Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
5 min of reading 
0 comments 
Bite marks on foot bone help scientists understand how tyrannosaurs utilized carcasses over 75 million years ago
A fossilized bone found in Montana, United States, revealed a behavior little remembered when talking about tyrannosaurs. The analysis indicates that a smaller tyrannosaur fed on the carcass of a much larger relative, gnawing down to an area with little meat.
The discovery reinforces the idea that these large Cretaceous predators did not rely solely on active hunting. They could also act as opportunistic scavengers, taking advantage of dead animal remains when food was available.
The study draws attention because the marks appear on a metatarsal, a foot bone, a part that is not very attractive if the carcass were still fresh. This suggests that the animal arrived at the remains in an advanced stage of decomposition, when much of the meat had already been consumed.
-
After 16 years trying to bring the bus he bought in Canada, Walderley Saldanha, from Paraná, returned to Maringá without it: the vehicle is being held in Veracruz due to an inconsistency in the serial number, and the couple is looking for a lawyer to resolve the issue.
-
Government issues alert for those with old RG, and the document will no longer be accepted in Brazil; the new ID will have a single CPF, QR Code, and a digital version on Gov.br.
-
Rota Panamericana impresses the world with over 30 thousand kilometers crossing 14 countries, revealing incredible landscapes, extreme challenges, and one of the most epic journeys ever created in the history of the Americas.
-
A Greek island with about 45 residents is looking for new families: it offers a house, land, basic food, and €500 per month for 3 years to try to prevent Antikythera from disappearing off the map.
The research was conducted by Josephine Nielsen, from Aarhus University, Denmark, and published in the scientific journal Evolving Earth in January 2026.
Bite marks show that the bone was gnawed after the animal’s death
The analyzed fossil presents 16 bite marks distributed on the foot bone of a large tyrannosaur. The absence of healing signs was one of the central points of the analysis, as it indicates that the bites occurred after the animal’s death.
In paleontology, this detail makes a difference. When a bone is damaged while the animal is still alive, there can be a biological reaction and signs of recovery. Since this did not appear in the fossil, the strongest hypothesis is that the smaller tyrannosaur was feeding on a carcass.
The location of the bites also strengthens this interpretation. The foot has little meat compared to other body parts, such as the tail, legs, and torso. Therefore, gnawing on this region may indicate a final phase of utilization, when the most accessible food had already disappeared.
This interpretation transforms the fossil into a kind of frozen record of behavior. It’s not just about knowing that one animal bit another, but about understanding in what context the bite occurred and what that reveals about the ecology of dinosaurs.
Tyrannosaurs were not just hunters and could utilize any food source
The popular image of tyrannosaurs often associates these animals with dominant predators, always hunting large prey. The new discovery does not eliminate this role but shows a more practical side of survival in the Cretaceous.
Large modern carnivores can also alternate between hunting and scavenging. Lions, hyenas, crocodiles, and other predators take advantage of remains when the opportunity arises. With tyrannosaurs, the behavior may have followed a similar logic.
The study indicates that these animals did not waste resources, not even when only hard bones and little meat remained. In a competitive environment, any source of energy could be important.
This point helps make the discovery relevant. It doesn’t just show an isolated episode but contributes to understanding how tyrannosaurids competed for food, occupied the top of the food chain, and survived in ecosystems full of other large animals.
Discovery does not confirm T. rex meal and points to a larger relative
An important detail is that the discovery involves tyrannosaurs, but does not confirm that the carcass was from a Tyrannosaurus rex. The fossil is over 75 million years old, while the classic T. rex lived later, near the end of the Cretaceous.
Therefore, the more precise interpretation is that a smaller tyrannosaurid fed on a larger relative, possibly from a closely related taxon or the same group. This distinction avoids confusion between the famous T. rex and other members of the tyrannosaur lineage.
Still, the discovery is relevant for understanding the behavior of the group as a whole. Tyrannosaurids included animals of different sizes and shapes, many of them also adapted to bite forcefully and exploit meat, bones, and prey remains.
The analysis of the spacing and shape of the marks suggests that the animal responsible for the bites was smaller than the owner of the bone. The pattern does not appear random, but rather compatible with the teeth of a smaller tyrannosaur gnawing on a large carcass.
3D Technology Helped Transform a Small Fossil into Scientific Evidence
The analyzed bone is about 10 centimeters long and was found in the Judith River Formation, Montana. This region is known for preserving fossils of an ancient Cretaceous ecosystem, with important records of dinosaurs and other prehistoric animals.
As transporting the original fossil to Denmark would be risky, the researcher worked with a digital version and a 3D-printed copy. This strategy allowed for precise observation of the material without endangering the original piece.
The technology helped measure the depth, angle, and position of the marks. As a result, the analysis no longer relied solely on the general appearance of the bone and began to use more objective criteria.
This type of tool has been gaining ground in paleontology. Digital models allow for magnifying details, comparing marks, and sharing data between teams without moving rare or fragile fossils.
In the case of this study, the technique was decisive in supporting the interpretation that the bites were made by a smaller tyrannosaur on a larger carcass. The result brings paleontological investigation closer to forensic analysis, where small clues help reconstruct a scene that occurred millions of years ago.
Fossil Broadens Debate on Cannibalism and Scavenging Among Dinosaurs
The discovery also rekindles an old discussion about cannibalism among carnivorous dinosaurs. When an animal feeds on a close relative or member of the same group, the episode can be interpreted as intraspecific consumption or, more broadly, feeding among close evolutionary relatives.
However, the study does not indicate a direct fight between the two animals. The absence of healing and the position of the marks favor the hypothesis of carcass consumption, not an attack during life.
This difference is essential to avoid overstating the discovery. The fossil does not prove that tyrannosaurs regularly hunted larger relatives, but it shows that they could take advantage of their remains when they found an available carcass.
The finding reinforces a less romanticized view of dinosaurs. Instead of monsters always in combat, they were animals integrated into complex ecosystems, subject to hunger, competition, opportunity, and decomposition, as occurs in nature today.
The new interpretation also shows how small fossils can answer big questions. A single foot bone, marked by bites, helped reveal how giant predators dealt with scarce food and leftover remains.
Ultimately, the discovery poses an uncomfortable question for those who grew up seeing tyrannosaurs only as relentless hunters. Were they kings of the hunt or opportunistic survivors who ate even the last remains when they had to? Leave your comment and tell us if this discovery changes how you imagine these prehistoric predators.
Be the first to react!