Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
Former Google CEO Claims Remote Work Has Lost Priority and Points to the 996 Model With a 72-Hour Week as a Competitive Alternative.
Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, recently stated that remote work has ceased to be a priority for large companies and that the Chinese work model — the 996 — and 72-hour weekly schedules are more efficient. In an interview released this week, he argued that the home office culture weakens technology companies in the United States compared to Chinese discipline.
Schmidt believes that young professionals miss out on valuable learning opportunities outside of a physical environment and said that much of the knowledge he gained early in his career came from being physically in the office, listening to discussions and absorbing ideas.
He argued that, to compete with companies in China, “concessions” must be made in work-life balance.
-
Companies dismissed employees for just cause without evidence and are now paying compensation of up to R$ 100,000: TST establishes a thesis that presumes automatic moral damage when accusations of dishonesty are not confirmed.
-
The Federal Revenue Service is cross-referencing data from Pix, cryptocurrencies, and cashback from 46 million Brazilians for the 2026 income tax, and those who do not declare by May 29 may face a fine of up to 20% of the tax owed.
-
New studies prove that dogs have been living with humans for 15,800 years, before agriculture, and the discovery reveals how this relationship completely changed human survival.
-
Finer than a human hair and 200 times stronger than steel, graphene is moving out of laboratories and into construction sites, potentially creating buildings that bend without breaking, reduce carbon emissions by half, and are 3D printed like Lego pieces.
Criticism of Remote Work and Return to In-Person Work
Schmidt assessed that the remote work model dilutes the informal transmission of knowledge in the office, which harms mentors, apprentices, and junior teams.
He cited his experience at Sun Microsystems as an example: many professional learnings came simply from listening to debates and seeing colleagues deal with challenges at the workplace.
Furthermore, he stated that technology companies in the U.S. should “make sacrifices” to compete with China.
According to him, the balance between personal and professional life, advocated by many in the West, may be out of sync with the productivity mindset used by Chinese competitors.
What Is the 996 Model and How It Enters the Discussion
The 996 model requires employees to work from 9 am to 9 pm, six days a week — totaling 72 hours weekly.
It is a practice frequently adopted by technology companies in China as a symbol of dedication to rapid growth and competitiveness.
Although officially banned in 2021 by the Chinese Supreme Court, the 996 model still persists in the culture of some companies that defend it as a standard of discipline.
In Schmidt’s view, this type of demand can be “an example of discipline and competitiveness” for companies in the West that wish to accelerate results.
He believes that telework does not provide the ideal environment to build culture, engagement, and replicate creative processes.
Competitiveness with China and Risks of the 996 Model to Balance
One of Schmidt’s central arguments is that remote work weakens American tech companies compared to Chinese companies that maintain more demanding working conditions.
He asserts that major competitions, such as the race for artificial intelligence (AI), require commitment above professional comfort.
However, critics point out that the 996 model — by demanding exhausting work hours — can harm mental health, generate burnout, and exacerbate inequalities, especially among young graduates entering the job market.
Many question whether productivity really increases with so many hours worked or if it merely imposes disproportionate sacrifices.
Reactions from the Tech Market and Possible Impacts in Brazil
In Brazil and other Western countries, many companies have migrated to hybrid or remote models after the pandemic.
Schmidt’s statement represents a shift in thinking — a direct criticism of this flexibility.
If this discourse gains traction, there may be pressure for a return to in-person work, reduction of remote options, and a more rigid organizational culture.
In Brazilian tech companies, there are already debates about deadlines, deliverables, discipline, and performance, with managers questioning to what extent remote work allows the maintenance of culture and innovation.
It may also impact recent graduates, who see remote work as a way to enter the job market with fewer geographical barriers.
The discourse defending the 996 model could heighten tensions in the sector between efficiency, freedom, and quality of life.
Source: Xataka
Seja o primeiro a reagir!