Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
5 min of reading 
2 comments 
Specialist Warns That Brazil May Face A Fiscal Collapse In 2027 If There Is No Agreement Among The Three Branches, Amid Debates On Tax Incentives, Tax Hikes, And Revenue Alternatives.
Brazil’s public accounts may collapse in 2027 if there is no understanding among the Three Branches to restore the fiscal balance, evaluates Rafael Furlanetti, president of the National Association of Securities Brokers (Ancord) and institutional managing partner at XP.
In an interview with CNN Money, from CNN Brazil, he argued that the establishment of a broad pact is essential to avoid the deterioration of the state’s finances.
Fiscal Warning And Pact Among The Branches
According to Furlanetti, the moment demands explicit cooperation among the Judiciary, Executive, and Legislative.
-
The largest home appliance manufacturer in the world closed its factory in Argentina and decided that Brazil will absorb everything, transferring machines, production, and supply of entire markets to the unit in Rio Claro, São Paulo, with an investment of nearly R$ 200 million.
-
The war in the Middle East has already cost Brazil $882 million in exports that did not leave the country in a single month, with pork falling by 59% and soybeans declining by 25%, and now the agribusiness sector is rushing to find new buyers before the losses double.
-
Amid international war, rising diesel prices, and a lack of workers, pork enters a new scenario in Brazil that could curb consumption, raise prices, and change the dynamics of the sector in the coming months.
-
The handshake that cost R$ 57 billion and started the delivery war in Brazil.
In his words, “everyone has to contribute: the Judiciary, Executive, Legislative. It’s time for everyone to give up part for the construction of a whole.”
His remarks particularly target the review of tax incentives and the coordination among branches to mitigate budget pressures.
Still in the interview, the Ancord leader emphasized that the participation of the private sector should not be limited to the defense of sectorial interests.
“If the economy does well, everyone will benefit. The businessman, the Executive, and, mainly, the Brazilian citizen,” he stated.
For him, the search for solutions must consider the macroeconomic impact and the sustainability of public spending.
Reaction To The Increase In IOF
The debate gained momentum after the government announced, at the end of May, an increase in the Tax on Financial Transactions (IOF).
The measure triggered an immediate reaction from the financial market and lawmakers, leading the economic team to revise part of the package.
Furlanetti assesses that the controversy can play a useful role in catalyzing discussions about state efficiency and alternative revenue sources without relying solely on tax increases.
For the president of Ancord, confrontations of this kind tend to generate additional proposals.
He summarized the movement with the metaphor: “from this lemon, we are making lemonade as other solutions appear, as Congress mobilizes with the Executive and tries to set agendas for short, medium, and long-term reforms for Brazil.”
The outlook is that, from the political confrontation, agendas for adjustments with different horizons emerge.
Sale Of Oil Surplus As Revenue
Among the alternatives mentioned by Furlanetti is the bidding for oil surplus as a way to bolster public funds and relieve the need for new taxes.
“It’s no ‘fiscal scheme’, it’s just auctioning the surplus,” he said, attributing a potential of up to R$ 20 billion in revenue to this route.
The idea is part of a set of measures to diversify the state’s financing sources and mitigate pressures on the tax burden.
Although it does not replace structural reforms, the sale of surpluses is pointed out as a short-term instrument to navigate a period of greater fiscal restraint.
In parallel, the specialist reiterates that the country needs to advance in measures of spending efficiency, review benefits, and simplify rules.
Impact Of Elections On Fiscal Debate
While the market pressures for predictability, the electoral calendar limits the space for sensitive voting.
The Planning Minister, Simone Tebet, has said that any adjustments to the fiscal regime should be discussed after 2026, regardless of the outcome of the presidential elections.
This is because the political environment on the eve of the election makes it difficult to approve measures that generate conflict in Congress.
“The window of opportunity is not now. We are on the eve of an electoral process, and Congress is not going to want to vote on something that is somewhat contentious,” he stated.
In the assessment of economic agents, defining a credible roadmap for the post-electoral period tends to reduce uncertainties.
Still, the warning for 2027 puts pressure on the branches to at least signal consensus at this moment.
Role Of Society And The Private Sector
With Congress more sensitive to the mood of voters in an election year, interlocutors advocate for segmented negotiations to advance what is feasible, such as adjustments to incentives and rationalization of expenses.
Furlanetti emphasizes that the private sector can also contribute by waiving specific claims when it blocks broader solutions.
The bet is that a minimum pact could already reduce the perception of risk and anchor expectations.
The specialist adds that society plays a relevant role in supporting, along with representatives, the importance of reforms that provide a more efficient state capable of delivering quality services.
By carrying this message to lawmakers, he assesses, it becomes more likely to build majorities for changes that traditionally face resistance.
Economic Impact Of Fiscal Uncertainty
The discussion about the balance of public accounts spills over into the real economy.
Companies need predictability to invest, plan hiring, and expand capacity.
Without this visibility, projects remain on hold, and the increase in financing costs makes long-term decisions more expensive.
Furlanetti argues that a consistent fiscal agreement— even if in stages— tends to unlock investments and improve the business environment.
In addition to revenue, the quality of spending emerges as one of the critical points.
The review of tax incentives and the pursuit of efficiency in existing programs, according to economists, can relieve pressures without necessarily imposing new taxes.
For the president of Ancord, this balance involves transparent choices and ongoing dialogue among branches, the private sector, and society.
Risk Of Collapse In 2027
While proposals are under discussion, the horizon of 2027 operates as a risk marker.
This is not a deterministic forecast but a warning about the trajectory of finances if nothing is done in a timely manner.
The reminder that “everyone has to contribute” serves, in this context, as an invitation to concertation.
The objective is to prevent the combination of insufficient revenues and rigid expenses from pushing the country into a scenario of critical imbalance.
The debate, therefore, is not restricted to technicians and investors. It affects the daily lives of families, companies, and public servants, who depend on a solvent state to maintain policies and services.
The next decisions, Furlanetti states, will indicate whether the country will be able to balance the fiscal issue with short-term measures aligned with a plan for medium and long-term.
Given this picture, one question remains: Will Brazil be able to reach a fiscal agreement before 2027 to avoid the collapse scenario pointed out by specialists?
Mercado sendo ”’o mercado”’ fazendo seu costumeiro ”’ terrorismo”’. Solução para o endividamento… leilão de excedente de petróleo, 20 bilhões, para uma divida de 7/8 trilhões. Selic a 15%, pagamos (dinheiro de nossos impostos) cerca de 1 trilhão juros/ano, pagos a quem??? Mercado financeiro. Não li na materia falarem sobre uma revisão na divida publica, cujo qualquer governo fica refem dessa extorsão feita pelo mercado.
Acho mesmo que o mercado deve cuidar melhor de seus clientes e deixar quem entende de finanças publicas cuidar disso.
Com relação a matéria, coloquem alguem para fazer um contra ponto sobre o assunto para os leitores terem uma melhor visão do assunto.
Eles o mercado e seus investidores, jamais falarão ao BC para diminuí a taxa Selic
Para ajudarem o País a crescer
Com a queda nos juros da Selic dos 15% para 10% ou até mesmo 8% ajudaria e muito essa discussão
Foi por isso que o governo anterior deu liberdade ao Banco Central
A de ferrar o governo e o Brasil