Supreme Court Decision Validates Rule of the Civil Procedure Code That Allows Release of Inherited Assets Before Payment of State Inheritance Taxes (ITCMD) to Facilitate Inheritances
The Supreme Federal Court (STF) confirmed the validity of an important procedural rule that benefits heirs nationwide. The court unanimously ruled that the approval of the amicable sharing of assets can occur even without prior payment of the Inheritance and Donation Tax (ITCMD).
This determination was made during the judgment of Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) 5894. The virtual session was concluded on April 24 and resulted in the dismissal of the request aimed at blocking this speed in inheritance and sharing processes.
What Motivated the Decision About Amicable Inheritance Sharing
The original action was proposed by the government of the Federal District. The argument used was that the release of the sharing without prior payment of the tax violated the tax equalization stipulated in the Federal Constitution.
-
Chinese giant chooses SC to set up its first factory in Brazil, investing R$ 250 million and producing MRI machines costing R$ 10 million each, with 100 direct jobs and 5% of revenue allocated to research.
-
After selling a unit for R$ 115 million to pay off debts, a traditional factory in SC founded in 1932 has a new R$ 64.8 million plan denied by the court and retains about 690 workers in Joinville.
-
Use of slimming pens skyrockets in Brazil, surpasses the global average, and causes unexpected changes in consumption habits, diet, beauty, and the wellness market.
-
Itaú shuts down service, lays off 350 employees, and creates internal tension after closing an operation created just 10 months ago; employees report pressure for targets, system failures, and extra costs to serve customers.
In addition, it questioned whether there was compliance with the requirement of complementary law regarding guarantees and privileges of tax credit. The local government’s aim was to prevent the rule of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) from being applied in this way.
The court analyzed the validity of Article 659, Paragraph 2 of the CPC. This legal provision provides a simpler and faster procedural rite specifically for cases where there is an agreement between the parties regarding the division of assets and rights left by the deceased.
Understand the Grounds Presented by the Rapporteur
Minister André Mendonça acted as the rapporteur of the action and defended the maintenance of the rule. The established understanding is that this differentiated procedure seeks to ensure reasonable duration of the judicial process.
The priority is to foster conflict resolution through consensual agreements. This guideline aligns with the fundamental principles established by the Federal Constitution itself to streamline access to justice.
For the rapporteur, the rule does not interfere with general tax regulations nor violates the legal reserve. The provision exclusively addresses a procedural matter to enable the swift transfer of inherited assets.
Details on Equity and Tax Rules for Inheritance
The decision clarifies that the measure does not grant undue privileges nor affects the guarantees of tax credit. The change focuses on the progression of the civil process and not on the tax collection structure itself.
The argument of violation of the tax equality principle was also rejected by the court. The understanding is that the excerpt of the CPC does not alter the tax incidence hypothesis nor exempts future payment.
It is merely a summary procedure that reflects the legitimate exercise of the right to action. Heirs can finalize the formal division of assets without being hindered by the requirement of immediate tax payment at that specific moment in the process.
Impact of the Measure for Families and Heirs
With this unanimous decision, it is ensured that fiscal bureaucracy should not impede the approval of amicable sharing agreements. The main focus becomes the prompt regularization of asset ownership for successors.
The payment of ITCMD remains an obligation, but its prior payment is no longer an obstacle for the judicial validation of the sharing. This unblocks inheritances and facilitates the lives of those seeking to resolve succession matters consensually.

Estou com um inventário a 11 anos, fórum da barra, nunca teve nenhum julgamento, ninguém trabalha nesse fórum da barra, é o pior do Brasil ou do mundo.