English 
Spanish 
4 min read
19 comments
Amazon has decided to end remote work and bring employees back to the office. However, it is facing logistical challenges due to lack of space to accommodate all employees, resulting in a postponement.
One of the world's largest companies is facing a dilemma that seems straight out of a corporate comedy.
Despite having announced the end of remote work and determined the full return of employees to the offices, Amazon faces a basic logistical problem: there simply isn't enough space to accommodate all of its employees in its offices.
This situation, which may seem absurd at first glance, has generated repercussions inside and outside the company.
- Brazil is now the country with the highest taxes in the world after a controversial tax reform that divides economists, politicians and scares the population
- Kabum offers dozens of home office and in-person vacancies for professionals from all over Brazil
- Have you ever thought about earning R$6.500 to work from Monday to Friday, from 07am to 17pm? Grupo Nolasco is offering an Analyst job vacancy for professionals with a completed higher education degree!
- How about working in Portugal? Job vacancies in Portugal are open and offer salaries of up to 2 thousand euros!
The decision to end home office was announced with the goal of returning to in-person work from January 2, 2025.
However, according to Business Insider, the initial planning had to be changed.
The current forecast is that the full return will only happen in May 2025 due to the need for adjustments in offices located in cities such as New York, Atlanta, Houston, Austin, Dallas and Phoenix.
For most employees, working conditions will remain the same until the spaces are properly prepared.
Infrastructure changes
An Amazon spokesperson said the delays stem from reconfigurations in buildings designed to accommodate hybrid workers, not a shortage of physical space.
Still, the current situation reflects long-standing challenges faced by the company.
When the hybrid work model was implemented in 2023, the capacity of the offices was also insufficient to accommodate the increase in people.
Employees reported difficulties such as a lack of desks, meeting rooms and even spaces to have lunch comfortably.
To address these challenges, Amazon has had to adjust its internal tools, including a room reservation system that assesses whether space utilization is actually necessary.
Even with these measures, the restructuring of the offices was not completed on time, which led to the postponement of the full return.
Employee resistance
According to newspaper Estadão, the decision to end home office has been the target of criticism from employees, who claim that remote work provides greater flexibility and does not compromise productivity.
Some also speculate that the move is part of a strategy to reduce staff, something Amazon vehemently denies.
The dissatisfaction is not new. Since 2023, when the company determined that employees would have to be in the office at least three times a week, employees have shown discontent, even organizing strikes and protests.
The official justification, according to CEO Andy Jassy, is that Face-to-face work is essential to reinforce team culture and promote collaboration among employees.
Global impacts
The challenges facing Amazon reflect a broader trend in the corporate sector.
Large companies around the world are struggling to balance the return to in-person work with employee expectations for more flexible models.
In the case of Amazon, this situation is aggravated by the size of its workforce: more than 350 people are employed globally.
Meanwhile, the corporate real estate market is also facing difficulties. Many cities have not yet managed to adapt to the demands of large companies, especially after the pandemic.
Giants like Amazon have considered alternatives such as renting spaces in coworking spaces, including WeWork units, to make up for the lack of their own offices.
Amazon faces strikes in the United States
At the same time that Amazon is dealing with the return to in-person, workers providing services to the company in the United States staged strikes at seven facilities.
According to the Teamsters union, which represents some of the employees, the strike is a response to the company's refusal to negotiate better working conditions.
The movement took place in cities such as New York, Atlanta and San Francisco and was classified as the largest strike against Amazon in the history of the United States.
According to Teamsters President Sean M. O'Brien, "the company ignores workers' demands and prioritizes its corporate greed."
In response, Amazon has denied the allegations and said the union does not represent the majority of its employees.
Impact on Brazil
Despite the challenges faced in the United States, Amazon's operations in Brazil continue without major changes.
The strike and problems related to offices in the US should not impact deliveries or the operation of Brazilian units.
Still, the scenario can serve as a warning for future discussions about working conditions and the viability of hybrid or in-person models in the country.
Amazon's attempt to end remote working highlights the challenges faced by large corporations when trying to implement structural changes.
As the company seeks to reinforce its organizational culture through in-person work, it faces resistance from its employees, in addition to significant logistical limitations.
Do you think remote work should be kept as a permanent option or are companies right to require people to return to the office? Leave your opinion in the comments!
If remote work is working, if there is no loss of any kind for the company, then why change a team that is winning?
But what Amazon is saying is that it's not working for them.
When did Amazon say this? They just said that they want to put everyone in the office because of a certain organizational culture, but they didn't give any objective and real justification for the need to end home office. Remember that Amazon is an online sales company, so it's a huge contradiction for them to require in-person work.
The owner of Tesla (EM) who hates humanity, declared that home office was nonsense. And that's why CEOs are acting this way, against themselves, against productivity and increasing operational costs just to follow this path. This is the New World Order that is beginning and this suffering is just the beginning.
The bosses miss the “power” they had, controlling even the breathing of employees, controlling trips to the bathroom, etc. That’s why there is no plausible explanation for the return to in-person work.
No, the CEO said something about reinforcing culture and promoting collaboration among employees, a poorly explained justification.
How can a company of this size have some directors or presidents with such small heads, their ears are bigger than their heads, these directors seem to study but do not evolve, remote work is good for everyone and of course this has already been proven in several large companies.