Portuguese 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
Retirees and Pensioners Often Believe That the INSS Benefit Is Fully Protected Against Creditors, But the Law Provides Important Exceptions. In Specific Situations, Part of the Income May Be Blocked to Ensure Legal Obligations, Such as Alimony, Consigned Contracts, and Even Proven Frauds.
Having debts can generate numerous problems throughout life, and among the most concerning is the possibility of compromising the INSS retirement.
Although Brazilian legislation provides for mechanisms of protection, there are exceptions that may put the benefit at risk.
According to Article 833, section IV, of Law No. 13,105/2015 dthe Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), retirements, pensions, and salaries are considered unseizable.
-
Florida takes TikTok to court and accuses the Chinese giant ByteDance of ignoring the law that bars minors under 14, while parents and authorities demand more protection for children on social networks.
-
Chamber approves constitutional amendment reducing the age of criminal responsibility from 18 to 16 years; what now?
-
Justice confirms that old debts in tax executions that have been stalled for more than 15 years can no longer be collected through judicial or administrative means.
-
Churches may gain a new exemption in the tax reform, but the Treasury warns that Brazilians may pay more taxes to compensate for the loss of revenue.
This means that, as a rule, they cannot be blocked to pay debts.
The seizure, in this context, is a legal process in which values or assets of a person are retained to ensure the fulfillment of a financial obligation.
The text of the law is clear: “The following are unseizable: wages, salaries, pensions, retirement benefits, pecuniary benefits from third parties destined for the support of the debtor and their family, earnings of self-employed workers, and fees from independent professionals.”
However, this rule is not absolute. The CPC itself provides for specific situations in which retirement may be partially compromised. There are three main cases.
Alimony Takes Priority
The Justice system understands that alimony is essential for the sustenance of another person.
Therefore, it can authorize the seizure of up to 50% of the retirement amount to settle debts of this nature.
Paragraph 2 of the same article emphasizes that the protection does not apply in cases of alimony payments, regardless of their origin.
The provisions in sections IV and X of the caput do not apply to the seizure for the payment of alimony, regardless of its origin, as well as amounts exceeding 50 minimum monthly wages
Consigned Loans Allow Direct Discounts
Another point is the consigned credit. In this type of contract, the retiree or pensioner allows the installments to be deducted directly from their benefit.
Thus, unlike other debts, the bank can collect monthly, since there was express authorization from the insured at the time of contracting.
Fraud or Irregular Use Can Nullify Protection
The third exception occurs in cases of fraud or irregularities, such as undue accumulation of retirements or document forgery.
In these cases, the Justice can determine partial or even total blocking of the benefit, depending on the outcome of the investigation.
Although less common, these episodes represent a real risk for those who attempt to circumvent the system.
With these exceptions, it becomes evident that, although there is legal protection, the INSS retirement is not completely shielded. Therefore, it is essential for retirees and pensioners to understand their rights, manage their finances carefully, and avoid compromising the income designated for their own and their family’s support.
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 people reacted to this.