Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
2 comments 
STJ Rules That Property Purchased Before Marriage, But Paid During The Union, Must Be Divided Between Ex-Spouses. Understand How The Decision Changes Property Division In Brazil.
The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) has consolidated a ruling that has a direct impact on millions of Brazilian couples: properties purchased before marriage, but paid for during the union, must be divided between ex-spouses in the case of divorce. In practice, this means that even if the purchase contract was signed before the marriage, if the installments were paid with common resources during the marital life, the other spouse is entitled to their proportional share.
What The Law Says And How The STJ Interpreted It
The decision is based on the partial community property regime, which is the most common in Brazil. Under this regime, all assets acquired onerously during the marriage are included in the community, even if only one of the spouses signed the contract.
The Civil Code (art. 1,658 to 1,666) already provides for this division, but there were doubts when the purchase occurred prior to the union. The STJ clarified the understanding: what matters is not the date of the contract signing, but rather when and how the asset was paid.
-
The government will pay R$ 1.20 for each liter of diesel that Brazil imports and for the first time in history requires distributors to reveal how much they profit — those who hide their margins will face fines of up to R$ 500 million…
-
The pink ankle bracelet project for aggressors of women gains momentum in Brazil and raises an urgent debate about combating domestic violence.
-
A little-known rule in the Civil Code allows for other relatives to be called to the support action when the person who should pay first cannot cover everything alone.
-
Government enacts new law requiring ex-couples to share custody of pets in case of divorce, with rules for time of cohabitation, veterinary expenses, and loss of ownership in cases of animal abuse.
Thus, the installments paid during the marriage are considered joint efforts, and the corresponding value must be shared.
Practical Examples of Application
- Case Analyzed by the STJ: a property acquired before marriage had 70% of the installments paid after the union. The court decided that the portion corresponding to the marriage period must be divided between the two, ensuring the ex-spouse half of that fraction.
- Similar Situations: properties financed by Caixa or private banks follow the same logic. Even if the contract is only in one person’s name, if the family’s income helped pay, the asset is not exclusive.
Impacts For Couples In Divorce
This decision has a huge weight in property division disputes. Many couples believed that by buying the property before marriage, the asset would be protected. Now, the STJ’s understanding is that joint effort prevails over the purchase date.
This may increase conflicts in separations, especially in financed properties, where part of the installments drags on for years.
The Logic of Justice
According to STJ ministers, the measure aims to prevent property injustices. If the couple lived in communion, it is natural that both contributed to payment, directly or indirectly. Even if one did not make deposits, the mere fact of maintaining the household, caring for the children or forgoing a career is considered shared effort.
What Specialists Advise
Family lawyers warn that couples should pay attention to the property regime before getting married. Those opting for partial community must understand that everything paid during the union can be divided, even if the asset has prior origins.
For those who wish to fully preserve assets acquired before marriage, the solution is to choose another regime, such as total separation of assets, established through a prenuptial agreement.
Family Law And New Directions
The STJ’s decision reinforces a trend: to provide greater protection for the spouse who contributed indirectly to the construction of family assets.
This aligns with the Brazilian reality, where often one partner gives up professional life to support the family structure, while the other formally assumes contracts.
Property And Divorce: What You Need To Know
This interpretation by the STJ changes the game: assets acquired before marriage, but paid for during the union, are no longer considered fully private and now integrate the common property.
The message is clear: in a marriage under the partial community regime, joint effort weighs more than the date of signing the contract.
Esses caras são uns gênios mesmo hein. Uma.coisa tão difícil como essa somente poderia ter sido arbitrada pelos ministros. Parabéns aos envolvidos.
Na época me casei com meu esposo com separação de bens , devido minha idade de 15 anos E ao longo dos anos compramos uma casa Então se eu me separar dele não tenho direito a nada durante 39 anos casada. Ajudando sempre nas despesas de casa Muito injusto isso 😭