The first animal to live on Earth was so soft that it left no trace for 160 million years — until a 550-million-year-old fossil, published in Nature, revealed it existed much earlier than science imagined
For over a century, paleontologists knew something didn’t add up. DNA analyses indicated that sea sponges — Earth’s first animal — emerged around 710 million years ago. But the oldest known fossils were only 540 million years old. This meant a 160-million-year gap with no trace of the planet’s first animal.
Now, a study published in the journal Nature on April 15, 2026 has solved this mystery. A 550-million-year-old fossil, preserved in exceptional conditions, revealed a primitive sea sponge — and explained why no one had found it before.
The animal was too soft to fossilize.
-
Brazilian scientists use high-frequency ultrasound to burst Covid-19 and H1N1 viruses without damaging human cells and point to a path for new treatments against dengue and zika.
-
Scientists find a super-reservoir of 6,000 km³ of magma beneath Tuscany at depths of up to 15 km, paving the way to explore geothermal energy, lithium, and rare earth elements.
-
Red dots from the James Webb may reveal black holes that are relics from before the Big Bang, says a study proposing a “Great Bounce” and suggesting a connection with dark matter.
-
10-year-old girl falls in love with Minecraft, compares game stones with real minerals, and becomes the youngest Brazilian to publish a scientific article.
Earth’s first animal had no skeleton — which is why no one found it
The discovery was led by geobiologist Shuhai Xiao, from Virginia Tech, in the United States, in collaboration with researchers from the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology in China, and the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom.
The fossil belongs to a primitive sea sponge, a distant relative of the so-called glass sponges that exist in the oceans today.
But, unlike modern sponges, this 550-million-year-old creature had no spicules — the needle-like mineral structures that give current sponges rigidity.
No skeleton, no hard parts, nothing that could resist decomposition and be preserved in rock.
“The discovery indicates that perhaps the first sponges were spongy, but not vitreous,” Xiao said.
In other words: Earth’s first animal was soft like a kitchen sponge. And that’s why it left no trace for 160 million years.

A surface pattern no one had seen before
What made this fossil so special was its exceptional preservation.
Unlike common fossils, which only record hard parts like bones and shells, this one preserved the surface texture of the animal’s soft body.
Xiaopeng Wang, a postdoctoral researcher between the Nanjing Institute and the University of Cambridge, analyzed the pattern in detail.
“This specific pattern suggests that our fossilized sea sponge is more closely related to a certain species of glass sponge,” Wang said.
The pattern had never been observed in any other fossil. It was precisely this that allowed researchers to classify the animal as a sponge, even without the typical spicules.
To understand its importance: it’s like identifying a fingerprint at a crime scene where the suspect never officially existed.
How 160 million years of evolutionary silence were finally explained
The problem that plagued paleontologists was simple to understand, but almost impossible to solve.
Genetics said one thing. The fossil record said another.
- Molecular evidence indicates sponges emerged 710 million years ago
- The oldest fossils with clear spicules date back 540 million years
- The new fossil fills the gap, dating back 550 million years
This means that for 160 million years, Earth’s first animal lived, reproduced, and died without leaving any trace in the rock.
Now, scientists know it’s not because the animal didn’t exist. It’s because it was too soft to be preserved.
“Now we know we need to broaden our view when looking for primitive sponges,” Xiao said.

The difference between the primitive sponge and those that exist today
The glass sponges that live in the oceans today are fascinating animals in themselves.
They build skeletons made of silica — the same material as glass — with needle-like structures called spicules.
Some modern sponges live more than 5,000 meters deep and can be over 10,000 years old.
The 550-million-year-old sponge, however, had none of this. Its body was entirely soft.
This suggests that the mineral skeletons of sponges evolved gradually — and that the ancestor of all animals was a creature without any rigid protection.
It’s an idea that changes how scientists look for ancient fossils. Instead of searching for hard structures, they now know they should look for subtle impressions of soft tissues.
What the international team found — and why it took so long
The study brought together researchers from three continents: Virginia Tech in the United States, the Nanjing Institute in China, and the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom.
As early as 2019, Xiao and his team had proposed that the first sponges had no spicules. But physical proof was missing.
The 550-million-year-old fossil provided that proof.
Published in Nature — one of the world’s most rigorous scientific journals — the April 15, 2026 study closes a decades-long debate in paleontology.
The preservation of soft tissues in rock is extremely rare. Specific conditions of temperature, pressure, and absence of oxygen must coincide for an organism without a skeleton to leave any mark.
Therefore, finding this fossil was, in the words of the researchers, like “finding a needle in a haystack — except the needle is made of cotton.”

What changes in the history of life on Earth
If sponges truly emerged 710 million years ago, then animal life on Earth is at least 170 million years older than fossils showed.
This has enormous implications.
It means that animals already existed during periods of extreme glaciations — the so-called “Snowball Earth” eras — when the entire planet was covered in ice.
Animal life did not emerge after climatic catastrophes. It survived them.
However, the researchers themselves warn that this is just one fossil. The hypothesis of soft bodies without a skeleton is an explanatory proposal, not absolute proof. More discoveries are needed to confirm that the absence of spicules was the norm among the first sponges — and not just an exception.
The 160-million-year gap may be starting to close. But the primordial ocean floor still holds many secrets.

Seja o primeiro a reagir!