Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
5 min of reading 
0 comments 
Astronauts return to the center of NASA’s strategy in 2027 budget proposal aiming for lunar landing by 2028, internal restructuring, permanent Moon base, and review of Pluto’s status.
Astronauts have returned to the core of NASA’s new strategy after Administrator Jared Isaacman presented the fiscal year 2027 budget proposal with the goal of returning Americans to the lunar surface by 2028. The plan was presented to Congress and relies on the Artemis campaign, more commercial landing tests, the advancement of systems for a permanent Moon base, and the expansion of American presence in space amidst competition with China.
The proposal draws attention because it’s not just about the space calendar. Isaacman also linked the new plan to an agency restructuring, criticized the history of delays and cost overruns, and advocated revisiting Pluto’s classification. The package combines lunar exploration, administrative reorganization, and a geopolitical leadership discourse at a time when NASA is trying to accelerate timelines without losing prominence.
What changes with the goal of taking astronauts to the Moon by 2028
The heart of the budget is the promise to return astronauts to the Moon by 2028. In the official text, NASA states that it wants not only to revisit the lunar surface but to establish a sustained presence, with long-term operations, science, and economic activity on the satellite. This changes the scale of ambition: the Moon ceases to be merely a destination and is now treated as infrastructure for the next phase of exploration.
-
Red alert for severe weather affects over 470 municipalities in RS with risk of hail, gusts above 100 km/h, and flooding, after heavy rain already caused water pooling in the capital and mobilized drivers due to damage and transport disruptions.
-
Venus will dominate the September 2026 sky with a brightness brighter than any star, visible even during the day and able to cast shadows on moonless nights, at a rare peak of luminosity that only returns to this level after about 19 months.
-
Goodbye conventional washer and dryer: Samsung is betting on a 20 kg Bespoke AI model with a heat pump, 7-inch interactive screen, smart sensors, app control, and an on-device consumption report.
-
A panel that transforms water and sunlight into green hydrogen without using electricity is drawing attention for eliminating electrolyzers, reducing costly steps, and paving the way for clean fuel produced on-site.
This shift also carries political weight. Reuters reported that Isaacman took over as NASA chief with the discourse of accelerating the return to the Moon this decade to avoid losing ground to China, which also has its own lunar goals. Thus, the space race is once again treated as a strategic competition, not just a scientific one.
The numbers that explain the pressure for a restructuring
One of the central arguments of the new administration is the extent of accumulated waste. In testimony to the Senate, Isaacman cited the 2025 assessment by the Government Accountability Office, according to which major NASA projects have accumulated approximately US$15 billion in cost overruns since 2009. This figure became the strongest justification for the promise of correcting failures and accelerating the agency.
To address this liability, Isaacman said NASA intends to rebuild internal competencies, transferring the work of thousands of contractors to civil servant positions. According to him, this could free up hundreds of millions of dollars for the agency’s central objectives, especially those related to the Moon and Mars.
How NASA wants to transform the Moon into an operating base
The 2027 budget makes it clear that the agency wants to begin work towards a permanent lunar base. The document talks about increasing the cadence of commercial landings, accelerating lander tests, and using robotic and crewed missions to establish this lasting presence. The idea is for the Moon to serve as a proving ground for systems, operations, and technologies that will later be used in human missions to Mars.
This plan involves partnership with private industry, transportation of equipment, habitats, rovers, and support systems. NASA also links this lunar expansion to the growth of a commercial orbital economy, with space stations developed by the private sector to take over functions after the ISS is decommissioned in 2030.
What else is included in the budget besides the Moon
While the main focus is on astronauts and the Moon, the proposal also preserves other relevant missions. The budget maintains the Nancy Grace Roman telescope and reinforces the Dragonfly mission, scheduled for July 2028, when a nuclear-powered vehicle will be launched to explore Titan, Saturn’s moon. NASA’s own document highlights increased resources to ensure this mission and the nuclear authorization required for launch.
Another important point is energy. NASA states that fission systems will be fundamental for sustaining a lunar camp for long periods, especially due to the intervals of darkness on the surface. This shows that the plan is not limited to astronaut landings but attempts to solve how to keep humans and equipment continuously operating on the Moon.
Why Pluto Returned to the Debate Amidst the Budget
In addition to the lunar package, Isaacman brought Pluto back into public debate by telling the Senate that he is in the camp of “making Pluto a planet again.” According to him, NASA is working on scientific papers to reopen the discussion within the astronomical community and, at the same time, give new recognition to Clyde Tombaugh, the American astronomer who discovered Pluto in 1930.
His statement carries symbolic weight because it connects science, national identity, and narrative dispute. The official classification remains in the hands of the International Astronomical Union, which downgraded Pluto in 2006, but the simple fact that the head of NASA raised the issue in a budget hearing has already transformed the proposal into something bigger than an accounting discussion.
What This Plan Reveals About NASA’s New Phase
Overall, the 2027 proposal attempts to sell a faster, leaner NASA, more focused on strategic results. The agency wants to cut historical delays, reinforce the American presence on the Moon, open space for new commercial partnerships, and maintain crewed exploration as a symbol of technological leadership. The official budget summarizes this vision in three fronts: deep space leadership, strengthening the space industrial base, and accelerating innovations.
By putting astronauts, a lunar base, Mars, orbital economy, and even Pluto within the same package, Isaacman tries to transform the budget into a repositioning manifesto. The challenge now will be to convert ambition into execution, especially after years of delays, cost overruns, and disputes over priorities within the agency itself.
Do you think NASA will be able to take astronauts to the Moon by 2028 and still reorganize the agency without repeating the delays that have marked recent years?
Be the first to react!