Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
6 min of reading 
2 comments 
The Postponement of Drex to 2026 and the Exclusion of Technologies Like Blockchain and Tokenization Changed the Central Bank’s Initial Proposal, Transforming the Digital Currency Into a Tool Restricted to the Financial System and Distancing Its Use by the Public.
The Central Bank postponed the first delivery of Drex to 2026 and reduced the project’s scope.
The initial phase will not include blockchain, tokenization, or direct access for the population.
Instead of circulating as “digital real” for everyday use, the platform will debut as an internal tool of the financial system, prioritizing the reconciliation of encumbrances, a mechanism that verifies whether guarantees used in credit operations are already tied to other commitments.
-
While Brazil pays a minimum wage of R$ 1,621, in Switzerland, Germany, France, and Belgium it reaches R$ 28,000, and Europe exposes the difference in workers’ earnings.
-
Low-wage workers are losing their PIS/Pasep without even realizing it because the government changed the adjustment rule, and anyone who receives any salary increase may lose eligibility for the benefit.
-
The end of a classic document caused a short circuit in the Receita Federal, and now over 1 million tax returns are stuck in the Income Tax audit due to errors that are not the taxpayers’.
-
A company that produces clothes for some of the world’s biggest brands invested R$ 14 million in Blumenau and will jump from 150 thousand to 450 thousand pieces per month in SC.
The announcement was made in August by the president of the Central Bank, Gabriel Galípolo, and lowers expectations built around a broad launch.
What Changes With the New Course of Drex
In its current setup, Drex stops being a programmable currency for retail and starts operating in the back-office banking.
The initial focus will be to reduce friction in verifying guarantees, a step that usually prolongs the credit granting process and raises information costs.
Although other functionalities are still under study, the monetary authority has not established a timeline to expand usage beyond the institutional environment. The shift also changes the narrative that linked Drex to the success of Pix.
If the payment arrangement became synonymous with rapid massification, the digital real adopts an incremental strategy, with controlled tests before any exposure to the public.
The ambition for international integration or reducing dependence on the dollar, cited in debates about central bank digital currencies, takes a back seat.
Why the Project Was Scaled Back
Experts point out that the decision reflects technological and regulatory caution.
The attempt to reconcile strict compliance requirements with technologies originally designed to function in a decentralized manner brought practical limitations.
Pedro Magalhães, an entrepreneur and creator of the fintech Pixley, sums up the difficulty: uniting the BC’s compliance with a base designed to operate outside the reach of central institutions has proven to be “extremely challenging.”
Despite advances in privacy solutions, the tested alternatives did not fully meet the security, confidentiality, and traceability standards required by the regulator.
Ricardo Teixeira, coordinator of the MBA in Financial Management at FGV, assesses that Brazil is at the forefront of the agenda but needs to calibrate expectations.
In his words, “for the population, given the volume of the economy, Drex’s technology needs to be something tested and retested. Perhaps they shouldn’t have created broader expectations.”
The comment reinforces the reading that the inaugural phase will be deliberately contained to reduce operational risks.
Political Pressure and Public Reaction
The change cannot be explained solely by technical criteria. In Congress, criticisms of the design of a CBDC centralized gained momentum.
Deputy Júlia Zanatta (PL-SC) introduced PL 3341/2024, which prohibits the extinction of cash, and filed a discussion on a constitutional amendment proposal to require qualified approval for any creation of central bank digital currency.
“Every time we gain to discuss is a victory,” said the parliamentarian. The movement exposes resistance from part of the electorate to an arrangement that allows for complete transaction tracking.
Cybersecurity on Alert
Another relevant factor is the environment of digital threats.
In July, large-scale attacks against financial institutions raised doubts about the timing of implementing an architecture supported by smart contracts.
For lawyer Victor Valente, an expert in blockchain and crypto assets, the combination of recent technologies, few professionals with proven experience, and high contract values increases the likelihood of incidents.
He notes that public officials could be held civilly, criminally, and administratively liable for unsuccessful contracts with poorly mastered technologies, an argument that, in his view, favors a more gradual implementation.
Although the Central Bank has not officially linked the attacks to the rollback on the use of blockchain in Drex, such incidents tend to raise the operational risk barrier for critical state projects.
In practice, the first delivery should prioritize layers with known governance and strict access control, postponing the adoption of more experimental components.
Transparency, Centralization, and Privacy
Even with the reduced scope, questions about centralization and traceability remain.
For Valente, the lack of public clarity about objectives and governance kept the debate alive.
The central criticism points out that, in a model entirely controlled by the Central Bank, the transaction history could be verifiable in detail.
Teixeira, from FGV, adds that even if the regulator imposes barriers, there will always be those who try to overcome them, which is why legal improvement is considered essential to safeguard user rights.
In contrast, advocates of the gradual approach remind that the BC’s infrastructure operates with audit trails, access controls, and prudential supervision, unlike open and permissionless networks.
Validation in a restricted environment would allow, in this logic, to mature security and privacy standards before any expansion to wholesale or retail use cases.
What is Drex and How It Was Redesigned
Drex is Brazil’s central bank digital currency project.
The original guidelines anticipated experiments with Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) and smart contracts, as well as the tokenization of assets, deposits, and cash itself, one-to-one with the real.
Unlike cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum, the proposal did not contemplate full decentralization: the network would be permissioned and under the command of the Central Bank, with functionalities for creating and extinguishing assets and the possibility of freezing wallets under specified circumstances.
With the redesign, the 2026 phase will exclude blockchain and tokenization.
The platform will serve as an internal rail for checking guarantees, with no wallet for citizens or programmable settlement between different types of assets.
Smart contracts, when present, will be beyond the short-term horizon.
Practical Effects for Banks and Clients
Initially, the end user will not see any novelty: there will be no Drex app, visible balance, or payments in digital real.
Changes occur behind the scenes, where banks and registrars will be able to automate encumbrance checks.
If successful, the measure may shorten timelines in operations with guarantees and reduce information costs.
The transmission of benefits to consumers will depend on competition and how the sector incorporates efficiency gains.
In the meantime, the ecosystem that invested in tokenization-based solutions will need to adapt products or redirect efforts to other projects until the BC resumes discussions on broader functionalities.
What to Observe From Now On
The Central Bank states that other utilities will continue to be developed, without a defined date.
The project’s progression will depend on technological maturity, the evolution of legislative debate, and the cybersecurity landscape.
International dialogue on interoperability standards between financial infrastructures will also weigh in, should Brazil advance in cross-border integrations in the future.
With this new design, the question is clear: in your view, will the more conservative strategy open up space for a more complete Drex or will it consolidate digital currency as a back-office solution for an indefinite time?
Imagina o tanto de ataque Hacker que vai ter isso, acho que todas as formas devem coexistir.
Edvaldo junior eu não gostei do drex para ficar monitorando nosso dinheiro . é pra agente usar o governo não tem nada ver fica monitorando nosso dinheiro