Smart Glasses From Meta Are Gaining Ground Amid Legal Debates and AI Expansion Strategy, with a Forecast to Triple Sales in 2025 and Direct Comparison to the Historical Transition From Flip Phones to Smartphones.
Mark Zuckerberg was conducted to the Superior Court of Los Angeles on the morning of Wednesday, the 19th, where the Meta Ray-Ban glasses drew attention after the judge announced that any use for recording would result in contempt of court.
Zuckerberg arrived wearing a navy blue suit and tie, without glasses. Beside him were his long-time executive assistant, Andrea Besmehn, and an unidentified man wearing the Meta Ray-Ban glasses. The company declined to comment on the accessory.
Glasses in the Center of Judicial Alert
According to CNBC, the judge overseeing the trial declared that anyone using glasses to record inside the courtroom would be considered in contempt. The warning placed the glasses at the center of attention during the hearing.
-
Brazilian Army reaches a new level by receiving the first 100% national EOD robot to disarm explosives and reduce risks in UN missions; this unprecedented technology will be used by the 6th Combat Engineering Battalion in high-complexity operations.
-
Forget the traditional washing machine: Xiaomi surprises and launches a mini version with a double drum, 95°C sterilization, smart sensor drying, separate washing for underwear, integration with HyperOS, and a price equivalent to R$ 1,100 in China.
-
Brazilian company with 23,000 employees seeks humanoid robots in China and Japan to replace repetitive tasks in 1,400 restaurants, as the advancement of automation and the possible end of the 6×1 schedule transform the food sector.
-
Man confronts NASA astronauts and says the Artemis 2 mission was “staged” “Stop lying”: video shows accusations against crew that spent more than 10 days in space on a mission followed live by millions of people worldwide
The smart glasses with artificial intelligence were not only popular under the California sun. They also became a recurring topic of discussion in the courtroom amid the testimony of the Meta executive.
Previous History Involving Glasses
This is not the first time Meta’s glasses have generated controversy in a judicial setting. Last year, during antitrust accusations filed by the Federal Trade Commission against Meta, there was a similar incident.
The New York Times reporter, Mike Isaac, posted on X that he was reprimanded by the court for wearing Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses while covering the case. The report reinforced precedents involving the accessory in trials.
Trial on Platform Impact
The appearance of the glasses occurred when Zuckerberg testified in a case accusing major social media companies of creating products considered addictive and harmful to young users.
The case involves a 20-year-old plaintiff identified as KGM, who claimed that Instagram and YouTube exacerbated her depression and suicidal thoughts after use in childhood. TikTok and Snapchat settled, leaving Meta and YouTube as defendants.
The trial in Los Angeles focuses on design features that, according to the plaintiffs, encourage teenagers to endlessly scroll. Zuckerberg’s testimony followed an earlier presentation by Adam Mosseri, head of Instagram.
Meta’s Strategy for the Glasses
Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses have become, according to the company, an unexpected success. In a results conference last month, Zuckerberg stated that sales would more than triple by 2025.
He compared the moment to the transition from flip phones to smartphones. Meta has positioned the glasses as a central part of its ambitions in AI, expanding integrated functionalities to the device.
In addition to taking photos and playing music, users can ask Meta AI questions about anything visualized through the glasses. Last week, the New York Times reported that the company plans to add facial recognition technology.
The combination of commercial growth, AI integration, and judicial debates has reinforced the presence of the glasses in recent news. The accessory, which emerged as a tech item, has now become part of legal, business, and regulatory discussions in the context of the Los Angeles trial, marking a new chapter in the public use of smart devices.

Be the first to react!