In A Groundbreaking Report, Beijing Accuses Washington of Using “Double Standards” and Distorting International Law in Operations in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait.
The Chinese government formally criticized the United States’ freedom of navigation policy. In its first official report on the subject, Beijing claims that the American practice lacks a basis in international law. The publication marks a growing desire by China to challenge what it describes as “gunboat diplomacy.”
Groundbreaking Report from Beijing Criticizes American Actions
An official study published by China harshly criticizes U.S. freedom of navigation operations. The report, titled “Legal Assessment of U.S. ‘Freedom of Navigation’,” is the first of its kind released by Beijing. According to the document, Washington’s policy “lacks a basis in international law and severely distorts the interpretation and development” of maritime laws. The initiative was led by the Chinese Institute of Marine Affairs, in collaboration with various think tanks and universities.
China’s Arguments: “Double Standards” and Lack of Legal Basis
The Chinese report accuses the U.S. of creating its own legal concepts without validity. One cited example is “international waters,” a term that, according to the document, “does not exist in contemporary maritime law.” Beijing claims that American operations represent “clear illegality, irrationality, and a double standard.” Furthermore, the text criticizes the U.S. Navy for continuously entering the territorial seas of other countries to challenge the requirement for prior notification.
-
US targets Alibaba, Baidu, BYD, Tencent, and Nio by including Chinese giants on the list of companies linked to China’s Armed Forces
-
Iran accuses the US of blocking fan tickets for the 2026 World Cup, and the case exposes tension on the eve of decisive matches against New Zealand, Belgium, and Egypt.
-
Trafficking and militia create a parallel market in Rio, start to control who sells flour, chicken, water, and gas, block competitors, and put bakeries and markets under constant pressure.
-
The rise in interest rates in the U.S., to contain local inflation, is expected to accentuate the ‘flight’ of foreign capital from the Brazilian stock market, in addition to appreciating the dollar against the real, thereby also putting pressure on prices in the Brazilian economy.
From Navigation to “Military Threat”: The Chinese View
China accuses the United States of placing unilateral emphasis on military activities within its concept of freedom of navigation. According to the Chinese government, when this freedom is used to intimidate and pressure other states, it transforms into a “freedom of military threat.” The report asserts that American policy is subordinate to military and strategic purposes, which disrupts international maritime order and threatens regional peace and stability.
South China Sea and Taiwan Strait
The U.S. freedom of navigation program, established in 1979, shifted its focus to the Asia-Pacific region in the 1990s. In recent years, there has been an increase in operations in the South China Sea, where Beijing claims historical rights. The report highlights that China has been “the primary target” of these operations in the past decade. The document also indicates that the U.S. created the concept of “high-seas corridor” to justify its transits through the Taiwan Strait, which Beijing considers part of its territorial waters.
The U.S. Position and the Risks of Maritime Accidents
The United States defends that its operations are in accordance with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, even though it has not ratified it. The Pentagon identifies China as the main target among 11 countries in its annual report. The Chinese document, in turn, warns that American operations “frequently cause unnecessary friction” and, in severe cases, “lead to maritime and aerial accidents.” Tensions in the region are reinforced by other countries, such as the Philippines, which have expressed concerns about “China’s dangerous and coercive actions.”

-
1 person reacted to this.