English 
Spanish 
5 min read
255 comments
Elon Musk's Starlink is at the center of a crisis in India after illegal antennas fell into dangerous hands. Authorities have discovered equipment used by criminals and smugglers in conflict zones and on the high seas. The government is questioning the company, which still does not have authorization to operate in the country. Find out what is behind this controversy!
Elon Musk, the billionaire behind technological innovations like Tesla's electric cars and SpaceX's reusable rockets, is facing a global security crisis with his satellite internet company, Starlink.
Despite promising to connect the most remote regions of the world, technology is at the center of a controversy that goes far beyond borders: smuggled antennas are being used by criminals, including in armed conflict zones.
Now with signs cut in india and questions about how the devices have been used illegally, an alert is raised not only for local authorities, but also for countries like Brazil, where Starlink technology is expanding rapidly.
- How Chinese scientists created an incredible method to track Musk's Starlink satellites in orbit and revolutionize space security
- How an 8-year-old's discovery of an ant revolutionized science
- China's energy weapon surpasses technological limits, firing pulses more powerful than nuclear explosions in tests
- Toyota promises to DOMINATE the sector with its new turbo engine, one of the most powerful in the world
After all, how can we prevent antennas from also being used for illegal activities in Brazilian territory?
The case of smuggled antennas in India
The controversy began when Indian authorities seized two Starlink antennas in operations carried out in regions of armed conflict.
According to the local government, terrorist groups were using the devices to access the internet and plan attacks against the Indian government.
Investigations revealed that this equipment arrived in the country through smuggling, mainly across the border with Myanmar, a country devastated by civil war where rebels also use the technology to organize actions against the government.
The case didn't stop there. In a second operation, methamphetamine smugglers were caught on the high seas using Starlink antennas to navigate and coordinate the transport of drugs.
These findings prompted the Indian government to send an official letter to Starlink with several questions about the control and security of its devices.
Faced with the concerns, Elon Musk used his social network X (formerly Twitter) to confirm that Starlink should not be operating in India.
According to the billionaire, the signal was never activated in the country due to the lack of official authorization to begin operations.
However, criminals are able to access the satellites thanks to the ease of activating the antennas, which are functioning normally even in areas without formal coverage.
The connection with Brazil: a warning to the authorities
In Brazil, Starlink's expansion has been rapid, with Elon Musk promising to connect rural schools and isolated communities through its satellite technology.
Despite the clear advantages, the case of India raises concerns about the risk of illegal use of these antennas in Brazilian territory.
Remote regions in the Amazon, for example, already face serious challenges related to organized crime, including drug trafficking, illegal mining and deforestation.
The ease of use of Starlink antennas could become a valuable tool for these groups to carry out illicit activities without being detected.
Furthermore, Brazil has a history of smuggling electronic equipment across its borders. As in India, trafficking in antennas via illegal routes can pose a security risk and even generate diplomatic difficulties.
To prevent the problem from recurring, experts suggest that the Brazilian government impose strict regulations on the use and import of these technologies, in addition to monitoring the application of services by Starlink.
Elon Musk and the issue of regulation
The crisis in India also highlights a problem faced by technology companies globally: the lack of clear regulation for services that operate internationally.
As governments try to keep up with these innovations, companies like Starlink continue to expand rapidly, often without meeting local legal requirements.
In the Brazilian case, Musk has already entered into a partnership with the federal government to install Starlink antennas in schools and hospitals in hard-to-reach areas.
However, experts warn that, Without adequate oversight, the technology could end up being diverted to illicit activities, especially in regions such as the Pantanal and the Amazon.
Despite the suspension of the signal in India, the unauthorized use of antennas in Myanmar continues to raise questions about the company's control over its devices.
Rebels and armed groups in that country have used the technology to coordinate operations, demonstrating that Starlink needs to reinforce its security policies to prevent similar cases from occurring in other regions of the world, including Brazil.
Technology: solution or threat?
While Starlink has been widely praised for connecting remote areas and supporting isolated communities, the crisis in India has highlighted the dark side of this innovation.
The ease of use of antennas, which can benefit underprivileged populations, also makes them a target for criminals, who see the technology as an opportunity to act strategically and without control.
In Brazil, where the technology is still expanding, the government faces the challenge of harnessing the benefits of Starlink without allowing it to become a tool for organized crime.
The crisis in India It is, therefore, an important warning for Brazilian authorities to anticipate and create mechanisms to monitor and regulate the use of these antennas more effectively.
What do you think? Is Brazil prepared to deal with the risks of this new technology? Or could the expansion of Starlink in the country end up facing problems similar to those in India? Comment your opinion!
