Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
7 min of reading 
0 comments 
Notifications sent by the app and email alarmed customers this Friday, but Nubank stated that the issue was resolved and that its operations continue normally
Nubank customers were surprised on the morning of this Friday, June 12, 2026, by a communication informing about an alleged extrajudicial liquidation of the institution by the Central Bank. Some messages also advised users to contact the Credit Guarantee Fund, the FGC, to recover invested amounts.
The notice caused concern because it was received through channels associated with the digital bank itself, including notifications within the app and messages sent by email. Reports published on social media showed customers trying to find out if Nubank had indeed been closed or if their funds were at risk.
According to information from Poder360, users shared images of the communication and questioned the institution’s situation during the morning. However, there was no liquidation, intervention, or suspension of Nubank’s activities.
-
It seems like something out of a movie, but it happens in Brazil: when the national team takes the field in the World Cup, even the power grid changes its behavior because millions pause their routine, turn on TVs, and alter energy consumption all at once.
-
São Paulo releases 50,000 free World Cup stickers in libraries and reading points, with 3,000 albums for those with an active registration, while collectors have a few days to pick up the kit and exchange stickers before the stock runs out.
-
Duplication works on the BR-101 tore through the soil in the Northeast and revealed 142 archaeological sites buried along the highway’s path, exposing the clash between modern infrastructure and ancient heritage.
-
Australia found more than 100,000 exotic cockroaches in a historic operation; the discovery of insects up to 7.5 cm and a scheme worth R$ 516,000 put Australian authorities on alert.
The company acknowledged that the message was sent in error and classified the episode as a specific operational error. The Central Bank also denied having decreed any measures against the financial institution.
Nubank attributes undue message to an operational failure
In a statement released after the repercussion, Nubank reported that the error had already been identified and resolved. The company said that only a portion of its customer base received the communication, but did not disclose how many people were affected.
The digital bank also stated that it remains with all licenses active and that there was no impact on the functioning of accounts, cards, transfers, investments, or other services. The institution also apologized to customers for the inconvenience caused by the incorrect notice.
The central point of the clarification is that the message did not represent a real decision by the regulator. Therefore, customers do not need to close accounts, transfer money hastily, or initiate any reimbursement request related to the episode.
Messages arrived through the app and email
The gravity of the confusion increased because the alerts did not circulate only through unknown profiles or social media chains. Part of the reports indicated that the warning appeared within the official Nubank app, an environment that usually conveys greater trust to the consumer.
Reuters reported that dozens of users claimed to have received the communication via the app and by email. The agency also noted that Nubank dismissed any connection between the episode and issues involving the protection of customer data.
This detail differentiates the case from traditional phishing attempts, where criminals send links through external messages to steal passwords or banking information. So far, there is no indication of invasion, cyberattack, or data leak related to the sending of the notice.
Even so, the episode could open up opportunities for opportunistic scams. Criminals may take advantage of the repercussion to contact customers, pretend to offer help, or request transfers, access codes, and personal data.
Central Bank denies intervention in Nubank
The Central Bank confirmed that it did not decree extrajudicial liquidation, intervention, or any other special regime against Nubank. Therefore, there is no official determination to interrupt the institution’s operations nor any procedure for returning deposits related to the case.
A measure of this magnitude would not be communicated solely by an isolated notification within an app. Decisions to liquidate authorized institutions are formally published by the regulator, accompanied by documents, explanations, and information about those responsible for the process.
The confirmation from the Central Bank also helps to dispel interpretations that Nubank might be facing a sudden shutdown of its activities. Accounts remain accessible and services continue to operate, according to the information released by the company.
As of the publication of this text, no elements had been presented indicating an immediate risk to customers’ resources caused by the erroneous message. The bank reported that it continues to internally investigate the circumstances that led to the communication being sent.
Extrajudicial liquidation means organized shutdown
According to the Central Bank, extrajudicial liquidation is a regime used to cease the operations of an institution and promote its organized withdrawal from the National Financial System. The measure can be adopted when a financial company no longer presents adequate conditions to continue operating.
In this process, a liquidator is appointed to assess assets, obligations, deposits, investments, and debts. Creditors are identified, and payments follow rules and priorities established by legislation and existing protection mechanisms.
For this reason, communication about extrajudicial liquidation immediately raises concern among account holders and investors. Unlike a temporary maintenance on the app, liquidation represents the end of regular activities of the affected institution.
None of this happened with Nubank on June 12, 2026. The term appeared in a message sent by mistake, but it did not correspond to the regulatory or operational situation of the company.
FGC does not need to be activated because of the message
Some versions of the incorrect notice mentioned procedures to request amounts from the Credit Guarantee Fund. However, since there was no liquidation of Nubank, there is no guarantee payment opened by the FGC due to this episode.
According to the rules disclosed by the FGC itself, the ordinary guarantee can cover up to R$ 250,000 per CPF or CNPJ, per institution or financial conglomerate, provided that the product is among the eligible instruments. There is also a global cap of R$ 1 million in guarantees received within a four-year period.
The mechanism is not activated just because a customer received an email or notification. The payment depends on an officially decreed intervention or liquidation, in addition to the submission and organization of creditors’ information by the institution responsible for the process.
Thus, anyone who receives contact offering immediate release of supposed Nubank amounts should act with caution. It is not necessary to pay fees, provide passwords, or make Pix transactions to obtain a guarantee related to the mistaken notice.
Recent results do not indicate closure of operations
The most recent financial data released by Nu Holdings also help to gauge the difference between the message received by customers and the public situation of the company. In the first quarter of 2026, the company reported a net profit of US$ 871 million, a 41% increase compared to the previous year.
According to the report published by Nubank’s international area on May 14, quarterly revenue exceeded US$ 5 billion, while deposits reached US$ 42.4 billion. The institution also reported having surpassed 115 million customers in Brazil.
The numbers disclosed by the company do not eliminate the normal risks existing in any financial business, but they do not support the information that a liquidation occurred. The official clarification and the denial by the Central Bank are the most important references for analyzing the episode.
Nu Holdings, the parent company of Nubank, has shares traded on the New York Stock Exchange. This also subjects the company to obligations to disclose relevant information to the market, especially in situations capable of affecting its operations and its investors.
Clients should be wary of contacts made after the episode
Those who received the message can check if the app is functioning normally and consult official support through the app itself. It is not recommended to click on links received later via WhatsApp, SMS, social networks, or unknown emails that promise to recover money.
The client should also not share password, authentication code, full card number, or facial recognition with supposed attendants. Financial institutions do not request transfers to “secure accounts” as a way to protect funds.
If any unknown transactions are identified, the recommendation is to temporarily block the card, review connected devices, and immediately inform the bank. If there is a loss or attempted fraud, it is also possible to file a police report.
The main guidance is to avoid decisions made under pressure. Withdrawing investments or transferring the entire balance based on an unexpected message can cause losses, especially when there are products with terms, waiting periods, or price fluctuations.
Failure shows the impact of incorrect banking communications
Even without affecting the platform’s security or the continuity of operations, the dispatch exposes the impact that a communication failure can have on an institution with millions of clients. Messages involving insolvency, blockages, or investment returns require strict controls before being sent.
The case also highlights how trust in the channel can influence consumer reaction. A rumor published by an unknown account tends to be questioned, while an alert displayed within the banking app may be interpreted as official confirmation.
Nubank stated that the problem was resolved, but it still needs to clarify internally how a communication with such sensitive content reached clients. Transparency about the origin of the failure and the measures taken to prevent new dispatches will be important to regain the trust of those who received the notice.
Be the first to react!