Fuel Consumption Is No Longer a Detail and Now Defines Which Car Fits Your Budget
With fuel prices soaring and the economy unstable, fuel consumption is no longer a detail: today it directly impacts the driver’s wallet. A survey by Inmetro, based on the Brazilian Vehicle Labeling Program (PBEV), revealed the 10 cars up to R$ 150,000 with the worst fuel efficiency in 2025.
The list, which considers energy consumption in megajoules per kilometer (MJ/km), exposes a reality: even in times of electrification, many of the least efficient cars are still SUVs and pickups, precisely the segments that have grown the most in Brazil, according to Autoesporte.
10th) Peugeot 2008 – 1.66 MJ/km
The French SUV delivers a good technological package but disappoints in efficiency, especially in urban use with ethanol.
-
Fiat launches the new 2027 Toro hybrid with 48V, 176 hp, an electric motor of 15.5 hp, a 0.85 kWh battery, up to 7% fuel savings, 8% fewer emissions, and possible exemption from IPVA.
-
Used automatic cars from Hyundai that are reliable, offer comfort, good performance, and cost between R$ 45,000 and R$ 75,000.
-
Electric car surprises on the Transamazon Highway as it tackles a mud pit; Saveiro and Hilux get stuck and need to be pulled out, while a milk truck crosses alongside with ease and draws attention.
-
The war in Iran could be the push needed for the electric vehicle market to truly explode because when the price of oil exceeds 100 dollars a barrel, combustion cars become a luxury, and China already dominates 60% of the global electric market.
- Version: Active
- Price: R$ 143,990
- Consumption (Inmetro): 12 km/l (city); 14.1 km/l (highway) – gasoline | 8.5 km/l (city); 9.8 km/l (highway) – ethanol
- Engine: 1.0 with 130 hp and 20.4 kgfm
9th) Nissan Versa – 1.69 MJ/km
The Japanese sedan pleases with comfort and space but loses competitiveness in fuel consumption, especially with ethanol.
- Versions: All
- Price: starting at R$ 117,990
- Consumption (Inmetro): 11.5 km/l (city); 15 km/l (highway) – gasoline | 7.9 km/l (city); 10.5 km/l (highway) – ethanol
- Engine: 1.6 flex with 113 hp and 15.3 kgfm
8th) Chevrolet Tracker – 1.71 MJ/km
Among the best-selling SUVs, the Tracker could deliver more efficiency: its numbers fall below expectations for a 1.0 turbo.
- Version: AT
- Price: R$ 119,000
- Consumption (Inmetro): 11.5 km/l (city); 13.8 km/l (highway)
- Engine: 1.0 turbo flex with up to 115.5 hp and 18.9 kgfm
7th) Nissan Kicks – 1.77 MJ/km
Popular on Brazilian streets, the Kicks disappoints those seeking economy: its ethanol consumption is among the worst among compact SUVs.
- Versions: All
- Price: starting at R$ 117,990
- Consumption (Inmetro): 11.3 km/l (city); 13.7 km/l (highway) – gasoline | 7.8 km/l (city); 9.4 km/l (highway) – ethanol
- Engine: 1.6 with 113 hp and 15.3 kgfm
6th) Citroën C3 Aircross – 1.80 MJ/km
Recently launched and focused on interior space, the C3 Aircross lacks efficiency, becoming costly for those who drive a lot.
- Versions: All
- Price: starting at R$ 112,990
- Consumption (Inmetro): 11.2 km/l (city); 13 km/l (highway) – gasoline | 7.9 km/l (city); 9.1 km/l (highway) – ethanol
- Engine: 1.0 with 130 hp and 20.4 kgfm
5th) Volkswagen Saveiro – 1.83 MJ/km
Even being smaller than other pickups, the Saveiro disappoints in fuel economy, showing numbers close to larger utility vehicles.
- Versions: All
- Price: starting at R$ 109,490
- Consumption (Inmetro): 11.2 km/l (city); 12.9 km/l (highway) – gasoline | 7.7 km/l (city); 8.8 km/l (highway) – ethanol
- Engine: 1.6 with 116 hp and 15.4 kgfm
4th) Jeep Renegade – 1.84 MJ/km
Beloved among SUVs, the Renegade comes at a price: the robust design and 1.3 turbo engine are accompanied by high fuel consumption.
- Versions: Sport and Altitude
- Price: starting at R$ 118,290
- Consumption (Inmetro): 11.1 km/l (city); 12.4 km/l (highway) – gasoline | 7.8 km/l (city); 8.9 km/l (highway) – ethanol
- Engine: 1.3 with 176 hp and 27.5 kgfm
3rd) Chevrolet Spin – 1.87 MJ/km
A practical option for families and rideshare drivers, the Spin offers space and versatility but requires frequent visits to the gas station.
- Versions: AT, LT (MT and AT), and LTZ
- Price: starting at R$ 119,900
- Consumption (Inmetro):
- AT, LT AT, and LTZ: 10.5 km/l (city); 13.4 km/l (highway) – gasoline | 7.4 km/l (city); 9.3 km/l (highway) – ethanol
- LT MT: 11 km/l (city); 12.5 km/l (highway) – gasoline | 7.7 km/l (city); 8.6 km/l (highway) – ethanol
- Engine: 1.8 with 111 hp and 17.7 kgfm
2nd) Renault Oroch – 1.91 MJ/km
The intermediate pickup from Renault combines versatility with competitive prices but loses significantly in energy efficiency.
- Versions: Pro and Intense
- Price: starting at R$ 126,690
- Consumption (Inmetro): 11.3 km/l (city); 11.7 km/l (highway) – gasoline | 7.6 km/l (city); 8.1 km/l (highway) – ethanol
- Engine: 1.6 with 112 hp and 15.6 kgfm
1st) Caoa Chery Tiggo 5x – 2.06 MJ/km
The negative champion of the list: the Tiggo 5x delivers the worst fuel consumption among models priced up to R$ 150,000, reaching only 6.5 km/l in urban ethanol use.
- Versions: Pro and Sport
- Price: R$ 119,990
- Consumption (Inmetro): 10 km/l (city); 12.1 km/l (highway) – gasoline | 6.5 km/l (city); 8.4 km/l (highway) – ethanol
- Engine: 1.5 turbo flex with 150 hp and 21.4 kgfm
Do you have one of these in your garage or do you prefer to bet on a more economical model?

-
-
2 pessoas reagiram a isso.