Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
4 min of reading 
0 comments 
In An Attempt To Strengthen The Dollar, The U.S. Considers Using Bitcoin As A Store Of Value. Understand The Proposal Of The “Digital Gold” And The Challenges Surrounding This Ambitious Strategy.
In recent years, Bitcoin has been gaining more and more attention, moving from the niche of technology enthusiasts to gaining ground in financial and even political discussions. Nicknamed “digital gold,” the cryptocurrency is seen by some as a possible tool to strengthen economies, including that of the U.S., a country where the debate about the future of the dollar and economic stability is always in the spotlight.
One of the bolder ideas that has emerged in this context is the proposal for the U.S. government to create a strategic reserve of Bitcoin as a way to boost the strength of the dollar. But does this idea make sense? The answer, as we will see, is not so simple — and it may be more problematic than it seems! Recently, an article published by the Cato Institute shed light on this issue, keep reading to understand everything about the use of the new “digital gold” as a store of value.
Bitcoin As The New “Digital Gold”? Not Really!
The comparison of Bitcoin to gold is not new. After all, both are seen as value assets, something to be used as a safeguard in times of economic uncertainty. But there is a big difference between the two: gold is a stable and widely accepted store of value, while Bitcoin is extremely volatile. Anyone who has invested in the cryptocurrency knows that the price can rise or plummet in a matter of hours.
-
Air bubbles from 3 million years ago extracted from Antarctic ice reveal that the current level of CO₂ has already surpassed that of the ancient, warm world, when the sea was up to 20 meters higher and there were no factories or cars burning fuel.
-
Brazil went to China to seek money and technology to reinvent TV and bring the internet to places where fiber does not reach. The mission negotiated with the BRICS Bank led by Dilma and paved the way for a Chinese rival of Starlink to connect the Amazon.
-
Iceland is going to lower a drill five kilometers to reach rock at 400 degrees and try to extract clean energy on a scale that a common well cannot achieve.
-
At the bottom of the South Pole ice, the IceCube observatory drilled more than a kilometer and a half of ice to hunt ghost particles and test whether gravity obeys the rules of quantum physics.
And this is a big problem when the idea is to use Bitcoin as a basis for strengthening the dollar. The author George Selgin from the Cato Institute argues that this strategy simply does not work. The reason? Bitcoin’s volatility makes it a very unstable asset to serve as the foundation for something as important as a national currency.
The Proposal Of The “Strategic Bitcoin Stock”
Among the supporters of this idea is none other than Donald Trump. The former president suggested that the U.S. take advantage of the Bitcoins already held by the government — most obtained through legal operations — to create a “National Strategic Bitcoin Stock.” The idea would be for this stock to function as a kind of financial backup, a safeguard for the American economy.
At first glance, it may even sound interesting. After all, Bitcoin is limited (only 21 million can be mined), and this could be seen as an advantage compared to the dollar, which can be printed by the government as needed. But in practice, this view ignores the real problems of Bitcoin, such as its lack of universal acceptance and high price instability.
The Dollar Already Dominates — Without Help From Bitcoin
One thing often forgotten in this debate is that the dollar is already the dominant currency in the global financial system. It is used in international transactions, foreign exchange reserves, and as a reference for commodity prices, such as oil. This position did not come out of nowhere: it is the result of decades of international trust and the economic strength of the U.S. For Selgin, Bitcoin could not contribute to reinforcing this position. On the contrary, betting on such a volatile asset could even undermine trust in the American financial system.
This doesn’t mean that Bitcoin is bad. It has its role in the market, primarily as an alternative for those seeking to diversify investments or escape from centralized financial systems. But turning it into the basis of a strategic reserve in the U.S., or any other country, seems more like a dream than a practical solution.
The concept of “digital gold” may even be appealing but is still far from becoming a reality. Unlike gold, which has centuries of acceptance and stability, Bitcoin is still in its infancy, both in terms of adoption and regulation. Furthermore, it faces criticism for its environmental impact and the lack of security on some trading platforms.
Does The Dollar Really Need The “Digital Gold”?
The idea of using Bitcoin to save or strengthen the dollar in the U.S. is, at the very least, controversial. As Selgin points out, the dollar is already strong enough thanks to global trust and American economic stability. Betting on such a volatile asset as Bitcoin could, in fact, bring more problems than solutions.
In the end, Bitcoin may continue to be the darling of many investors and technology enthusiasts. But, at least for now, it is still far from being the “digital gold” that will change the rules of the global economic game.
And you, what do you think? Can Bitcoin one day reach the level of gold as a store of value? Or is this idea of “digital gold” just another exaggeration in the world of cryptocurrencies? Leave your opinion in the comments, we want to know what you think!
This article was based on the text published by the Cato Institute, written by George Selgin, and does not necessarily reflect the author’s opinion. The complete article can be accessed directly on the Cato Institute’s website.
-
1 person reacted to this.