English 
6 min of reading 
0 comments 
The concrete mixer is not the villain of the story, but rather the lack of precise measurement of materials, especially water. Well controlled, concrete made on-site can be safe. The danger lies in improvisation with buckets and cans, which makes the resistance vary from one mix to another without anyone noticing.
Thousands of houses in Brazil have slabs and pillars concreted with the construction site mixer, and most owners do not know that, without strict dosage control, this can compromise the structure’s resistance. According to engineers and technical standards, the risk is not in the mixer itself, but in the practical difficulty of ensuring the same resistance between one mix and another, which can cause problems that only appear years later after construction.
The warning has circulated in publications about civil construction and is based on consolidated concepts of structural engineering. First of all, it is important to avoid panic: having used a mixer on the construction site does not automatically mean that the house will collapse. The central point, as we will see, is the quality control of the concrete, and there are even ways to verify, after completion, if the structure meets what the project required, as guided by Brazilian technical standards.
What is fck and why is it so important
The fck is the characteristic resistance of concrete to compression, measured in megapascal (MPa), and each structural project calculates the pillars and slabs assuming that the concrete will reach a minimum value, usually between 20 and 25 MPa in residences.
-
Next to Brazil, a neighboring country is evaluating a 3.7 km underwater tunnel in one of the most extreme regions of America, a project initially estimated at US$ 1.5 billion that could end the dependency on ferries to reach Tierra del Fuego.
-
Asphalt that crumbled in less than a year is what the president of the Court of Auditors of Mato Grosso found when inspecting the MT-170, a highway whose most critical section cost about R$ 130 million to the public coffers and is now the subject of an audit on the quality and application of resources.
-
Instead of demolishing old coal warehouses, London doubled their roofs until they met in the center and created one of the most curious renovations in King’s Cross.
-
Duplication of SP-191 receives R$ 169 million, opens 17.5 km between Araras and Rio Claro, and improves strategic connection between Anhanguera and Washington Luís.
If the delivered concrete falls below this, the structure starts to work at the limit or beyond it.
A detail that few know is that the fck is not the resistance of a single isolated batch, but a statistical value: it ensures that the vast majority of samples will exceed that mark.
Without proper dosage control, this calculation simply does not hold up because there is no predictability about the actual strength that the concrete will achieve in each part of the construction, compromising the designed safety.
Why the construction site mixer is so unpredictable
The problem lies in the way concrete is usually made on site.
In the construction site mixer, materials are often measured with buckets, cans, and shovels, the moisture of the sand changes with each load, and the amount of water, which is the most critical factor for strength, is rarely measured accurately, causing the so-called water/cement ratio to vary from one mix to another.
And it is precisely this ratio that directly determines the final strength of the concrete.
Technological control studies have already documented significant variations in strength between batches produced on the same site, on the same day, and by the same workers.
Ready-mixed concrete, dosed at a plant and regulated by the ABNT NBR 7212 standard, solves this with dosage by weight and moisture control in the laboratory before each mix, ensuring much more consistency.
What the standards say: mixer is not prohibited
Concrete prepared on site is not prohibited, and the ABNT NBR 12655 standard itself allows the mix to be made on site, at a plant, or in a truck mixer, as long as the technical requirements for material measurement provided in NBR 7212 are respected.
In other words, with proper control, it is possible to produce quality concrete on site.
What makes mixer concrete risky in residential constructions is, in practice, the absence of this control, very common in small constructions, carried out without technical supervision and without resistance tests.
When there is a professional defining the mix, measuring the materials by weight, and molding test specimens, the scenario changes.
The villain, therefore, is not the equipment, but the improvisation in dosage.
The risks in pillars, beams, and slabs
Each part of the structure suffers differently when the concrete is inconsistent.
In the columns, which absorb the vertical load of the entire building, resistance below the design can lead to crushing failures under accumulated loads; in the beams, which work in flexion, invisible weak points appear; and in the slabs, fractional concreting can create cold joints between the mixes, which are discontinuities capable of reducing load capacity and promoting cracks.
The most dangerous thing is that these problems do not always appear immediately.
The structure may behave normally for years and only show signs of collapse when the loads increase, such as in the construction of a second floor over the house.
For this reason, the concrete mixer is considered suitable for elements that do not have a structural function, such as subfloors, sidewalks, fillings, partition walls, and small low-demand foundations, where variations in resistance do not put anyone at risk.
I’ve already concreted with a mixer: now what?
If the work has already been done this way, the good news is that there are ways to assess the situation.
The sclerometry test, regulated by NBR 7584, evaluates the surface hardness of hardened concrete without destroying the piece, and the extraction of cores, provided for in NBR 7680, allows samples to be broken in the laboratory to estimate the actual fck of the already executed structure, offering a technical diagnosis of what was built.
It is worth noting that sclerometry alone provides only a correlation, not the exact value of resistance, which is why it is usually combined with other tests.
The result should be delivered to a structural engineer, who will assess if the structure can withstand the project loads and may suggest reinforcements, such as jacketing of columns or the addition of reinforcement.
The cost of discovering a problem early is much lower than remedying it after a crack or settlement.
Why it is worth not economizing on the structure
In the end, this is one of those decisions that require prudence.
The structure of a house is, perhaps, the only element that does not have a second chance to be redone without an enormous cost, as it is embedded in the rest of the construction, making economizing during concreting a very high-risk bet in the long term.
More than choosing between a mixer and ready-mix concrete, what really matters is ensuring quality control and the supervision of a qualified professional, whether a civil engineer or an architect with technical responsibility.
This supervision ensures that the house will be safe to shelter a family for decades. This article is informative and does not replace the evaluation of a professional, who should always be consulted in concrete cases.
The warning about the use of a mixer in slabs and columns of houses is an invitation to awareness, not to despair.
The message from the experts is clear: the concrete of a structure needs dosage control and technical monitoring, whether it is mixed on-site or prepared at the plant.
For those who are yet to build, it’s worth planning this from the start; for those who have already built and have doubts, there are tests capable of evaluating the safety of the structure.
In the end, when it comes to the house where the family will live, understanding these precautions is worth more than any hasty savings.
And you, did you know that concrete made on-site can compromise the structure of the house if there is no dosage control? Have you ever experienced any problems with cracks or fissures in your construction? Leave your comment, share your experience with construction, and share this article with that friend or family member who is building or renovating and needs to know these precautions.
Be the first to react!