Even Though It Is a Public Service, Street Lighting Is Paid For by the Residents Themselves
When it comes to public lighting, many believe that the service is maintained by the city hall. After all, if the light is on the streets, squares, and sidewalks, it seems logical to think that it is funded with public money. But the reality is different: the citizen is the one who pays this bill — in two different ways.
The main form of charge is the CIP, which stands for Contribution for Public Lighting. This amount appears on the electricity bill every month, usually in a separate line.
Created based on Article 149-A of the Federal Constitution, the CIP can be established by each municipality, with its own rules.
-
12-year-old boy becomes a hero by saving a wheelchair-bound neighbor in a fire and inspires a story of overcoming and courage.
-
WHO declares international emergency after new Ebola outbreak advances and fear of global spread grows
-
Amazon launches electric bike deliveries to reduce emissions and replace vans in Washington
-
Brazilian investigated by the FBI is suspected of embezzling million-dollar jewelry and causing losses of up to R$ 100 million in the US and Brazil
In general, the charged amount varies according to energy consumption. The higher the residential use, the greater the contribution.
Even those who live on streets without lighting or with few poles also pay. The charge does not depend on the location of the property or the number of lamps on the street — it is calculated only based on your electricity bill.
CIP Is Mandatory and Comes with the Electricity Bill
The charging of the CIP is not optional. If the city where you live has established this contribution by law, it will be automatically included in the bill.
It does not matter if you use the street light or not. The mere fact of consuming electric energy activates the charge.
For this reason, many people are surprised to see different CIP amounts on their electricity bill. Those who consume little may pay less than R$ 5. Those who consume more may see over R$ 80 just for the lighting contribution.
It is a proportional system that seeks to keep the service running, but it also raises doubts. After all, the charge is not fixed, nor does it directly depend on the use of the service.

-
1 person reacted to this.