Court of Santa Catarina Acquits Architect from Joinville for Failures in Work Altered Without His Authorization; Expert Confirmed That Problems Were Caused by Modifications Made by Third Parties
The 5th Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of Santa Catarina decided to exempt an architect from Joinville from liability for failures in a work remodeled without his authorization. The professional had only been hired to prepare the architectural project and did not participate in the execution.
The work was completed in 2017, but underwent changes made by the plaintiff and the executor of the renovation. These changes included the type of roofing and internal and structural modifications.
The plaintiff claimed that, after the changes, defects such as leaks, water damage, and damage to walls and ceilings emerged, rendering the property uninhabitable.
-
A man takes a simple farm cattle trough and transforms it into a fully motorized boat by lining the tank with plywood, sealing everything with epoxy, and installing an outboard motor.
-
In just 24 days, China erected 7,733 foldable houses alongside nearly 10,000 tents and sheltered over 47,000 residents in one of the highest and most inhospitable regions on the planet, in what is considered the fastest housing deployment in history.
-
With an eye on consumers from Santa Catarina, Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, and Argentina, Havan is launching a mega store worth R$ 90 million on the side of a busy highway, in an investment that Luciano Hang classifies as one of the most important in the expansion.
-
Thousands of houses in Brazil have slabs and pillars concreted with construction site mixers, and most owners are unaware that, without strict control of the dosage, this can compromise the structure’s strength and create risks that only appear years later, according to engineers and technical standards.
A technical expert analysis conducted in the process indicated that the structural problems were a direct consequence of the changes made without the architect’s knowledge.
According to the expert, the professional did not participate in the execution and only clarified specific doubts, without technical involvement in the reported problems.
The rapporteur of the case highlighted Article 621 of the Civil Code, which prohibits the owner of the work from modifying the original project without the author’s consent.
He also emphasized that the fact that the architect is the designer is not enough to attribute him responsibility for errors arising from unauthorized alterations.
“It is concerning to hold him jointly responsible when it has been conclusively proven in the records that there were substantial modifications to the original project without his full knowledge and approval,” stated the rapporteur.
During the process, the architect admitted to having made suggestions regarding finishes, but the court understood that this does not make him responsible for the structural failures. There was no evidence that he approved or participated in the changes made.
With the new decision, the TJ-SC overturned the previous sentence and removed the conviction of the architect. The responsibility for paying the compensation of R$ 183.9 thousand for material damages and R$ 5 thousand for moral damages was maintained only for the executor of the work.
With information from Conjur.

Be the first to react!