Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
6 min of reading 
0 comments 
Salmon exposed to cocaine and benzoylecgonine in an experiment in Lake Vättern, Sweden, began to swim greater distances, occupy different areas, and change their behavior, in a result that reinforces the environmental risk of the presence of illegal drugs and chemical waste in natural aquatic environments
The salmon became the target of an unusual experiment in Sweden after a team of scientists decided to test, in a natural environment, how exposure to cocaine and the main metabolite of the substance could alter the behavior of aquatic fauna. In total, 105 juvenile fish from aquaculture were divided into groups, received special implants, and were then released into Lake Vättern in the south of the country, where they were monitored for eight weeks.
The result drew attention because the salmon exposed to the substances began to cover much greater distances than the control group fish. The animals that received cocaine swam, on average, five kilometers more, while those exposed to benzoylecgonine swam almost 14 extra kilometers. For the researchers, this shows that drug residues found in rivers and lakes can alter the behavior of fauna and cause broader effects on entire ecosystems.
What the scientists did with the salmon in Sweden
The experiment was conducted by researchers affiliated with Griffith University, the Zoological Society of London, the Max Planck Institute, and other institutions. The aim was to understand what happens to aquatic fauna when it comes into contact, under natural conditions, with chemical substances that are already found in rivers and lakes around the world.
-
A mysterious golden ball found 3,200 meters deep in the ocean intrigued scientists for two years until DNA sequencing revealed that it came from an unexpected giant animal.
-
Astronauts who spend long periods in space develop flattening of the eyeball, swelling of the optic nerve, and retinal folds, a risk that already affects up to 70% of crews and still has no pharmacological treatment proven in flight.
-
Heavy rainfall is already forecast to hit the Northeast this Thursday, April 23rd, and the peak of instability could cause up to 100 mm of accumulated rainfall with winds of up to 100 km/h in coastal areas, advancing across almost the entire region.
-
Table tennis robot with artificial intelligence surprises by defeating elite human athletes and raises an unexpected question about the future of sports.
To do this, the salmon were divided into three groups. One group received implants that slowly released cocaine into their bodies. Another group received similar devices, but with benzoylecgonine, the main metabolite of cocaine. The third group received no substance and served as the control for the research.
How the experiment was set up and monitored in the lake
After preparation, the salmon were released into Lake Vättern. All were juveniles and carried a tracking system that allowed scientists to monitor their movements with the help of sensors installed around the lake.
This monitoring lasted eight weeks. During this period, the researchers were able to measure the distance swum by each group and compare how exposure to the substances influenced the movement, dispersion, and space usage by the fish in a real environment.
The numbers that explain why the study drew so much attention
The data from the experiment helps to understand the impact of exposure. The salmon that received cocaine swam on average five kilometers more than the unexposed fish. Those that received benzoylecgonine had an even stronger response and swam almost 14 extra kilometers.
According to Griffith University, the fish exposed to the metabolite swam up to 1.9 times farther per week than the unexposed fish and dispersed up to 12.3 kilometers farther. The effects also became more evident over the days, suggesting an increasing impact of the substance on the animals’ behavior.
Why benzoylecgonine worried more than cocaine itself
One of the most important points of the study was the difference between the action of cocaine and that of the metabolite. Although cocaine altered the movement of the salmon, benzoylecgonine caused even deeper changes in the movement and behavior of the fish.
This gained extra weight because, according to the researchers, this metabolite is found in higher concentrations in nature. In other words, the substance that most altered the fish may be one of the most present in contaminated aquatic environments, which amplifies the environmental alert.
What changes in practice when salmon swim more and spread more
At first glance, the fact that salmon swim greater distances may seem like just a curiosity. But scientists themselves highlight that this is much more serious than it appears. When fish occupy different areas, they also change the places where they feed, the risks they face, and the way they interact with other species.
More movement also means more energy expenditure. This forces animals to seek more food to compensate for the physical effort, which can alter the dynamics of entire populations. In other words, an individual change in behavior can end up reflecting on the structure of the entire ecosystem.
Why drugs in rivers can affect much more than a single animal
The study reinforces a concern that has been growing among researchers: the presence of illicit drugs, pharmaceuticals, and other chemical substances in rivers affects not only water quality but also the behavior of wildlife.
Salmon served as a concrete example of this problem in a natural environment. According to scientists, if contamination is altering how fish move, feed, and occupy space, then the impact can reach entire ecosystems in ways that are just beginning to be understood.
What was known before and what this study managed to show again
Previous research had already detected traces of cocaine, ketamine, and other compounds in aquatic environments and in organisms exposed to this type of contamination. Scientists also knew that some substances could change the behavior of wild species in the laboratory.
The advancement of this study lies in the fact that it took the investigation into a natural environment. Instead of observing salmon under isolated conditions, researchers followed the fish in the same type of setting where the fauna actually lives, making the results more relevant for understanding the ecological impact of chemical pollution.
Why the experiment required so much care
According to researchers, the study was conducted under safe conditions for both the ecosystem and humans. Even so, obtaining the necessary permits to carry out such an experiment was not simple.
Scientists reported that the process to obtain authorization was laborious. This helps to show why research in natural environments is still rarer, even when it can provide answers closer to the reality faced by wildlife.
What researchers want to discover now
After the results, scientists advocate for new studies to better understand the consequences of drug contamination in rivers, lakes, and seas. The main concern now is to deepen the understanding of the role of metabolites and derivatives of these substances, which may be underestimated in environmental assessments.
In the case of salmon, the experiment showed that ignoring compounds like benzoylecgonine could mean overlooking an important part of the risk to which these animals are exposed. For researchers, this paves the way for a broader review of how chemical pollution is being measured and interpreted in nature.
Why this study goes beyond scientific curiosity
The image of salmon doped with cocaine may seem unusual, but the study was not conducted to generate shock. The goal was to answer a relevant environmental question: what happens to wildlife when drugs and chemical waste reach waterways?
The answer, at least in this case, showed that the effect can be profound, cumulative, and capable of disrupting the organization of the ecosystem. The Earth already coexists with rivers contaminated by compounds produced by human activity, and fish are now helping to show that the consequences of this contact may be greater than previously thought.
In your opinion, should studies like this pressure governments and cities to treat the dumping of chemical substances and drugs into rivers more rigorously?
Be the first to react!