1. Home
  2. / Renewable Energy
  3. / Billion-Dollar Amendments Favor Thermal Power Plants and Threaten Lower Costs for Offshore Wind Energy in Brazil, Putting Billions of Reais at Stake and a Sustainable Future in Question
Reading time 3 min of reading Comments 0 comments

Billion-Dollar Amendments Favor Thermal Power Plants and Threaten Lower Costs for Offshore Wind Energy in Brazil, Putting Billions of Reais at Stake and a Sustainable Future in Question

Written by Valdemar Medeiros
Published on 03/12/2024 at 07:31
Foto: Usina eólica offshore/Idogram
  • Reaction
  • Reaction
2 people reacted to this.
React to this article

The Senate resumed its analysis last Tuesday (26) of the Bill proposing the legal framework for offshore wind energy, where amendments favor thermoelectric plants and may harm electricity generation on maritime platforms. The bill for Brazilian offshore wind energy was included on the agenda of the Infrastructure Services Commission meeting and, if approved in its current version, will impose a billion-dollar cost on electricity consumers in the country.

Understand the Impacts and Why Amendments Favor Thermoelectric Plants

The matter, which was on the agenda of the Senate’s Infrastructure Services Commission, was withdrawn for reexamination due to the inclusion of numerous parliamentary amendments, considered “jabuticabas” by experts. These amendments favor thermoelectric plants and, unrelated to the central theme of the proposal, foresee the allocation of billions of reais for the contracting of gas thermoelectric plants and the extension of contracts for coal plants.

The movement in Congress put members of the Brazilian offshore wind energy sector on alert. They considered the debate on the new legislation important for the country, however, now classify it as a bomb, turning against consumers of various consumption levels.

The billion-dollar expense for the Brazilian offshore wind energy sector was estimated last year by PSR, one of the most respected consulting firms. In a technical analysis, they indicated that consumers will be charged an additional R$ 25 billion per year until 2050, with an increase of 11% on the electricity bill.

The PSR calculation considers the impact of the so-called “jabutis”, parliamentary amendments that have no direct relation to the original text of the Brazilian offshore wind energy bill. 

Amendments Favor Thermoelectric Plants and Sector Experts Speak Out

In the Senate, the bill for the Brazilian offshore wind energy sector is reported by Senator Weverton de Sousa (PDT-MA). Members of the sector assess that there is a chance of the current text being approved in the commission and proceeding to a vote in the plenary soon.

The amendments favor thermoelectric plants, and criticism comes from various sector experts linked to entities, consulting firms, and independent institutes. For them, the National Congress overshadows the potential of Brazilian offshore wind energy in this new market and the positive aspects of the new legislation, which tend to attract new investors to the country.

If the current text is approved, the legal framework will create expenses for electricity consumers through a set of benefits directed at specific business groups operating within the electricity sector. The amendments favor thermoelectric plants and guarantee an additional period of 36 months for owners of renewable energy projects to access expired subsidies.

Can the Text Still Be Altered?

The Senator Weverton Rocha (PDT-MA), the rapporteur for the legal framework, signaled to interlocutors that he plans to adjust the project’s wording to facilitate a presidential veto of the jabutis inserted in the House.

The INFRA Agency states that the senator does not currently see a scenario in the House where he can gain support to clean the text and remove all unrelated topics to the main objective of the matter. The decision to maintain or not the jabutis would remain in the hands of the federal government, through a presidential veto.

The amendments favor thermoelectric plants, and the most controversial ones are present in articles 21 to 24. The strategy being considered by the parliamentarian would be to separate some measures that are in the same paragraph, so that the Executive Branch has options to cut only parts of the text. However, the parliamentarians would already be building an agreement to overturn any vetoes, according to sources.

Sign up
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
most recent
older Most voted
Built-in feedback
View all comments
Tags
Valdemar Medeiros

Formado em Jornalismo e Marketing, é autor de mais de 20 mil artigos que já alcançaram milhões de leitores no Brasil e no exterior. Já escreveu para marcas e veículos como 99, Natura, O Boticário, CPG – Click Petróleo e Gás, Agência Raccon e outros. Especialista em Indústria Automotiva, Tecnologia, Carreiras (empregabilidade e cursos), Economia e outros temas. Contato e sugestões de pauta: valdemarmedeiros4@gmail.com. Não aceitamos currículos!

Share in apps
0
I'd love to hear your opinion, please comment.x