Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
1 comment 
A New Rule from GM Advises Owners to Perform Software Updates Within 45 Days to Avoid Losing Warranty!
Recently, General Motors (GM) announced a new guideline that directly impacts the responsibility of vehicle owners.
The measure, which started to be applied in warranty manuals for the 2025 and 2026 models, stipulates that the car owner is responsible for performing Over-the-Air (OTA) software updates within 45 days after they become available.
The decision, which aligns with trends from other automakers like Tesla, aims to ensure that vehicles operate with the latest security and performance fixes.
-
Hyundai sells an executive minivan that looks like a VIP room on wheels: Custin carries 7 people, uses a 1.5 turbo engine with 168 hp, 8-speed automatic transmission, and costs around R$ 157,000 in direct conversion in Vietnam.
-
The 7-seater Toyota that seems too cheap to exist in Brazil: Rush has a 1.5 engine, manual or automatic option, and a converted price close to R$ 81,000, while here families need to aim for much more expensive SUVs.
-
The 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero Dakar diesel shows 314,000 km and still draws attention for its reputation for durability; the seven-seater 4×4 SUV handles trails, but signs of severe use may conceal losses for used car buyers.
-
Peugeot publicly acknowledged the errors of the PureTech engine, which caused serious failures in hundreds of thousands of cars, and introduced the new Turbo 100 as a definitive solution, a 1.2 turbo tested for over 3 million kilometers that replaces the faulty belt with a more durable chain.
Failure to perform updates within the deadline may result in the loss of warranty coverage for failures resulting from outdated software, creating an important alert for drivers regarding the maintenance of their modern vehicles.
Software Updates and Owner Responsibility
GM clarified in its warranty manuals that the vehicle owner has a maximum of 45 days to install OTA software updates.
The policy is a landmark in the relationship between automaker and consumer, as it transfers a significant part of maintenance to the user themselves.
The updates, which are sent remotely, fix bugs, improve performance, and can even add new features to cars. In this sense, ignoring these updates can be risky, and as the new GM rule points out, can be costly.
The Analogy with Smartphones: A Paradigm Shift
To help understand this new reality, GM uses the analogy of smartphones, which also receive constant system updates.
Just as a phone needs updates to function optimally and securely, the same applies to modern vehicles.
The CEO of GM, Mary Barra, had already addressed the topic during CES 2022, comparing the automaker’s Ultifi platform to a smartphone.
Loss of Warranty: The Risk of Ignoring Updates
The central point of GM’s new policy is the consequence for those who do not follow the rule. If the owner fails to perform updates within the stipulated 45 days and a failure occurs as a direct result of missing software, the repair will not be covered by the warranty.
This represents a considerable financial burden for the consumer, who will take on responsibilities that were previously exclusive to the dealership.
The measure aims to encourage drivers’ proactivity, ensuring that the fleet is always equipped with the latest improvements and fixes.
A Look to the Future: The Evolution of Connected Cars
The automotive sector is constantly evolving, with vehicles increasingly connected and dependent on software.
GM’s stance on updates for its cars reflects this shift. The company aims to separate software from hardware so that new features and services can be delivered more swiftly.
The platform is also open to external developers, which could open up a range of new possibilities for consumers.
The Market Trend: GM Is Not Alone
It is important to note that GM is not the only automaker adopting this approach. Tesla, for example, already has a similar clause in its warranty terms, emphasizing that the responsibility for installing software updates lies with the owner.
The trend is for other automakers to follow suit as cars become more dependent on technology and software.
Thus, what we see today as a novelty at GM will likely become common practice in the near future of the automotive industry.
Já sei que não comprarei outro GM, porque não programam as atualizações do software no período da revisão e troca de óleo?
Decisão lamentável da montadora!!