1. Home
  2. / Oil and Gas
  3. / TCU Points Out Irregularities in Partnership Contract Between Petrobras and Unigel
Reading time 2 min of reading Comments 0 comments

TCU Points Out Irregularities in Partnership Contract Between Petrobras and Unigel

Written by Paulo Nogueira
Published on 05/02/2024 at 21:57
acordo, convênio, pacto
Ministro do TCU Benjamin Zymler (Foto: TCU) – Todos os direitos: EPBR
Seja o primeiro a reagir!
Reagir ao artigo

TCU Identifies Governance Failures at Petrobras and Issues with Fertilizer Agreement Calculations with Unigel, Indicating Losses and Irregularities.

The technical area of the Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) identified irregularities in the contract for commissioned industrialization signed with Unigel, which allowed the resumption of operations at the fertilizer plants in Sergipe and Bahia. The governance failures at Petrobras and the distortions in the calculations that supported the signing of the contract were raised as concerns by the court.

The assessment of the oil company, mentioned in a TCU dispatch, indicates that the agreement will result in losses of R$ 487.1 million over the eight-month term.

YouTube video

Contract Between Petrobras and Unigel Raises Questions About Irregularities

Minister Benjamin Zymler ordered that the oil company, the Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), and Unigel provide clarifications regarding indications of irregularities pointed out by TCU technicians.

The auditors requested the precautionary suspension of the contract, but Zymler decided to hear the parties before making any decision.

Operation of the Agreement Between Petrobras and Unigel

How the agreement works: under the terms of the agreement, Petrobras retains the lease of its plants to the Unigel group while simultaneously contracting a company to operationalize the fertilizer production for eight months.

The oil company supplies the gas and receives fertilizer, becoming responsible for the commercialization of the products – along with the burden of a deficit operation.

In his dispatch, Zymler cites that Petrobras’s risk assessment indicated that the contract would lead to an expected loss of R$ 487.1 million, but the alternatives would be even more costly:

  • R$ 1.23 billion to resume both plants by Petrobras;
  • And R$ 542.8 million if the contract is not executed and the plants are not resumed by the state-owned company;

Irregularities Identified in the Lease Agreement

The TCU pointed out irregularities in the contract process, beyond the failures in the financial justification of the deal and the problems in risk qualification and quantification of the expected economic value of the evaluated alternatives.

The technical area identified a failure in Petrobras’s governance, as the agreement was approved by only one director and signed by an executive manager subordinate to him, without the effective participation of other higher instances of the state-owned company.

In addition, it considered that the oil company assumed risks with the deal in an unfavorable market scenario, through the signing of a ‘deficit contract, incapable of offering a definitive solution to the situation and without a clear demonstration of the benefits that would be derived by Petrobras’.

Source: EPBR

Inscreva-se
Notificar de
guest
0 Comentários
Mais recente
Mais antigos Mais votado
Feedbacks
Visualizar todos comentários
Tags
Paulo Nogueira

Eletrotécnica formado em umas das instituições de ensino técnico do país, o Instituto Federal Fluminense - IFF ( Antigo CEFET), atuei diversos anos na áreas de petróleo e gás offshore, energia e construção. Hoje com mais de 8 mil publicações em revistas e blogs online sobre o setor de energia, o foco é prover informações em tempo real do mercado de empregabilidade do Brasil, macro e micro economia e empreendedorismo. Para dúvidas, sugestões e correções, entre em contato no e-mail informe@en.clickpetroleoegas.com.br. Vale lembrar que não aceitamos currículos neste contato.

Share in apps
0
Adoraríamos sua opnião sobre esse assunto, comente!x