Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
8 comments 
The Proposal Provides Gradual Cuts to the Weekly Workload and Raises Concerns About Monthly Salary, Productivity, and Corporate Reorganization
The PEC 148/2015 brings a broad change to work routines to the center of the debate, focusing on reducing the weekly workload and ending the 6×1 schedule.
The measure is seen as a way to enhance quality of life and free time, while also pressuring companies to reconsider processes to maintain productivity.
The topic is gaining traction due to its impact on mental health, as the pursuit of high performance and efficiency has increased stress levels in the workplace.
-
Government enacts new law: paternity leave increases from 5 to 20 days with gradual increases until 2029, and Social Security pays the paternity salary; companies no longer bear the absence cost, estimated at R$ 5.4 billion.
-
End of the 1-hour lunch break in the CLT? Current labor law maintains the break, allows for negotiated reductions, and defines rules for working hours and home office in Brazil.
-
Employee Fired After Accumulating 114 Days of Medical Leave in One Year, Labor Court Upholds Company’s Decision
-
Employee Fired While Treating Depression Wins in Court and Vale Is Required to Rehire Him Following Decision Based on the CLT and INSS Benefits
What Happened and Why It Caught Attention
Technological advances and constant connectivity have changed the way we work and use time outside of working hours. Discussion about disconnection and limits to preserve rest has grown.
At the same time, demand for results has increased, reinforcing a scenario of pressure for maximum productivity and efficiency. This has heightened attention to well-being at work.
In this context, reducing the weekly workload has begun to be viewed as an alternative to balance personal and professional life, without losing sight of the effects on cost and work organization.
What Changes in Practice for Workers and Companies
The PEC 148/2015 proposes an end to the 6×1 schedule and the gradual reduction of the workload from 44 to 36 hours per week, with cuts until this level is reached.
For workers, the expectation is for more free time and greater balance. For employers, the challenge arises to maintain production with fewer available working hours.
Business perspectives also indicate the risk of needing more hires for the same role, which could increase production costs and require operational replanning.
What Are the Rules and Principles Surrounding Work Hours and Salary
Brazilian labor legislation operates with principles of salary protection and limits on daily and weekly work duration. There is also the idea of salary irreducibility and the prohibition of contractual changes that harm the worker.
The protection of a minimum wage sufficient to meet basic needs is a reference for social protection, alongside the limits on working hours.
Another relevant point is the method of calculating salary based on the value of hours worked, which influences how workload reduction may affect the total received in a month.
The Most Sensitive Point: Reducing Hours Can Reduce Total Monthly Earnings
There is an idea circulating that reducing the workload will not lead to salary reductions, but there is one point that requires attention: maintaining the hourly rate does not guarantee the maintenance of total monthly salary.
If someone worked 44 hours weekly and shifts to working 36, the total monthly may drop, even at the same rate per hour, because there are fewer hours in the period.
The scenario of reducing from 44 to 40 weekly hours illustrates this type of controversy when the change only preserves the hourly rate and not the total for the month.
What May Happen to Income and Free Time
With a smaller monthly total, those with fixed living expenses may seek additional income, like informal work or side jobs, to complete their budget.
This movement can negate some of the expected gains in quality of life, as free time may be consumed by a second paid activity.
The discussion also opens space to consider legal adjustments that address compensation, aligning work hour reduction with effective maintenance of monthly income, without creating distortions for workers and employers.
How Companies Can Prepare for Production Reorganization
A significant change in work hours requires a review of processes and optimization of workflows to fit into the new daily and weekly limits. Adaptation involves redesigning routines and better utilizing productive time.
People management is likely to play a central role in assessing the need for hires and the impact of payroll on operational costs. Managerial and team training is also required to reinforce a culture of focus and results.
Management tools, including productivity incentive plans, can be used as support, maintaining as a premise the protection of health and well-being for everyone involved.
The PEC 148/2015 proposes a significant shift by altering the 6×1 schedule and reducing the weekly work hours from 44 to 36 hours, with gradual cuts until reaching the new limit.
The practical impact focuses on two points: the need for companies to adapt to preserve productivity and the risk of a decline in total monthly salary if the change only preserves the hourly rate without guaranteeing the total received in the month.
Essa escala 6×1 já deveria ter acabado a muito tempo, nós trabalhadores passamos mais tempo na empresa do que com nossas famílias, misericórdia chega dessa escala 6×1.
Creio que é uma ideia a ser estudada, porem isso deveria ser acordado entre empregado e patrão… pois se esta difícil para pagar os imposto e as contas tanto para ambos , imagina agora?? Pois trabalho dois horários pois as contas e impostos nao param.
Aluguel, água, luz,alimentação,internet,iptu da casa alugada, se tiver uma motinha tem ipva(manutenção, combustível).
Pela situação que o Brasil vive , com tantos impostos criados em um curto tempo precisamos ver se vai valer a pena.
Ta falando ****, se tu quiser ficar preso na escala 6×1 sendo visita da tua propria casa o problema é teu e do seu patrão, não para o resto; patrão nenhum vai concordar com essa ideia, mas na posição que eles se encontram o salário deles não tem comparação com alguém que ganha um salário mínimo e passa o mesmo tempo fora e ainda tem que arrumar bico pra complementar o mês com a corda no pescoço
Patrão ta só arrumando desculpa pra ter o direito de forçar o trabalhador a escolher os interesses deles.
vai ser uma grande vitória para nós trabalhadores essa escala de 6×1 não existe acaba com o direito de descansar com nossa família 😞 ninguém merece.