1. Home
  2. / Economy
  3. / A Brazilian municipality relies on 97% federal money, has 14 secretariats, 11 councilors, and a budget of R$ 131 million, but only 915 people are formally employed, and no one knows how the other 25,000 live.
Reading time 4 min of reading Comments 0 comments

A Brazilian municipality relies on 97% federal money, has 14 secretariats, 11 councilors, and a budget of R$ 131 million, but only 915 people are formally employed, and no one knows how the other 25,000 live.

Written by Bruno Teles
Published on 16/04/2026 at 20:58
Seja o primeiro a reagir!
Reagir ao artigo

Turilândia is located in the northwest of Maranhão, has 33,219 inhabitants according to the IBGE, collects less than R$ 5 million per year with its own revenue, and still maintains a complete public structure with a mayor, vice, a council with 11 councilors, and 14 secretariats, all funded by federal transfers.

The city’s numbers depict an economy that practically does not exist on paper. There are 915 people with formal work ties, 220 registered as MEI, and 584 public servants. Another 5,572 people receive Bolsa Família. The remaining 25,000 inhabitants do not appear in any of these categories. The municipality’s HDI is 0.536, considered low on a scale of 0 to 1, and the per capita GDP places Turilândia in the 5,558th position among Brazilian municipalities, among the 15 worst in the country.

Even so, the Budget Law for 2025 anticipated that the city would receive R$ 131 million in current transfers. In 2024, public expenses exceeded R$ 167 million. More than 97% of everything that comes in is from outside: Municipal Participation Fund, constitutional transfers, and parliamentary amendments. Wealth generated in other parts of Brazil and redistributed to a city that hardly produces.

How a municipality spends R$ 131 million per year without generating its own wealth

Municipality in Maranhão receives R$ 131 million per year, has 14 secretariats and 11 councilors, but only 915 people work with a formal contract. Understand the system.

The Brazilian federal model ensures that every municipality receives money from the Union, regardless of how much it collects locally.

This is the so-called Municipal Participation Fund, created by the 1988 Constitution.

In practice, a city can maintain a mayor, council, and secretariats functioning entirely with this transfer, without needing to charge almost anything from the local population.

There is a phenomenon studied in public economics called the flypaper effect: when money comes from outside instead of coming from the pockets of those who live there, the government tends to spend more and no one controls it.

In Turilândia, the city council consumes R$ 2.8 million per year.

The budget allocated for public safety, in one of the most violent cities in Maranhão (11th in intentional lethal crimes in 2021), is R$ 72,000 per year.

The council costs 39 times more than all the security of the municipality.

Why 25 thousand people from Turilândia do not appear in any economic statistics

Municipality in Maranhão receives R$ 131 million per year, has 14 secretaries and 11 councilors, but only 915 people work with a formal contract. Understand the system.

Adding all formal links (915), MEIs (220), public servants (584), and Bolsa Família beneficiaries (5,572), Turilândia has about 7,300 people with some identifiable source of income.

The city has 33 thousand inhabitants. The other 25 thousand are not in any of these categories.

They probably live from informal work, subsistence agriculture, or depend on someone who receives some benefit, but the fact is that they do not appear in the data.

This invisibility is not exclusive to Turilândia. In small municipalities with low own revenue, informality dominates and the real economy operates off the radar of any statistics.

The result is that no one knows for sure how much the city truly produces, how much it evades, and how much simply does not exist as formal economic activity.

But federal money continues to arrive every month, because the transfer does not depend on what the city produces.

Why Brazil maintains municipalities that cannot sustain themselves

Turilândia is not an isolated case. Next to it is Santa Helena, with its own city hall, council, and complete administrative structure.

The two city halls are 3.3 km apart and 40 km from the nearest city, Pinheiro.

Two public machines functioning side by side for populations that could be served by just one.

In Brazil, cities with less than 100 thousand inhabitants receive 85% of parliamentary amendments, even though they represent 42% of the population.

The more municipalities there are, the more political positions, budgets, and centers of power are created.

And when a municipality goes bankrupt, it cannot fail: the bill goes to the National Treasury, that is, to all taxpayers in the country.

The system was designed in a way that transfers money without requiring results, does not efficiently monitor, and distributes the loss to those who live far away and have never heard of Turilândia.

And in your city, do you know how much federal transfer arrives and how much is collected locally? Have you compared the council’s budget with that of public safety? Comment below.

Inscreva-se
Notificar de
guest
0 Comentários
Mais recente
Mais antigos Mais votado
Feedbacks
Visualizar todos comentários
Tags
Bruno Teles

Falo sobre tecnologia, inovação, petróleo e gás. Atualizo diariamente sobre oportunidades no mercado brasileiro. Com mais de 7.000 artigos publicados nos sites CPG, Naval Porto Estaleiro, Mineração Brasil e Obras Construção Civil. Sugestão de pauta? Manda no brunotelesredator@gmail.com

Share in apps
0
Adoraríamos sua opnião sobre esse assunto, comente!x