Brazilian Offshore Wind Energy At Risk? Amendments Favor Thermoelectric Plants in Bill Project in Senate. Understand the Legal Framework Better and How It Can Impact Millions of Consumers.
The Senate resumed its analysis last Tuesday (26) of the Bill proposing the legal framework for offshore wind energy, where amendments favor thermoelectric plants and may harm electricity generation on maritime platforms. The bill for Brazilian offshore wind energy was included on the agenda of the Infrastructure Services Commission meeting and, if approved in its current version, will impose a billion-dollar cost on electricity consumers in the country.
Understand the Impacts and Why Amendments Favor Thermoelectric Plants
The matter, which was on the agenda of the Senate’s Infrastructure Services Commission, was withdrawn for reexamination due to the inclusion of numerous parliamentary amendments, considered “jabuticabas” by experts. These amendments favor thermoelectric plants and, unrelated to the central theme of the proposal, foresee the allocation of billions of reais for the contracting of gas thermoelectric plants and the extension of contracts for coal plants.
The movement in Congress put members of the Brazilian offshore wind energy sector on alert. They considered the debate on the new legislation important for the country, however, now classify it as a bomb, turning against consumers of various consumption levels.
-
Europe has never produced so much clean energy at the start of a year — 384.9 TWh of renewables in the first quarter of 2026 broke all records, and fossil generation fell to its lowest level.
-
For the first time in history, solar and wind energy supplied more electricity than all global demand growth — and fossil generation fell to its lowest level in 100 years.
-
Renewable energy surpasses coal for the first time and marks a historic turning point in the global electricity sector
-
Climate change should be combated by solar and wind energy — but extreme heat reduces the efficiency of panels, violent winds shut down the turbines, and extreme rainfall floods entire power plants.
The billion-dollar expense for the Brazilian offshore wind energy sector was estimated last year by PSR, one of the most respected consulting firms. In a technical analysis, they indicated that consumers will be charged an additional R$ 25 billion per year until 2050, with an increase of 11% on the electricity bill.
The PSR calculation considers the impact of the so-called “jabutis”, parliamentary amendments that have no direct relation to the original text of the Brazilian offshore wind energy bill.
Amendments Favor Thermoelectric Plants and Sector Experts Speak Out
In the Senate, the bill for the Brazilian offshore wind energy sector is reported by Senator Weverton de Sousa (PDT-MA). Members of the sector assess that there is a chance of the current text being approved in the commission and proceeding to a vote in the plenary soon.
The amendments favor thermoelectric plants, and criticism comes from various sector experts linked to entities, consulting firms, and independent institutes. For them, the National Congress overshadows the potential of Brazilian offshore wind energy in this new market and the positive aspects of the new legislation, which tend to attract new investors to the country.
If the current text is approved, the legal framework will create expenses for electricity consumers through a set of benefits directed at specific business groups operating within the electricity sector. The amendments favor thermoelectric plants and guarantee an additional period of 36 months for owners of renewable energy projects to access expired subsidies.
Can the Text Still Be Altered?
The Senator Weverton Rocha (PDT-MA), the rapporteur for the legal framework, signaled to interlocutors that he plans to adjust the project’s wording to facilitate a presidential veto of the jabutis inserted in the House.
The INFRA Agency states that the senator does not currently see a scenario in the House where he can gain support to clean the text and remove all unrelated topics to the main objective of the matter. The decision to maintain or not the jabutis would remain in the hands of the federal government, through a presidential veto.
The amendments favor thermoelectric plants, and the most controversial ones are present in articles 21 to 24. The strategy being considered by the parliamentarian would be to separate some measures that are in the same paragraph, so that the Executive Branch has options to cut only parts of the text. However, the parliamentarians would already be building an agreement to overturn any vetoes, according to sources.

-
-
2 people reacted to this.