After Years of Paying Alimony, a Father from Alagoas Decided to Go to Court to Terminate His Adult Children’s Benefit. The Favorable Decision Generated Great Repercussion and Sparked Debate on How Far Parents’ Obligation Goes.
A father obtained the right to stop paying alimony to his two adult children in court, after claiming that both were already capable of supporting themselves. The case was judged by the Court of Justice of Alagoas (TJAL), which upheld the first-instance decision determining the end of the obligation.
The two children presented a defense. One of them stated that he still needed the support because he was pursuing a professional qualification as an electronics technician.
The other claimed to have a mild disability and relied on alimony to supplement his income from his job.
-
Braking only in front of the radar and accelerating right after may no longer be an option for drivers, because BR-101 in Espírito Santo tested a system that measures the average speed over an entire stretch and caught a car at 124 km/h on a 60 km/h road.
-
The STJ decides that a woman who left her career for more than 30 years to take care of the house, children, and family is entitled to lifetime alimony after divorce; the decision by the 3rd Panel recognizes extreme financial vulnerability and values invisible work in marriage.
-
Two global aviation giants are convicted in Paris and will have to pay R$ 1.3 million each for the crash of the Rio-Paris flight that killed 228 people in 2009.
-
Deputies against the government join forces to maintain a 6×1 schedule, workweeks of up to 52 hours, a 10-year transition, halving the FGTS, and special rules for certain sectors.
Arguments Rejected by the Court
The first-instance judge understood that the mentioned technical course had already been completed, dismissing the justification from the first son.
He also found that the second son, although having a mild disability, was employed in a position reserved for people with disabilities. In light of this, the court determined that the financial autonomy of both was proven and ordered the cancellation of the alimony.
Both appealed the decision, but the court upheld the ruling. During the judgment, it was recorded that, at the time, the children were 29 and 26 years old and did not demonstrate any real need or inability to work.
Understanding of the Court of Justice of Alagoas
The reporting judge emphasized in his vote that alimony payments to adult children should occur only in exceptional situations.
He noted that, in these cases, the goal is to prevent the benefit from becoming an incentive to idleness. For the magistrate, financial dependence cannot replace the personal effort of those who already have full work capacity.
Reflection on Prolonged Dependence
The case reignites a recurring discussion in Family Law: to what extent should parents continue to support adult children.
According to reports from lawyers, it is common for individuals with work capabilities to insist on maintaining alimony even when they have qualifications or jobs.

Be the first to react!