English 
5 min of reading 
0 comments 
The idea is simple and bold: use satellites as cell towers in space, so that any common device has a signal anywhere, without an extra antenna. The three largest operators in the United States said no to a partnership and, in May, announced an unprecedented alliance to join forces against the approaching dominance.
Starlink, Elon Musk’s satellite internet company, wants to transform its satellite constellation into a true cell phone operator, capable of covering any point on the planet. But the three American giants in the sector, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon, rejected the partnership proposal and united for the first time in history to try to contain the company’s advance in the mobile phone market.
The movement gained strength in May 2026, with the news that the three rivals would form an unprecedented alliance. Starlink’s idea is to act as a virtual operator, a model in which a company offers telephone service without having its own network, combining its satellites with terrestrial agreements to create a hybrid and potentially global coverage. The proposal promises to end dead zones, but directly threatens the business model of traditional operators.
What Starlink is trying to do
Musk’s company’s plan didn’t come out of nowhere. The service began in 2024 as Direct to Cell and was commercially launched in July 2025, in partnership with T-Mobile, allowing ordinary cell phones to connect directly to satellites, without the need for an antenna or extra equipment. At the end of 2025, SpaceX registered the Starlink Mobile brand, signaling ambitions for its own service.
-
Five times faster than sound, powered by ‘water’ and capable of reaching 6,174 km/h, ESA’s INVICTUS aims to fly at Mach 5 at the edge of space by 2031 using a hypersonic engine with pre-cooled air.
-
China wants to place humanoid robots in homes to fry eggs, do laundry, and make beds, but a test with 100 households shows that the elderly, children, pets, and fragile objects may be the biggest obstacle in the new AI race.
-
Wi-Fi 7 arrives in Brazil promising to eliminate lags by connecting 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz simultaneously, attract over US$ 10 billion, and transform homes with dozens of smart devices connected at the same time.
-
The James Webb Telescope photographed a gigantic galaxy less than 2 billion years after the Big Bang that simply does not rotate, a behavior astronomers only expected to see in much older galaxies.
To boost these plans, SpaceX closed a billion-dollar deal with EchoStar, valued at around $17 billion, to acquire spectrum bands, the “space” through which cell signals travel. At the Mobile World Congress, the world’s leading telecommunications fair, held in March 2026, company executives presented the goal of offering terrestrial-like connectivity anywhere, using next-generation satellites that function as orbital cell towers.
Why the operators said no
Despite the potential, the three largest operators in the United States have refused to open their networks to Starlink in the virtual operator model. In the first quarter 2026 earnings conference calls, AT&T and T-Mobile dismissed the idea, and Verizon’s CEO, Dan Schulman, was straightforward by simply responding “no” when asked about the partnership.
The concern is clear: by giving access to their infrastructure, the operators would, in practice, be feeding a future competitor with the potential to steal their customers and pressure wholesale network prices. For companies that have invested billions in towers and spectrum over decades, making room for Starlink sounds like handing over the keys to their own business to a powerful and deep-pocketed rival.
The unprecedented alliance of the three rivals
The response came in the form of a historic union. On May 14, 2026, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon announced an agreement in principle to form a joint venture that will combine their spectrums and expand direct satellite connectivity in the country, a technology known as D2D, short for direct to device. It is the first time that the three largest rivals in the sector have united in this way.
The move was widely interpreted by the market as a defensive response to Starlink’s advance. It is worth noting, however, that the alliance is still just a preliminary agreement, with no defined financial structure or implementation schedule, and some analysts assess that it functions more as a technical platform to standardize the connection between satellites and cell phones than as a total blockade against Musk’s company. In any case, the message of unity against a common enemy was evident.
The paradox: rivals who are also partners
An interesting aspect of this dispute is that it mixes competition and cooperation at the same time. T-Mobile itself, one of those that rejected the virtual operator model, already uses SpaceX satellites in its T-Satellite service, the most popular of its kind in the United States currently. In other words, the companies fight on one front and ally on another.
This paradox shows how the telecommunications sector is experiencing a moment of redefinition. Traditional operators need satellite technology to eliminate signal dead zones and not fall behind, but at the same time, they fear that companies like Starlink will become too large and start dictating the rules of the game. It is a tense relationship, where today’s allies can be tomorrow’s competitors, and vice versa.
The likely outcome: negotiation
Despite the public denials, many analysts believe that this story will still end in an agreement. According to the Besen Group, cited by the specialized press, Starlink will likely close a virtual operator contract with one of the three giants, using the spectrum it bought from EchoStar as a bargaining chip in negotiations, offering frequency bands in exchange for better network access conditions.
Among the market predictions, AT&T appears as a strong candidate due to its spectrum position, but some bet on T-Mobile, which is already a partner, or even on Verizon. The most optimistic projections estimate that Starlink could reach about 20 million users in the United States within five years. In other words, the current resistance may be just the beginning of a negotiation that will reshape the telecommunications market.
Why this topic matters to the Brazilian reader
The topic has direct relevance to Brazil. Starlink is already a strong presence in the country, providing satellite internet to remote regions of the Amazon, to agribusiness, and to areas where traditional connectivity does not reach, and the arrival of a satellite phone service could further expand this reach, impacting national operators.
Furthermore, the dispute raises important debates about digital sovereignty, telecommunications regulation, and dependence on foreign infrastructure, sensitive topics for any country. For readers who follow technology, energy, and infrastructure, understanding how this battle unfolds in the United States helps anticipate movements that may reach the Brazilian market in the coming years, especially in connectivity for sectors like oil, mining, and agriculture in isolated areas.
Starlink’s offensive to become a mobile operator and the unprecedented reaction from AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon show that the telecommunications market is facing a historic turning point. On one side, the promise of total coverage, without dead zones, anywhere on the planet. On the other, giants trying to protect a business model built over decades. It is most likely that, despite the current resistance, the strength of Elon Musk’s company will eventually lead to some kind of agreement, forever reshaping the way we connect.
And you, would you like to have a phone that works anywhere in the world via Starlink satellite? Do you think traditional operators will be able to contain Elon Musk’s advance in the sector? Leave your comment, share your opinion about the future of telephony, and share the article with those interested in technology, satellites, and the future of connectivity.
Be the first to react!