Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
Billionaire Allegedly Hidden Stock Purchases to Avoid Price Increase, Causing US$ 150 Million Loss to Investors; SEC Denounces Strategy Used by Elon Musk in Twitter Acquisition.
Elon Musk, the eccentric billionaire and CEO of giants like Tesla and SpaceX, is once again embroiled in controversy. This time, he faces accusations of defrauding investors in the purchase of Twitter, now called X. Did he really evade the rules to profit more? Let’s explore this intriguing case that mixes business, laws, and, of course, Musk’s unique personality.
The Silent Stock Purchase of Twitter
In the financial market, major players like Musk need to follow a well-defined manual. One of these rules requires investors to notify the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when their stake in a company exceeds 5%. This prevents billion-dollar maneuvers from negatively impacting small investors.
However, Musk seems to have ignored this norm while increasing his stake in Twitter in 2022. He crossed the 5% threshold in March but only notified the authorities in April, when his share had already reached 9.2%. This strategic delay may have been the key piece to keep prices low while he continued buying.
-
New credit for Uber, 99, and taxi drivers can pave the way for car ownership, reduce the burden of car rental costs in their budget, and change the math for those who make a living from traffic every day.
-
Canadians are disappearing from the United States: The US feels the absence of Canada financially, while hotels, casinos, and tourist destinations try to attract visitors back with promotions.
-
WEG from Jaraguá do Sul was awarded in New York for strengthening relations between Brazil and the United States, employs over 2,250 people in American territory, operates 10 factories and 9 distribution centers in the country, and boosts the energy infrastructure of the U.S. with locally manufactured products and solutions.
-
Unclaimed funds will enter a new phase this Tuesday: banks must send funds to the government, while R$ 10.5 billion in idle funds could help finance Desenrola 2.0 and ensure debt renegotiation within the financial system.
Musk’s tactic appears to have been simple: keep silent to save money. By not disclosing his intentions, he avoided the market from reacting to the news, which would have driven up Twitter’s stock price. When the purchase was finally revealed, the stock surged 27%. According to the SEC, this resulted in an estimated loss of US$ 150 million for other investors.
The SEC Investigation: A Costly Move
The SEC is like a referee in the financial game, ensuring everyone follows the rules. In Musk’s case, the commission alleges that he broke the rule by not reporting his stock movements within the 10-day deadline after reaching a 5% stake. This omission is not just a technical infraction; it is seen as an attempt at manipulation.
The SEC’s complaint states that Musk’s strategy harmed small investors. The financial impact was significant: by hiding his purchases, he secured low prices for himself but left other investors unprotected when the market finally reacted. The regulator considers this a serious violation, although Musk’s attorney downplays the incident as an “administrative error”.
Musk’s Reaction: Attacks on the SEC and Justifications
As always, Musk did not waste time and used X to respond. He called the SEC “a completely broken organization” and questioned why the agency is focusing on him instead of dealing with more serious crimes. A typical response from the billionaire, who never backs down from controversy.
Alex Spiro, Musk’s attorney, dismissed the accusations as insignificant. According to him, it is a minor failure in completing a form, which, even if proven, would result in a minimal penalty. For Spiro, the SEC is simply trying to “harass” Musk in a campaign that has already lasted for years.
Political Context: Regulators versus Innovation
This scandal arises amid a turbulent political landscape. The SEC’s complaint was filed days before Donald Trump’s inauguration, who has supported reducing regulations in sectors like technology and finance. The clash between Musk and regulators reflects a larger struggle between innovation and government control.
Musk is no stranger to confrontations with agencies like the SEC, NASA, and FAA. For him, these institutions often hinder progress. But are his bold methods a way to break paradigms or just risky strategies to earn more money?
-
-
-
4 people reacted to this.