Second Special Court Decision of São Luís Removed Tied Selling, Denied Moral Damages and Refund, and Highlighted that the Consumer Was Aware that the Device Would Be Sold Only with a Cable, Without External Charger
Judge Alessandro Bandeira, from the 2nd Special Civil Court and Consumer Relations of São Luís, rejected a consumer indemnification action who purchased a cell phone without a charger, removed tied selling, and denied moral damages and refund, considering that there was no illegal imposition.
The magistrate analyzed the indemnification request presented by a consumer who acquired a cell phone without a charger included and, after the purchase, filed a lawsuit alleging tied selling practice and impossibility of using the device.
According to the records, the plaintiff stated that the cell phone became unsuitable for use as it did not have a compatible adapter with the device’s input, which would have compromised the functionality of the purchased product.
-
Brazilian family creates machine that transforms seawater into fresh water, produces up to 130 liters per hour, facilitates routine on vessels, and boosts family business along the country’s coast.
-
A doctor from Minas Gerais warns that sleeping with the fan pointed at the body all night is not as harmless as you think; it dries out the respiratory tract, causes mucus buildup, spreads dust mites, and can even irritate the cornea of the eyes.
-
Ecuadorian volcano at 6,268 meters is more than 2,000 meters closer to space than Everest, which is 8,848 meters, because the Earth is wider at the equator.
-
Public school students in the hinterlands of Maranhão create a bioinsecticide with neem and castor to protect corn crops, transform rural waste into biogas and biofertilizer, and bring sustainable technology to producers at ExpoSertão.
The consumer also argued that he was forced to buy an original power adapter from the manufacturer, a piece used to connect the cable to the outlet, seeking compensation for moral damages and return of the amount paid.
Manufacturer and E-commerce Defense
In response, the manufacturer argued that there was no tied selling, as the information regarding the accessories that accompany the device was clearly described at the moment of purchase made by the consumer.
The e-commerce, in turn, claimed passive illegitimacy, asserting that it acted only as an intermediary in the negotiation, without direct responsibility for the composition of the items provided with the product.
Understanding of the Court
In judging the case, Judge Alessandro Bandeira rejected all requests made by the plaintiff, concluding that there was no coercion or imposition by the supplier in acquiring the adapter.
For the magistrate, charging the cell phone could be done without the need for a specific adapter, allowing the consumer to choose between products from different manufacturers available in the market.
In the decision, the judge highlighted that the device could operate normally without additional purchase and that the consumer maintained freedom of choice, ruling out the characterization of tied selling, according to the Court’s understanding.
“The consumer knew what he was buying,” stated the magistrate, noting that the purchase execution demonstrated awareness that the cell phone would not come with an external charger, but only with the cable.
The decision was issued in case no. 0802842-69.2025.8.10.0007 and released with information from the press office of TJ-MA, which confirmed the complete denial of the requests made by the consumer.

Certíssimo o juiz
Que entendimento de ****! Daqui a pouco vão vender bicicleta sem os pedais… Carros sem bateria,moto sem guidão etc… Com certeza essa decisão foi comprada.
A porr@ da justiça do Brasil sempre em favor dos ricos. Pois se o cara comprar um carregador paralelo e danificar o aparelho o fabricante vai alegar mau uso. 👎