Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
If The Boss Does Not Pay The Transport Allowance, You Are Not Obligated To Work, Explains Lawyer Laura M. Dutra. Specialist In Labor Law Details What The Law Says About The Employer’s Obligation To Provide The Benefit
The lawyer Laura M. Dutra explained that, if the boss does not pay the transport allowance, the worker is not obligated to incur this expense to go to work. According to her, the law is clear: the benefit is the company’s obligation, and its absence can even justify the absence without punishment or the indirect termination of the contract.
This topic is central to millions of Brazilians who rely on public transportation. Although it is guaranteed by legislation, the failure to provide the transport allowance is still one of the most common infractions committed by employers, which can lead to lawsuits and compensation.
What Does The Legislation Say About The Transport Allowance?
Law No. 7,418/1985 and Law No. 7,619/1987 determine that the employer must provide the transport allowance to every worker who uses public transport. The benefit is not considered salary and can have a deduction of up to 6% of the basic salary, with the remainder covered by the company.
-
SpaceX sets share price at $135 and targets a historic $75 billion IPO to debut on Nasdaq with a trillion-dollar market value
-
While the world rushes to mine lithium from Congo and Chile, Brazil sits on one of the largest reserves and has barely begun to explore.
-
Heir worked at thirteen in an ice cream factory without revealing he was the owner’s son; today, at twenty-five, he leads the best-selling ice cream brand for home consumption in the Northeast, grosses almost R$ 300 million, has 145 stores, and competes with multinationals with regional flavors.
-
Lock manufacturer from Rio Grande do Sul invests R$ 150 million to surpass R$ 1 billion in revenue, create 200 jobs, and double storage capacity, while choosing Santa Catarina to set up a new logistics center and speed up deliveries in Southern Brazil.
Additionally, the Decree No. 10,854/2021 reinforces that cash payment is prohibited, except in exceptional cases, and that reimbursement must be immediate. This ensures greater transparency and prevents abusive practices.
What Does The CLT Foresee In Case Of Non-Compliance?
The Article 483 of the CLT establishes that the worker may consider their contract terminated if the employer commits a serious fault. The omission in providing the transport allowance falls under this situation, as it prevents the employee from attending work.
The jurisprudence of the Superior Labor Court (TST) and various Regional Labor Courts confirms that the lack of this benefit can justify the indirect termination, guaranteeing the worker all the rights of an unjustified dismissal.
Can The Worker Miss Work Without Being Punished?
Yes. If the company does not provide the transport allowance, the employee cannot be punished for missing work. The absence is considered justified because the inability to travel arises from the employer’s failure, not from bad faith on the part of the worker.
This understanding reinforces the principle of objective good faith, which requires balance in contractual relationships. Failing to provide appropriate means of transportation is a breach of a basic duty, disrupting the labor relationship.
What Rights Are Guaranteed In An Indirect Termination?
If the worker opts for indirect termination, they will be entitled to:
- Salary balance
- Notice period
- Proportional vacation + 1/3
- Proportional 13th salary
- Withdrawal of the FGTS + 40% fine
- Guides for unemployment insurance
These rights ensure financial protection and prevent the employee from suffering losses due to a fault solely of the employer.
What To Do If The Company Ignores Complaints?
The recommendation is to record all attempts to resolve the situation, whether by email, letter, or internal protocol. If the company remains silent, this serves as evidence in any labor lawsuit.
Cases already judged, such as in the TRT-15, show that workers who documented the lack of payment were able to obtain the indirect termination and all severance payments.
The stance of lawyer Laura M. Dutra brings clarity to a basic right that many employers still violate. The transport allowance is a legal obligation, and its absence can result in serious consequences for the company.
And you, have you ever been in a situation where the boss did not pay the transport allowance? Do you think it is fair that the worker can miss work or request termination in these cases? Leave your opinion in the comments.
Be the first to react!