English 
Spanish 
3 min read
2 comments
China's possible invasion of Taiwan puts TSMC at the center of global tensions. Find out how the US plans to protect the world's semiconductor leader and prevent its Chinese takeover
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) is the world's largest chipmaker, accounting for approximately 60% of the global semiconductor market. Its strategic position puts it at the center of geopolitical tensions between the United States and China, especially in the context of a possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
The importance of TSMC on the global stage
TSMC plays a crucial role in the global technology industry, supplying advanced semiconductors to companies such as Apple, NVIDIA, AMD and Qualcomm. An estimated 92% of the cutting-edge chips used in the United States are manufactured by TSMC in Taiwan.
This dependence highlights TSMC’s strategic importance not only to the U.S., but to the global economy. A disruption to its operations could have a significant impact on technology supply chains around the world.
- US moves to buy Greenland: Trump assumes FULL POWER to negotiate and redraw the world map!
- Explorers find abandoned NATO military bases in Italy
- New pandemic on the way? China goes on high alert after confirming its FIRST OUTBREAK of the new variant of mpox, previously known as monkeypox
- Brazil lost 33 km of strategic territory to the United Kingdom in a classic example of the lasting impact of British imperialism in South America
The China Threat and US Strategy
In the face of the possibility of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, discussions have arisen about preventive measures to prevent China from taking control of TSMC facilities. Elbridge Colby, Donald Trump's nominee for Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, advocates the destruction of TSMC's factories in the event of an invasion. In May 2023, Colby stated: "We would be fools to allow TSMC to fall into China's hands intact."
This position reflects US concerns about preventing China from gaining access to advanced semiconductor technologies, which could strengthen its position on the global technological and military stage.
Challenges of preventive destruction
The proposed destruction of TSMC’s facilities raises a number of complex issues. First, there is the technical challenge of quickly disabling or destroying highly sophisticated factories without causing significant collateral damage. In addition, such an action could have profound political and economic repercussions, including the deterioration of relations between the US and Taiwan, as well as negative impacts on the global economy due to the disruption of semiconductor production.
Experts argue that threatening to destroy TSMC is unnecessary and counterproductive. They suggest that the semiconductor industry is complex and that transferring control of the factories would not automatically result in a technological advantage for China.
Alternatives and additional measures
Instead of considering the destruction of the facilities of the TSMC, some voices suggest that the United States and its allies should focus on strengthening their own semiconductor manufacturing capabilities. Initiatives such as the CHIPS for America Act, which provides $52 billion to encourage chip manufacturing in the United States, are steps in this direction. In addition, TSMC has announced plans to build a $12 billion factory in Arizona, aiming to diversify its production and reduce geopolitical risks.
Another consideration is the ability to remotely disable production machines in the event of an intrusion, preventing China from using the facilities without the need for physical destruction. ASML, an equipment supplier to TSMC, has indicated that such a remote shutdown would be possible, offering a less drastic alternative.
TSMC represents a critical juncture at the intersection of technology and geopolitics. The possibility of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan and the proposed preemptive destruction of its facilities highlight the complexity of contemporary international relations. As the United States seeks to protect its interests and maintain its technological leadership, it is essential to consider solutions that balance national security with global economic stability, while avoiding rash actions that could have long-term adverse consequences.
I place it in the hands of the Lord, so that only His will may be done. God does not want His children to suffer. He is not in favor of war, but if it is necessary, let it happen. And may suffering drive human beings to seek God's power to save this planet, as God revealed in His Word, the Bible. Amen!!!
It will destroy **** none!
With these absurd statements, I think he wants to become Kennedy! He's going to dance before the inauguration!