Elon Musk’s Decision Resonates After Criticism of Trump’s Fiscal Plan and Threat to Cancel Contracts with the U.S. Government
The aerospace company SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, announced on Thursday, June 5, 2025, the start of the deactivation of the Dragon spacecraft. The capsule is currently used in NASA’s crewed missions. The statement was made by Musk on his official account on platform X.
The reaction was a direct response to Donald Trump’s threat to cancel all government contracts with companies controlled by the billionaire. This decision marks another chapter in the clash between Tesla’s executive and the former U.S. president.
Tensions began when Musk publicly criticized the fiscal plan proposed by Trump. The plan has been supported by the Republican during his presidential campaign.
-
Brazilian mechanic invented a lamp made from a PET bottle during the 2001 blackout, the idea turned into an NGO present in 30 countries and has already illuminated 40,000 people in 200 communities without electricity in Brazil.
-
The first trillionaire in history, Elon Musk, opens his wallet and pays the equivalent of R$ 306 billion, or US$ 60 billion, for the artificial intelligence programming startup Cursor, in yet another AI investment made through SpaceX, his rocket company.
-
The future of computers may change sooner than expected: Amazon bets on commercial quantum computing within seven years, while qubits, the Ocelot chip, AI, and scientific simulations take center stage in the new race among big techs.
-
What does a Covid-19 vaccine have to do with heart attack and stroke? A study with over 1 million veterans reveals an unexpected link between immunization, the heart, and seniors over 75 years old.
Dragon Represents a Strategic Pillar for the Transportation of U.S. Astronauts
Since 2008, SpaceX has accumulated over US$ 20 billion in contracts with federal institutions in the United States. Among them are NASA, the Air Force, and other government agencies.
Therefore, the Dragon capsule has become essential to ensure the autonomy of the United States in transporting astronauts to the International Space Station. Since the end of the Space Shuttle program in 2011, the U.S. has relied on Dragon for these missions.
A recent example was the return of astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams in March 2025. They were stranded at the ISS following failures in a Boeing capsule. Dragon ensured the safe return of the duo.
Thus, the capsule’s importance lies not only in technological innovation. It is a strategic pillar of U.S. space policy.
Musk’s Decision Amplifies Debate on Policy and Government Contracts
Musk’s statements were motivated by threats made by Trump on June 3, 2025. The former president claimed that if re-elected, he would cancel all contracts with the entrepreneur’s companies.
Right after Trump’s remarks, Musk responded via platform X. He stated that SpaceX would begin the deactivation of the Dragon capsule immediately. The response heightened the tone of the dispute.
Analysts and experts reacted with concern. Specialized media, such as Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal, reported on the episode. Industry experts questioned the potential consequences for the schedule of upcoming missions.
This measure could, in fact, impact operations already scheduled for the coming months. After all, existing contracts require deliveries and technical support.
Experts Point to Risk for U.S. Space Autonomy
Charles Bolden, former NASA administrator, stated that the withdrawal of the capsule could jeopardize the technological independence of the United States. Currently, Boeing is still trying to stabilize its own capsule.
However, tests conducted in the first half of 2025 indicated failures in Boeing’s coupling and navigation system. This reinforces the need for a safe and reliable alternative like Dragon.
Although Musk declared that the deactivation would be “immediate,” experts assert that the technical execution could take several months. This is because there are contractual commitments and complex logistical requirements.
Even so, the signal sent by Musk is already generating uncertainties. Governments and international partners are monitoring the situation with apprehension.
Political and Institutional Reactions Signal Long-Term Impasse
In the U.S. Congress, although there are partisan differences, lawmakers from different parties reacted swiftly.
Meanwhile, Democrats claimed that for this reason, Trump’s attitude represents a clear political retaliation.
Furthermore, according to them, this action could thus jeopardize important scientific advances, which would ultimately harm national development.
Republicans, on the other hand, argue that companies funded with public resources should align with national interests. This view is shared by part of the conservative electorate.
Legal sources state that the contracts of SpaceX with federal agencies include clauses that prevent unilateral cancellation. This factor could hinder the immediate execution of Trump’s threat.
NASA has not yet made an official statement. However, agency technicians indicate that alternatives are being evaluated. The main concern is to ensure the continuity of crewed space missions.


Be the first to react!