After Disassembling Two Electric Motors from Tesla Cybertruck and Chevrolet Equinox EV, Team Led by Sandy Munro Identified Deep Technical Differences in Cooling Systems, Comparing Solutions Based on Rotor Movement and the Use of High-Pressure Pump, with Direct Impacts on Cost, Energy Efficiency, Mechanical Complexity, and Thermal Control in Different Operating Conditions
The disassembly of two electric motors by the team from Munro & Associates, led by Sandy Munro, revealed technical differences between Tesla Cybertruck and Chevrolet Equinox EV, highlighting how electric motors face the cooling challenge to ensure efficiency, performance, and durability.
Technical Disassembly Exposes Distinct Solutions in Electric Motors
After disassembling two electric motors, the team analyzed how each manufacturer addresses thermal control. Although it seems simple, cooling is one of the main challenges in the development of modern electric vehicles.
The goal is not only to cool but to keep windings, magnets, and housing within an ideal temperature range. This balance is essential to preserve efficiency, performance, and the lifespan of the components.
-
How much would a Toyota Corolla cost without tax in Brazil? A mid-size sedan priced at R$ 171,000 could drop to around R$ 96,000, showing how much the tax burden weighs on the most desired car of the Brazilian middle class.
-
An executive says that gasoline is stuck with technology over 100 years old, while electric cars already occupy the present and aim at the future of the automobile.
-
Chevrolet Onix Activ 2027 with a 1.0 turbo engine of 115 hp, fuel efficiency of up to 15.3 km/l, and 20.1 cm of ground clearance debuts for R$ 116,000 after 7 years, featuring an adventurous look and a 15-year warranty on the oil-bathed belt.
-
Small, automatic, and reliable car for around R$ 50,000: Kia Picanto combines economy, structural safety, good internal quality, and durable mechanics, but tests show that it makes sense mainly for urban use and not for those who frequently drive on highways.
The evaluated electric motors belong to Tesla Cybertruck and Chevrolet Equinox EV. According to engineers, the solutions adopted follow radically different philosophies to solve the same technical problem.
General Motors System Uses Rotor Movement as Driving Force
According to engineer Paul Turnbull, responsible for the technical analysis, General Motors opted for a system based on basic physical principles. In the brand’s electric motor, the rotor’s own movement drives the oil into internal channels.
From these channels, the oil falls like rain over critical components. This solution eliminates additional pumps and complex external piping, reducing the number of parts and simplifying maintenance.
As a result, production costs decrease. Additionally, by not relying on an electric pump dedicated to cooling, the associated energy consumption is lower.
However, the system has limitations. Since it directly depends on the motor’s rotation, its effectiveness may decrease in low-speed situations, such as in urban traffic or during prolonged maneuvers.
At high speeds, the oil may also move in a less controlled manner. This can compromise the uniformity of cooling during periods of high thermal demand.
Tesla Adopts High-Pressure Pump for Precise Thermal Control
In contrast, Tesla implemented a strategy considered more sophisticated. Instead of relying on the natural movement of the rotor, it uses a high-pressure pump that forces the oil through precisely designed channels.
The fluid is directed straight to the electrical windings and the magnets. This solution allows for more precise and consistent thermal control, regardless of motor speed.
Among the advantages noted is the possibility of using cheaper magnets. It is also possible to optimize efficiency by reducing losses from parasitic currents, which are responsible for generating additional heat.
The cost of this solution lies in the greater mechanical complexity. The pump uses battery power, and the hydraulic system adds components that can increase price and potential damage risk.
Two Distinct Paths to Solve the Same Thermal Challenge
The comparative study demonstrates that there is no single formula to ensure thermal efficiency in electric motors. General Motors prioritizes a robust, simple solution aimed at mass production.
This choice focuses on cost and structural reliability. Tesla, on the other hand, prioritizes precision and performance, even with greater system complexity.
Both strategies reflect each manufacturer’s identity in the transition to electrification. In a scenario where every watt counts, innovation also involves the ability to manage heat efficiently.
The analysis of electric motors shows that engineering decisions go beyond power or range. Thermal management is a central factor in the development of modern electric systems.
In comparing the two architectures, the team highlighted that both meet the objective of keeping components within the appropriate thermal range. Each approach, however, responds to different industrial priorities.
In the current context of electric mobility, temperature control has become an essential part of electric motor design, influencing energy efficiency, cost, and operational reliability.

-
-
-
4 people reacted to this.