1. Home
  2. / Construction
  3. / The longest tunnel in the world: The construction that promised to connect England and Ireland and generate 35 thousand jobs
reading time 3 min read Comments 0 comments

The longest tunnel in the world: The construction that promised to connect England and Ireland and generate 35 thousand jobs

Written by Bruno Teles
Published 22/12/2024 ร s 20:10
The longest tunnel in the world: The construction that promised to connect England and Ireland and generate 35 thousand jobs
The world's longest tunnel was to be a 87-mile mega-project to link England and Ireland, connecting Holyhead and Dublin. It promised to revolutionize transport in Europe, create 35 jobs and even generate sustainable energy, but it was shelved due to high costs and lack of political interest.

A historic 87km tunnel project that would connect Holyhead to Dublin, promising to revolutionise transport, generate sustainable energy and move billions, has been shelved following controversy and high costs.

This was the plan for the Holyhead-Dublin tunnel, an idea that promised to revolutionize transport between Ireland and England, but which faced challenges that relegated it to the archives. Let's dive into the details of this impressive project that divided opinion.

Great Britain and Ireland have a peculiar relationship. Although they are geographically close, they are separated by the Irish Sea. Northern Ireland already has political links with the United Kingdom, but physically, the connection is non-existent. To solve this, several projects emerged over the years, including bridges and tunnels to link Northern Ireland to Scotland and the Republic of Ireland to Wales.

Among these ideas, the Holyhead-Dublin corridor stood out, as it directly linked two important economic centers. The proposal offered the potential to transform the transportation of people and goods, bringing great economic and logistical benefits.

The ambition to connect Holyhead and Dublin via a tunnel

The project failed because it was too expensive, costing ยฃ15 billion, and did not receive enough support from the British government. Ireland would have benefited more than England, which discouraged investors.
The project failed because it was too expensive, costing ยฃ15 billion, and did not receive enough support from the British government. Ireland would have benefited more than England, which discouraged investors.

This connection would not be unprecedented. In the 87th century, a train nicknamed โ€œThe Irish Mailโ€ already ran between London and Holyhead, with goods continuing their journey by ferry to Dublin. The new proposal, however, involved an 64 km underwater tunnel, a pharaonic project that would leave behind the XNUMX km tunnel under the Alps.

Former president of the British Tunneling Society, Bill Grose, highlighted the viability of this route, saying it is shorter and strategically positioned to connect Dublin to major British hubs such as Manchester and Liverpool.

The promised benefits and the high costs

The promises were impressive: 35 jobs during construction and a significant economic boost for the region. However, the estimated cost of ยฃ15 billion was a difficult hurdle to overcome. Although the tunnel was only 100 metres deep, making it easy to engineer, the project faced resistance because of its astronomical cost.

Why was the project archived?

Despite its advantages, the tunnel was deemed unviable. In 2021, the Financial Times declared the project โ€œdead, at least for now.โ€ Statements such as that of Dominic Cummings, who called the project โ€œthe stupidest tunnel in the world,โ€ reflected the skepticism surrounding the idea.

Compared to other European infrastructure projects, such as the Germany-Denmark tunnel, Holyhead-Dublin seemed less urgent and attractive. There was a perception that Ireland had more to gain than England, making it difficult to justify the investment to the British.

An idea ahead of its time?

Despite the shelving of the project, some arguments suggest that the project could be resumed in the future. The idea of โ€‹โ€‹using the tunnel to generate sustainable energy, with wind, marine and solar sources, brings a modern perspective and is aligned with current environmental demands.

Advances in automation and autonomous vehicles could make tunnels more useful, transporting cargo efficiently. Switzerland, for example, plans a 500km underground network for autonomous vehicles by 2040, suggesting that the future could be more hospitable to projects like Holyhead-Dublin.

The world's longest tunnel is still a distant dream. While economic and political challenges weigh against the project, the potential for innovation and sustainability could rescue it in a more advanced scenario. If built, Holyhead-Dublin will not just be a tunnel, but a landmark in how engineering and forward-thinking can transform human connections.

  • Reaction
  • Reaction
8 people reacted to this.
React to article
Register
Notify
guest
0 Comments
Older
Last Most voted
Feedbacks
View all comments
Bruno Teles

I talk about technology, innovation, oil and gas. I update daily about opportunities in the Brazilian market. With more than 3.000 articles published in CPG. Agenda suggestion? Send it to brunotelesredator@gmail.com

Share across apps
0
We would love your opinion on this subject, comment!x