In Times Of Scams, Instant Transfers, And Financial Disputes, Experts Warn That Saving Screenshots And Digital Evidence Can Be The Difference Between Losing Money And Securing A Victory In Court
With the rise of transactions via PIX and banking apps, the cases of errors and scams involving mistaken transfers are also increasing. In many of these situations, the screenshots and digital evidence are the main proofs presented in court to demonstrate the unauthorized sending or receiving of funds.
According to the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), digital proofs, such as screenshots and electronic receipts, have legal validity as long as they demonstrate integrity and can be verified technically. This means that a simple screenshot can help consumers prove a transaction and even secure compensation in cases of refusal of return.
Elderly Woman Loses R$ 36 Thousand By Mistake, Beneficiary Refuses To Return
A case reported by the CPG portal shows that a 71-year-old woman mistakenly transferred over R$ 36 thousand via PIX to the wrong account. When trying to recover the amount, she discovered that the recipient was refusing to return the money. Faced with the denial, the woman filed a lawsuit and secured the full restitution of the amount, in addition to the possibility of compensation for moral damages.
-
Bright red auroras are spotted in the skies of Japan, revealing much more aggressive hidden solar storms than scientists believed and triggering an international alert for the integrity of satellites in Earth’s orbit.
-
New York tourist finds a diamond the size of a human tooth after three weeks of searching in a volcanic park in the USA; the rare 2.30-carat stone became the third largest find of the year in the famous 83-acre crater.
-
China ceases to be just the “world’s factory” and achieves a record surplus of US$ 1.5 trillion while dominating batteries, electric cars, and solar energy, expanding strategic competition with the US and accelerating the transformation of the global economy.
-
Pelé’s favorite beach has ‘medicinal powers’ and was once prescribed by doctors in the 20th century; located between channels 4 and 5 of Santos, its waters were used to treat skin and nervous system diseases.
This episode reinforces the importance of carefully verifying all data before confirming any transaction. A simple slip, like misdialing a phone number or confusing a PIX key, can lead to significant losses. The court has recognized the right of those who made the mistake, but the process can be slow and depends on the existence of clear evidence—such as screenshots and receipts saved at the time of the transaction.
Screenshots And Receipts: The “Digital Proof” That Can Decide A Case
Saving screenshots and receipts issued by banks is a simple yet extremely effective practice. These files form what experts call a digital chain of custody, that is, a set of evidence that confirms the authenticity of the operation.
In financial disputes, courts analyze the date, the amount, the institution involved, the transaction code, and the destination account—all elements that appear in the screenshots and the PDFs generated by banking apps. If there is a dispute or refusal of return, this evidence is often decisive for the outcome of the case.
The Central Bank of Brazil emphasizes that PIX is a secure tool, but highlights that the user’s responsibility to review information before confirming the transfer is fundamental. The agency also recommends that all communications about errors or fraud be reported to the issuing bank immediately after the incident.
What To Do In Case Of Error Or Scam Via PIX

Whoever transfers an amount by mistake should act quickly. The first step is to contact the bank and request the opening of the Special Return Mechanism (MED), created by the Central Bank. This resource allows for the temporary blocking of the amount while the case is analyzed.
However, the MED is only applicable in cases of fraud or operational failure. If the transfer occurred due to the user’s own error, it will be necessary to seek a direct agreement with the recipient or turn to the Judiciary to obtain the return. In this scenario, the screenshot and the digital receipt become the main evidence of good faith and that the amount was sent incorrectly.
Increased Caution: Small Mistakes Can Be Costly
In times of financial immediacy, haste is the enemy of security. Confirming each detail, reviewing the amount entered, and checking the name of the recipient are steps that can prevent significant losses.
Saving screenshots and receipts, in addition to being a practice of personal control, is also a form of legal self-protection. In an increasingly digital environment prone to scams, this evidence can mean the difference between recovering money or facing an irreversible loss.

Be the first to react!