Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
5 min of reading 
0 comments 
Shenzhen ecological bridge connects human movement and wildlife passage in structures with dual trails, enhances habitat protection and migration routes, and shows how a large city can open real space for biodiversity in the urban environment
The ecological bridge has become a symbol of a different urban conservation strategy in Shenzhen, southern China. In recent years, the city has begun developing ecological trails, constructing sustainable facilities, and applying refined environmental management to reserve enough space for habitats and wildlife migration routes, even in a heavily urbanized landscape.
What stands out is that this model has not remained just a discourse. The structures known as Kunpeng Trail bridges were designed with dual trails, separating pedestrian movement from wildlife passage. The result is the creation of a biodiversity corridor within the urban area, with records already captured by infrared cameras showing the use of these passages by species such as leopard cats and wild boars.
What is the ecological bridge that Shenzhen is using to reconnect biodiversity
The ecological bridge created in Shenzhen is part of a set of structures designed to allow coexistence between people and wildlife. Instead of treating the city as a barrier to nature, the project seeks to reorganize local mobility with distinct spaces for humans and animals.
-
The least visited country in the world is in the middle of the Pacific, receives only 9,500 tourists per year, and still holds the impossible record of being in all four hemispheres.
-
A Brazilian city is being encroached upon by the sea, and the municipality is forced to act due to imminent risk, with erosion of up to 1.85 meters per year, waves over 3 meters, and a daily fine of R$ 1,000.
-
With 30,000 volunteers and 1 million seedlings, China is combating desertification in a region that is 94% sandy and is trying to curb sandstorms with a green collective effort in the country’s northwest.
-
Mr. Eninho, at 67 years old, has lived for over 40 years on the same property in Delfinópolis, cultivates food, raises animals, receives tourists, and transforms simple country life into an example of happiness and tradition in the Serra da Canastra.
This concept appears in the Kunpeng Trail bridges, which were planned to function as urban passages and also as environmental connections. With this, Shenzhen aims to maintain migration routes and areas for wildlife movement even in an environment marked by buildings and urban infrastructure.
How dual trails for pedestrians and wildlife work
The most visible difference of the ecological bridge lies in the design of dual trails. In the released images, the structures show a walkway intended for pedestrians and, alongside it, a specific passage for wildlife.
In practice, this helps reduce usage conflicts and creates a safer path for different species to cross urbanized areas. The model also reinforces the idea that conservation does not depend solely on large isolated areas but also on creating functional connections within the city itself.
The numbers that explain the size of the initiative in Shenzhen
The strategy appears concretely in at least three highlighted structures in the Kunpeng Trail. The images show the Kunpeng Trail Bridge No. 1, the Kunpeng Trail Bridge No. 2, and the Kunpeng Trail Bridge No. 3, all integrated into the effort to create urban ecological corridors.
Another important point is the record of actual use of these passages by animals. Infrared cameras have already captured the presence of a leopard cat walking on Kunpeng Trail Bridge No. 1 and also wild boars using the same structure. This indicates that the ecological bridge is not just an architectural element but a route effectively incorporated by wildlife.
Why the record of leopard cats and wild boars is so notable
The presence of wild species using the ecological bridge gives concrete weight to Shenzhen’s project. When a leopard cat and wild boars appear in the images, the city moves beyond merely presenting a theoretical proposal and begins to show practical results in wildlife movement.
This type of record also helps demonstrate that the routes created are truly serving as passages for animals within the urban space. Instead of further fragmenting the environment, the infrastructure begins to act as a link between habitat and displacement areas.
What changes in practice when the city reserves space for fauna
By implementing an ecological bridge with dedicated passages for animals, Shenzhen attempts to reorganize the urban landscape so that it doesn’t function solely for cars, buildings, and pedestrians. The goal is to open up permanent space for biodiversity within the city’s logic.
In practice, this means ensuring the continuity of habitats and migratory routes that could be interrupted by urban growth. It also means treating environmental management as part of the infrastructure, and not as something separate from it.
Why Shenzhen became an example of biodiversity conservation in an urban area
The case draws attention because Shenzhen has been investing in a combination of ecological trails, environmentally friendly installations, and refined environmental management. Instead of focusing only on isolated green areas, the city tries to integrate conservation and circulation into the design of urban space.
The ecological bridge fits exactly into this logic. It transforms a traditional infrastructure element into an environmental protection tool, showing that biodiversity conservation can also be built into the daily life of large cities.
What this strategy says about the future of cities
Shenzhen’s experience suggests that urban growth does not need to completely eliminate nature’s paths. By creating structures with shared, but organized, use, the city shows a way in which infrastructure and conservation can walk hand in hand.
This model can gain even more relevance as urban centers need to deal with pressure for mobility, territorial expansion, and environmental preservation simultaneously. The ecological bridge emerges, in this context, as a type of solution that unites functionality, planning, and biodiversity.
The next steps of a model that goes beyond the landscape
With the Kunpeng Trail bridges already in operation and with records of animals using the passages, Shenzhen reinforces a policy that tends to expand the integration between urbanism and nature. The project shows that fauna protection can be incorporated into the city’s structures in a visible and measurable way.
More than creating a beautiful work, the proposal transforms the landscape into a biodiversity corridor. And this helps to place the city in a prominent position when it comes to thinking about new forms of coexistence between urban development and wildlife.
In your opinion, should models like this ecological bridge become an obligatory part of urban planning in large cities?
Be the first to react!