1. Home
  2. / Economy
  3. / Brazil and Russia want to build a financial bridge that dispenses with Western intermediaries by discussing an independent bilateral interbank infrastructure to facilitate trade in Russian fertilizers and fuels and Brazilian agricultural products, as part of the BRICS de-dollarization agenda.
Reading time 5 min of reading Comments 0 comments

Brazil and Russia want to build a financial bridge that dispenses with Western intermediaries by discussing an independent bilateral interbank infrastructure to facilitate trade in Russian fertilizers and fuels and Brazilian agricultural products, as part of the BRICS de-dollarization agenda.

Written by Bruno Teles
Published on 03/06/2026 at 15:33
Be the first to react!
React to this article

The idea is to allow payments between the two countries to run through their own channel, without going through systems controlled by the West. For now, it is a discussion between governments, not a ready system. But the size of trade, driven by fertilizers, diesel, meat, and coffee, shows why the topic interests both sides.

Brazil and Russia discuss the creation of an independent bilateral interbank infrastructure, a kind of financial bridge that would dispense with Western intermediaries in transactions between the two countries. The goal would be to facilitate the trade of strategic items, such as Russian fertilizers and fuels and Brazilian agribusiness products, within the broader agenda of de-dollarization advocated by BRICS countries, although the topic is still under negotiation between the governments.

The subject arose during the 13th Meeting of the Brazil-Russia Intergovernmental Commission on Economic, Commercial, Scientific, and Technological Cooperation, held on May 25, 2026, in Brasília. It is important to highlight that this is a discussion between the two countries, not an agreement already signed or a system in operation. The information about the interbank infrastructure was disclosed by the Russian government, through TV BRICS, and this report is limited to reporting the facts, without taking a stance on the political merit of the initiative.

What is the independent interbank infrastructure

The proposal has a practical objective at the center of the discussions. 

The idea of an independent bilateral interbank infrastructure is to create a dedicated channel for banks in Brazil and Russia to process payments directly, reducing dependence on international financial systems controlled by Western institutions, which would make commercial transactions faster and less subject to external barriers.

According to the Russian Minister of Economic Development, Maxim Reshetnikov, who co-chaired the meeting alongside the Secretary-General of Itamaraty, Ambassador Maria Laura da Rocha, the countries should advance in this mechanism and in reducing trade barriers.

It is worth remembering that the initiative still needs to be put into practice, and its eventual implementation will depend on technical, regulatory details, and political decisions that have not yet been defined.

The BRICS de-dollarization agenda

The topic is part of a larger movement on the international scene. 

Several BRICS countries, a group that includes nations like Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, have been advocating for initiatives to reduce dependence on the dollar in international trade and create alternatives to Western-dominated financial structures, such as the SWIFT banking messaging system, used in most global transactions.

The unique aspect of the discussions between Brazil and Russia, in this context, is the specific focus on a bilateral mechanism aimed at facilitating direct trade between the two countries.

It is important to emphasize, however, that the so-called de-dollarization is a complex topic that generates debate among economists, with proponents seeing it as a quest for autonomy and skeptics pointing out the enormous practical challenges of replacing the dollar, still the dominant currency in world trade.

Trade Driven by Agriculture and Energy

The numbers help to understand why the topic interests both sides.

In 2025, trade between Brazil and Russia reached about $10.9 billion, but in a very unbalanced way: Brazilian exports totaled $1.5 billion, while imports amounted to $9.4 billion, with a large concentration in the agribusiness and inputs sector, according to data presented at the meeting.

This imbalance is explained by the weight of Russian products in the agenda.

In 2025, Russia was the main external supplier of mineral fertilizers to Brazil, accounting for about 26% of the total imported, in addition to being an important supplier of diesel.

On the Brazilian side, exports of meat and coffee to the Russian market grew by 45% and 73%, respectively, compared to the previous year, showing the strength of the national agribusiness in this trade relationship.

Oil, Gas, and Other Negotiation Points

The bilateral agenda goes far beyond the financial system.

Among the topics discussed was Brazil’s interest in expanding purchases of petroleum derivatives and liquefied natural gas from Russia, as well as joint projects in the space and nuclear energy fields for peaceful purposes, reflecting the diversity of cooperation between the two countries.

The agenda also included the expansion of fertilizer trade, the simplification of procedures for drug registration, mutual recognition of good manufacturing practice certificates in the pharmaceutical industry, and the strengthening of scientific and technological cooperation.

According to the Russian minister, the participation of high-tech products in bilateral trade is expected to increase in the coming years, signaling an attempt to diversify a relationship currently very concentrated in commodities.

Why This Matters for Brazil

The unfolding of these discussions has practical effects on the Brazilian economy.

The dependence on imported fertilizers and fuels is a sensitive point for Brazil, especially for agribusiness, and mechanisms that facilitate this trade can impact production costs, prices, and supply, in a chain that goes from the field to the final consumer.

At the same time, any financial rapprochement with Russia occurs in a delicate geopolitical scenario, marked by Western sanctions on the country since the beginning of the war in Ukraine in 2022.

Therefore, initiatives like this are usually closely monitored both for their potential commercial benefits and for their diplomatic implications.

It is up to the Brazilian government to evaluate the paths it considers most appropriate to national interests, and up to the reader to form their own opinion based on the facts.

The discussions between Brazil and Russia about an independent interbank infrastructure are another chapter in the economic rapprochement between the two countries and the de-dollarization agenda advocated in BRICS.

Even though it is an ongoing negotiation and not a ready system, the topic reveals how global commercial and financial relations have been undergoing significant transformations.

For a country like Brazil, a major agricultural exporter and dependent on strategic inputs, keeping track of these movements with attention and critical sense is fundamental to understanding the directions of the economy in the coming years.

And you, what do you think of the idea of Brazil and Russia creating a financial system that dispenses with Western intermediaries? Do you believe that de-dollarization initiatives can really advance? Leave your comment, respecting different opinions, participate in the debate cordially, and share the article with those interested in economics, international trade, and geopolitics.

Sign up
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
most recent
older Most voted
Bruno Teles

I cover technology, innovation, oil and gas, and provide daily updates on opportunities in the Brazilian market. I have published over 7,000 articles on the websites CPG, Naval Porto Estaleiro, Mineração Brasil, and Obras Construção Civil. For topic suggestions, please contact me at brunotelesredator@gmail.com.

Share in apps
0
I'd love to hear your opinion, please comment.x