The Decision of the 5th Labor Court of Belo Horizonte Highlighted That the Employee’s Action of Presenting a Medical Certificate and Working for Another Company on the Same Day Broke the Essential Trust of the Employment Relationship
At the beginning of this year, the Labor Court confirmed the dismissal for just cause of a worker who presented a medical certificate to one employer and, on the same day, provided services to another company.
The decision was issued by the presiding judge of the 5th Labor Court of Belo Horizonte, Jésser Gonçalves Pacheco, who considered that the breach of trust necessary for the maintenance of the employment bond was established.
Worker Claimed Good Faith and Requested Reinstatement of Dismissal
In the lawsuit, the employee claimed that the dismissal was unjust and that the reason presented did not correspond to reality.
-
Retirement only at 70: men and women will have to wait until age seventy to retire in Denmark
-
Can a company require criminal background checks for hiring? Understand when the request is allowed and in which cases it can become discrimination.
-
Government submits a bill to Congress to reduce the workweek to 40 hours without a pay cut
-
Worker used company excavator to save colleagues trapped during flood in RS, was fired for just cause, but the Court reversed the punishment and ordered the company to pay R$ 20 thousand for moral damages.
According to her, the absence from work that day occurred because she had conjunctivitis and wished to protect a pregnant colleague from contagion.
With this argument, she requested the reversal of the just cause and the payment of typical severance pay for a dismissal without just cause.
The company, a foundation based in the state capital, argued that the former employee committed an act of dishonesty by presenting a medical certificate and, on the same day, working for another employer.
Judge Sees Breach of Trust and Contradictory Behavior
The magistrate highlighted that just cause is characterized by the serious violation of the main obligations of the employment contract, making the continuity of the relationship unsustainable.
According to him, since it is the most severe punishment applied to an employee, there must be clear and convincing evidence of the conduct that justified the dismissal.
In this case, the worker herself admitted to having provided services at another company on the same day she presented the certificate.
In a document attached to the case, she stated that, even while ill, she went to the other job due to the urgency of the demand and acted in good faith believing she would not cause any harm.
For the judge, this explanation does not dismiss the contradictory nature of her action. “Protecting a pregnant colleague from contagion may even be a humanitarian gesture, but the plaintiff, even being sick, still went to work at another unit,” he stated.
Request Denied and Case Archiving
Based on these elements, the judge concluded that the worker’s conduct compromised the trust — an essential element of the employment relationship — and upheld the dismissal for just cause.
He also rejected the request for reinstatement to employment without just cause and the payment of severance such as prior notice, proportional vacation, 13th salary, 40% FGTS fine, and release of guides for withdrawal and unemployment insurance.
The decision became final, with no appeal, and the case was definitively archived.

Be the first to react!