The threat does not only come from smugglers, guerrillas, etc. The main danger is letting one man, Elon, command all of this. It is much more dangerous. He is becoming a very powerful man, with his satellites that not only provide internet, but go much further than that. His brain chip, with his rockets, cars, tunneling company, and robots, with which he wants to have more robots than the population of the planet by 2040, is moving full steam ahead to dominate this planet. We must be very careful and not accept impositions. Elon shows himself to be someone who intends to bring freedom, but the intention behind it is different. Don't be fooled. With all this power, if everything he wants to do is accomplished, then yes, we will be trapped. We will no longer have freedom. He will have all the information he wants. Those who implant this chip will be monitored and controlled through his satellites. With his robots, he will have the largest army that any country has ever had. He will come with drones, and they will not be ordinary drones, and he will monitor everything. Stay alert.
If there is only one intelligent man on earth in this area, it is time to review the teachings of universities.
Your comment is fantastic. They want to cut off communication in Brazil, which is zero for ordinary Brazilians, and they are posting this on the internet. Why don't they say that they are going to help Brazilians earn money like drug dealers earn selling drugs, so that they can have the same type of access, including to help combat drug trafficking.
The police are the ones who fight drug trafficking, my friend! You don't even believe that talk.
The fight must be waged by everyone. Citizens should report crimes and the location of criminals whenever they become aware of them, but in a country where the population admires and votes for criminals, governed by gang leaders and gangs, this will never happen. We are a shameless country. We have a lot to improve. I hope that before the planet is completely destroyed.
Because what you are saying simply does not exist. Moska's intention is money, capital, revenue; and for him it does not matter where it comes from: licit or illicit, legal or illegal, harmful or not, moral or immoral, disrespectful or the opposite, harmful or inverse, democratic or fascist-Nazi, empathetic or prejudiced-segregationist, environmentally impactful or the opposite, taxed or not taxed, original or adulterated, commercial or contraband, within the law or fraud-corruption, fair or unfair, blessed or infernal. He had money, he is in it and to continue being the richest and most powerful man of this century.
I completely agree with you, friend.
Rogues and authoritarian leaders are often mistaken for being intelligent, but they are usually smart guys who find ways to get around the rules.
Including the Portuguese language “it’s time” ****!!!
Hahahahahaha true!
Stop catastrophizing…
Science advances in many ways and forms, but if you don't want to be part of the world of cyber zombies, start by abandoning your cell phone, because through it you are monitored, influenced, induced, bestialized...
But if there has already been a problem, it is a sign that it needs to be reviewed. No one can be above the law and cause harm to others.
Anyone who doesn't have their own mind is really dangerous, I really need to work.
Look at the aluminum hat theory!
Elon's equipment is just one part of the "communication", the other part is cell phones and computers. So, how about banning cell phones and computers!? Since they "transferred" the problem to "Brazil", criminal activity inside prisons, using cell phones, has never worried the "government on duty"! Cell phones communicate through operators, why don't they curb the operators' actions? Oh yes, there are "fanciful purchase" scams simulating the security sector of banks. There is the Pix scam. Let's ban banks!? This smells like cheap ideology!
Your comment is quite pertinent, my city has several prisons, and the community and coups commanded from within the prisons are large.
True, some comments are an outrage. It even seems like India, Brazil, Myanmar…etc, are going to start in the “business of illegality and all types of smuggling now. Before talking crap, think…
Yes, that's right. Let's ban everything. Cars used to commit robberies. Trucks that transport drugs and contraband. Guns that kill. Politicians who steal public funds, money from school meals and schools. Let's ban airplanes that transport smugglers. Let's ban just for the sake of it.
The lacração gang is against Elon Musk, nothing more than that…
You solved the riddle. 😉
Well, let's be afraid and demonize Elon Musk because he has a lot of power. Let's ban Starlink because it allows drug dealers to communicate but not talk about the cell phones used inside prisons with the consent of the government. Bunch of **** hypocrites who only criticize the guy for cheap ideology.
Who said anything about banning? The word is REGULATE. In the beginning, the internet was used much more for scams and even more terrible things like pedophilia. This forced not only governments to regulate its use but mainly companies to change their policies. Take YouTube, Facebook, and others like TikTok and, more recently, X itself. Not because of pressure from governments, but because of pressure from advertisers. The irresponsible use of these technologies is bad for business. No advertiser wants to associate their brand with a company that allows atrocities and crimes. Of course, when a security and tracking system is created, there will always be an “evil genius” who will figure out how to circumvent this system, but the least we can do is make life difficult for ****s and force them to leave traces. Absolute freedom without responsibility is anarchy.
I fully agree
A kitchen knife was used in a murder. Ban kitchen knives!
