states. When the closure will happen: on July 10 of this year, with formal notification to the authorities sent on Friday (8). How the transition will be made: of the 85 employees affected, 68 will be relocated to other company facilities, and the others may apply for positions at other Coca-Cola factories. Why the plant will be closed: according to the company, the decision was made after regular evaluations of facilities and services to ensure sustainable business growth, and the transfer of operations to larger units in Southern California aims to better position the company for the long term.
The Ventura plant is not the first to close in this restructuring process. At the end of December, Coca-Cola closed a unit in American Canyon, in the San Francisco Bay Area, affecting 45 workers. Before that, in June, Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling also closed its unit in Salinas. Three plants closed in less than a year indicate that the bottler is consolidating operations in larger and more efficient units, a move that reduces fixed costs but eliminates jobs in smaller communities.
114 years of operation: what the Ventura plant represented
The plant that Coca-Cola will close in Ventura had been operating for more than a century. It has 114 years of continuous production that made the unit one of the oldest in operation in the brand’s bottling chain in the United States. For the local community, the plant was not just an employer: it was part of Ventura’s economic and cultural identity, a presence that spanned two world wars, the Great Depression, oil crises, and pandemics.
-
A proposal advancing in Congress may suspend the driver’s license of those who drive using smart glasses with artificial intelligence, imposes a very serious fine multiplied by five, and revocation of the license in case of recurrence, and the text has already been approved by a committee of the Chamber of Deputies.
-
Lages Shopping Center, the only one in the Serra region of SC, is purchased by a São Paulo investment fund after the previous group accumulated a debt of R$ 650 million and saw a package of shopping centers go to auction without a buyer in the initial stages.
-
Meat giant based in Itajaí, owner of Sadia, Perdigão, and Qualy, starts 2026 with a profit of R$ 111 million and sees poultry and pork exports advancing to Europe, Asia, and the Middle East following a rise in global demand for proteins.
-
With the new law, drivers and MEIs will have 6 months to start paying for a 90,000 car in 72 installments.
Closing a unit with this history is not a trivial decision, even for a corporation the size of Coca-Cola. The company recognized the importance of the moment by communicating directly to employees before the public announcement and by sending the WARN notification 60 days in advance, as required by American law for mass layoffs. The formality of the process reflects both respect for the factory’s history and the certainty that the decision is irreversible.
85 workers affected: who stays and who goes
Of the 85 employees impacted by the closure of the Coca-Cola plant in Ventura, 68 will be relocated to other company facilities. This means that most workers will keep their jobs but will need to move to units in Southern California, which may involve changing cities, longer commutes, and adapting to a new routine. For professionals with established families in Ventura, relocation can be as disruptive as a layoff.
The remaining 17 employees will be able to apply for positions at other Coca-Cola plants, with no guarantee of hiring. The difference between being relocated and having to apply for a position is significant: in the first case, the job is assured, in the second, it depends on availability, profile, and competition with other candidates. The company did not detail which criteria determine who gets relocation and who remains a candidate, but in such processes, factors like length of service, role, and proximity to other units usually weigh in.
Three plants in less than a year: the consolidation pattern
The closure of Ventura is not an isolated event but part of a pattern that Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling has been executing in California. In June of last year, the company closed the Salinas unit. In December, it shut down the American Canyon plant in the San Francisco Bay area, affecting 45 workers. Now, in July, it will be Ventura’s turn. Three units closed in approximately 12 months, all in the same state.
The pattern indicates a deliberate consolidation strategy, where smaller and older units are absorbed by larger and more modern facilities. Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling operates 22 distribution centers in California, including two production centers in Los Angeles, in addition to 50 facilities in 10 states. With this infrastructure, the company can absorb the production volume of smaller units without losing market service capacity. For the corporation, it’s optimization. For the cities losing the plants, it’s economic depletion.
What is Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling
Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling is a subdivision of Reyes Holding, a conglomerate that manages large beer and beverage distributors and is also the largest global distributor for McDonald’s. Reyes Holding began distributing Coca-Cola products in 2015 and officially formed Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling as a business unit in 2022. The company operates 50 facilities in 10 American states, which gives an idea of the operational scale behind the brand that consumers see on the shelf.
The bottling structure of Coca-Cola in the United States is decentralized: the brand licenses production and distribution to regional bottlers that operate semi-autonomously. Reyes is one of these bottlers and makes its own decisions about which plants to keep and which to close, based on operational efficiency and logistics criteria. When Reyes closes a plant in California, it is not necessarily a decision from Coca-Cola’s headquarters in Atlanta, but a choice by the local bottler to optimize its network.
Inflation and efficiency: the context behind the closures
The closures of Coca-Cola plants in California occur in a context of persistent inflation in the United States and pressure for operational efficiency across the beverage industry. The cost of keeping century-old units operational tends to be higher than that of modern plants, both due to building maintenance issues and technological limitations that prevent full automation of processes. Consolidating production in larger and newer units allows for reduced unit costs and maintaining margins in a market where consumer prices face resistance.
California also presents some of the highest operational costs in the United States, with expensive energy, high taxes, and strict labor regulations. For a bottler operating in 10 states, maintaining three small plants in California may be less efficient than concentrating production in two large units and distributing the product through an already existing logistics network. The business logic is clear, even if the consequences for workers and local communities are painful.
A 114-year-old factory that will not see its 115th anniversary
Coca-Cola will close the Ventura plant in July, a unit with 114 years of history that employed 85 people. The decision is part of a consolidation that has already closed two other units in California in less than a year, and operations will be absorbed by larger facilities in the southern part of the state. For 68 workers, there is relocation. For the other 17, there is hope for a position in another plant. For Ventura, there remains the absence of a century-old presence that will not be replaced.
What do you think about a company closing a factory with more than a century of operation? Tell us in the comments if you believe that the consolidation of factories is inevitable in the current scenario, how you evaluate the impact on communities that lose production units, and if Coca-Cola should have kept the Ventura plant for its historical value. We want to hear your opinion.

Be the first to react!