Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
The Federal Government Is Facing A Legal Battle Over The Decision To Temporarily Increase The Taxation On Crude Oil Exports.
The provisional measure in question, which instituted a rate of 9.2% on the tax for crude oil exports, was issued at the end of February and is the target of three lawsuits in the Supreme Court filed by PL, Novo, and oil exploration companies.
To defend its decision, the federal government presented an argument that was brought to the Supreme Federal Court (STF) by the Attorney General’s Office (AGU). Arguing that it is the Executive’s role to adopt policies “in the sphere of foreign trade policy,” the AGU defended that the increase in the export tax, as it was done, “is not subject to the incidence of the annual and nonagesimal principles, allowing for the production of immediate effects.”
The review of Petrobras’ fuel tax exemption policy was also included in the provisional measure, but it is the taxation on crude oil exports that has generated the most controversy and discussion in the political and legal arenas.
-
The government will pay R$ 1.20 for each liter of diesel that Brazil imports and for the first time in history requires distributors to reveal how much they profit — those who hide their margins will face fines of up to R$ 500 million…
-
Under kilometers of water, rock, and salt, Brazil hides a colossal wealth that led an official guide from the U.S. government to recognize the country as the owner of the largest ultra-deep oil reserves in the world.
-
Iran said that the Strait of Hormuz is open, but in practice only 1 non-Iranian oil tanker managed to cross in 24 hours — before the blockade, 100 ships passed per day.
-
Petrobras completes 1,300 hours of work and 15 km of subsea lines to connect the Búzios 90 well to the P-79 — the platform is ready to produce 180,000 barrels per day and is just awaiting ANP approval.
The Companies’ Arguments
The oil exploration companies have argued that the taxation on crude oil exports was made without proper consultation with the National Energy Policy Council (CNPE), which, according to the Constitution, is responsible for formulating national energy policy. This prior consultation is, according to the companies, a requirement for the issuance of regulatory acts that affect the oil and gas sector.
In addition, companies claim that the provisional measure was drawn up without observing the principles of legal certainty, protection of trust, and tax equality.
The government, on the other hand, argues that prior consultation with the CNPE was not necessary because the decision to tax crude oil exports is a measure related to foreign trade policy and, therefore, an exclusive competence of the Executive.
The Impacts of Taxation
The taxation on crude oil exports could have significant impacts on the oil and gas sector, especially since Brazil is a large producer and exporter of oil. Additionally, the measure could affect Brazil’s trade relations with other countries, especially those that import Brazilian oil.
The Role of the STF
It is up to the Supreme Federal Court to decide on the legality of the taxation of crude oil exports. The oil exploration companies that have filed lawsuits against the federal government hope that the STF will declare the provisional measure unconstitutional.
Meanwhile, the taxation remains in effect, and oil and gas companies continue to export crude oil, but with the additional burden of the export tax. The legal battle surrounding the provisional measure is set to extend over the coming months and is one of many challenges the federal government faces regarding the Brazilian economy.
Seja o primeiro a reagir!