Decision Will Be Made Regarding the Merits of the Action Related to the Mariana Tragedy, with Significant Implications for the Parties Involved.
In the lawsuit, damages related to property and income, increased expenses, psychological effects, consequences of displacement, lack of water and electricity, and other damages are highlighted. In the case of indigenous peoples and quilombola communities, the impacts on cultural traditions and the consequences of interaction with the environment are also cited. These impacts cover a range of areas and are crucial for understanding the effects of the action on the affected communities.
The judge considered that there was not enough evidence that the Brazilian justice system was unable to guarantee fair compensation. However, in July 2022, the appeals court accepted the appeal of those affected and determined that the merits of the case should be examined. From that moment on, the Anglo-Australian mining company began advocating for the inclusion of Vale in the process.
According to a report released earlier this month by the Pogust Goodhead office, the value of the action is estimated at £66 billion, which is approximately R$ 230 billion. The lawyers also request that the interest rate be set at 12% per year from the date of the tragedy. In the event of a favorable decision, the division of resources should consider the percentage participation in the total estimated damages: 66% for individuals, 23% for municipalities, and 10% for companies. The remaining 1% refers to religious institutions that claim property losses and damage to ties with the devastated communities.
-
While Brazil sits on the pre-salt and still imports diesel, Turkey, which produces almost no oil, crossed half the world to drill 7,500 meters below the sea in Somalia in search of its own fuel.
-
Why didn’t oil reach $150 even after three months of the Strait of Hormuz being closed?
-
Farmer drills well in Ceará in search of water, accidentally finds crude oil and sees million-dollar discovery hindered by a rule that completely changes the future of the site.
-
Family finds oil on a 49-hectare site in Ceará, but exploration has no timeline or guarantee of happening
Court Decision on the BHP Billiton Case
Initially, BHP Billiton claimed that there was a repetition of legal processes and argued that compensation for damages should be granted exclusively under the supervision of Brazilian courts. The process was temporarily suspended at the beginning, during discussions on whether the case could be assessed in the country. Without delving into the merits of the issue, English judge Mark Turner accepted BHP Billiton’s arguments and ruled in 2020 that there was abuse, among other reasons, as conflicting decisions could arise from simultaneous judgments in Brazil and the United Kingdom.
Main Process
In addition to thousands of victims, municipalities, companies, and religious organizations are also claimants in the main process. In March of this year, 500,000 new sign-ups were made to the action. As a result, now more than 700,000 individuals and entities are being represented by the Pogust Goodhead law firm. The lawyers of those affected claim that Brazil has not been able to provide fair compensation. The hearings that will assess the responsibilities for the tragedy have been scheduled for October 2024.
The Vale issued a market statement informing about the British court’s decision. According to the text, the merits of the action have not yet been evaluated and judged. The statement highlights that Vale, as a shareholder of Samarco, believes that the solutions generated by agreements in Brazil, especially the TTAC, are capable of addressing the claims of the foreign process.
In a statement released, Tom Goodhead, CEO of the Pogust Goodhead law firm, stated that the mining companies cannot reach a consensus regarding the process. He emphasized that the two largest mining companies in the world are in litigation in the courts, instead of taking responsibility as owners of the dam that caused the worst environmental disaster in Brazil’s history. Goodhead further remarked that “No amount of money will be sufficient, but hiring the world’s most expensive lawyers to fight each other in court is a huge slap in the face for all those who continue to suffer daily because of this crime”.
More than eight years have passed, and the organization’s actions face numerous legal challenges from victims, the Public Ministry of Minas Gerais (MPMG), and the Federal Public Ministry (MPF). The discussions cover issues ranging from delays in completing reconstruction work in the destroyed areas to questions related to the amounts of compensations. An effort to renegotiate the reparation process, aimed at resolving more than 85,000 cases related to the tragedy, has been underway since last year.
BHP Billiton’s Response on the Work of the Renova Foundation
According to the statement, there is no need to repeat issues already addressed by the ongoing efforts of the Renova Foundation, which is under the supervision of Brazilian courts and is the subject of ongoing legal proceedings in Brazil. BHP Billiton claims that more than 200,000 affected individuals involved in the ongoing process in the United Kingdom have already received payments in Brazil.
The Renova Foundation was established in 2016 based on the Term of Transaction and Conduct Adjustment (TTAC) signed by the three mining companies, the Union, and the governments of Minas Gerais and Espírito Santo. The foundation is responsible for managing over 40 programs related to the environmental disaster.
A secondary action was filed by BHP Billiton against Vale, in which the Anglo-Australian miner argues that if found guilty, Vale should be responsible for at least half of the amount set by the court.
After the British court’s decision, BHP Billiton issued a statement reaffirming its position and declared that it is collaborating with Samarco and Vale to support the reparation process in Brazil. The company also challenged the allegations of those affected who filed the action and questioned the progress of the case in the United Kingdom.
Vale has until December 1 to submit its defense in a case ongoing in the UK judicial system related to the tragedy that occurred in the city of Mariana (MG) in November 2015. On Friday (24), a new decision was published, denying the miner’s request to appeal. Vale had been unsuccessfully questioning the competence of the British courts to examine the case. With the denial, the merits of the action will be judged.
This case is a follow-up to the action filed by thousands of affected people against the Anglo-Australian mining company BHP Billiton, headquartered in London. They are being represented by the Pogust Goodhead law firm and are seeking compensation for moral and material damages. Both BHP Billiton and Vale are shareholders of the Samarco mining company, which was responsible for the dam that collapsed, causing the tragedy. In the incident, 19 people lost their lives, and populations in several cities along the Doce River basin suffered severe impacts.
Source: InfoMoney

Be the first to react!