By doing so, we will return to the caves as everything can be used for crimes.
The bias of the article is obvious in the rhythm of 'let's regulate social media' because it prevents ****. And the blame lies with Elon Musk and not with the candidates for dictator.
And the head will only be used to wear a cap (obligatory red).
A smart comment here 👏👏👏
He was competent enough. Just do the same. But it's easier to complain than to try to solve it. Long live Brezil.
Exactly that! The state needs to combat crime and use technology to its advantage.
Elon Musk only controls his own vocal cords to say “yes, sir, immediately.”
My friend! If you pay attention and realize, Elon Musk did not get rich and become powerful alone! He is an instrument of the American Government! And the only one who has satellite, rocket and airplane projects, with NASA AND WITH THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT! BUT WHY? WHY CAN A SUPPOSEDLY PRIVATE COMPANY HAVE SATELLITES FLYING OVER RUSSIA, CHINA AND THE WHOLE WORLD WITHOUT BEING AS VISIBLE AS IF WE WERE SPYING! IMAGINE IF THEY WERE GOVERNMENT SATELLITES! He is a South African citizen, not American, he has no conspiracy theories, and he is the ideal front man to stop the interests of the United States of America! The American Government injects millions into Elon Musk's companies SUPPOSEDLY! He is in the hands of the American Government and his power can be completely blocked solely and exclusively by the USA!
Yes, Alex. He holds the world record for losing money, and is even in the Guinness Book of Records. A guy who, due to his irresponsibility, should have already gone bankrupt. But with this injection of American public money through the partnership with NASA, it is almost impossible for him to go bankrupt.
Elon Musk is a FARCE!!! He is a Hacker and Account Spy!!! Wake up Brazil.
Your comment should be extended to the Chinese government's ideas, too.
Let's ban cars, because **** use cars to commit crimes!!!
How to avoid corruption on Earth? In public institutions, in politics, in justice, etc.
It sucks to live in these times!!!
LAO TSE in verse 57 is very clear in his book TAO THE THING!!
And he wrote 600 years before Christ!!!
It's better to leave the **** companies and the garbage from communist China that doesn't work, right? Without internet it's easier to silence the people...🤔
I'd rather be afraid of someone intelligent, who is producing and evolving with technology, than of a bunch of **** who coordinate this country, selling all the wealth at a **** price.
Technology is a good tool if people use it to do good.
It can be used to do harm, I'm also in favor of serious regulation because criminals can use it.
I think it's perfect against the **** and their allies, drug traffickers and land grabbers who are destroying the Amazon.
If only he had the ability, lucky him, governments don't invest in this area, then **** if they
Congratulations Elias for the insight of your comment. You are absolutely right. Elon is creating robots with artificial intelligence just like in the movie “I, Robot”. Has no one realized the global danger that this man represents?
He owns WhatsApp and for that reason alone he felt he had the right to implement artificial intelligence on your, my and all cell phones to access it as if it were a little gift for WhatsApp users. This way he can train his army of robots without spending a cent. I hate this guy.
The technology applied to the integration of remote locations delivers exactly what it promises in relation to the problem it aims to solve, however, whether it is the Indian government or any other that also cannot resolve its issues safely against existing threats, acts as it has always done, diverting attention from its inability to another Source.
Security is a problem for the government, which it is unable to resolve, or in the case of Brazil, it does not demonstrate (in the current government) an interest in taking effective actions that bring real results against organized crime.
A benefit that is being misused by a minority is not the source of the problems with criminals, but only demonstrates the government's lack of capacity to prevent such smuggling within its borders.
Just like here in Brazil, it is not possible to prevent arms and drug trafficking, territorial domination in favelas and other issues against criminals.
In the end, it is thousands of times easier to write a letter to a businessman complaining about his equipment than to solve his internal problems that help **** in the loopholes of laws that are inefficient, outdated and even unfair, because the real problem is within you, such as corruption, laws that benefit a few who have a lot and not the population as a whole.
Technology is not the problem, it's the person using it.
How about the following review:
Atomic energy was supposed to provide energy, but governments used it to create weapons. It wasn't **** who did it, it was the government.
Military missiles and restricted weapons are in the hands of ****, but they were exclusively made for governments.
You talk about government, but the government “obeys” a legislative power, which creates, alters or rejects laws, whatever they may be.
Threat, threat, threat, threat, threat, threat, threat, threat, threat, threat, threat, total control, total control, total control, total control,
Freedom, freedom, freedom. I have everything, I want everything, I can do everything. That's his life.
Of course, he just wants to be present everywhere, everything and everyone will depend on his authorization, Elon the new owner of the globalized and privatized world.