Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
3 min of reading 
0 comments 
Is Government Intervention Destroying the Economy? We Explore How Interventionist Policies Can Generate Economic Crises Through Excessive Regulation and Wrong Incentives, and How the Interventionist Cycle Creates New Problems Instead of Solving Them.
When discussing the liberal school of thought, it is important to consider how society has shown resistance to ideas that, although effective, are still not widely accepted in recent years. Considering the context of the financial market represented by the São Paulo Stock Exchange, BM&FBOVESPA, located in the Faria Lima region of São Paulo, a theory emerges: if you ask anyone in Faria Lima what the major problem faced was, the most common answer would be the lack of regulation.
This scenario leads us to reflect on liberal economics and how it is perceived by the general public. While classical liberals advocate that the market should be free from intervention, many argue that the lack of regulation is the main issue. However, it is essential to understand that economic liberalism is not about the complete absence of rules, but rather about finding a balance between economic freedom and efficient regulation. The liberal policy seeks to find a middle ground that allows for economic growth without stifling private initiative. The key is finding the right balance. Liberalism, in its essence, is not against regulation but rather in favor of intelligent and effective regulation.
Liberalism and the 2008 Crisis
Tom Woods’ book ‘Meltdown’ provides a rigorous analysis of the 2008 financial crisis, highlighting how government intervention and excessive regulation contributed to the collapse of the financial system. The dominant narrative at the time, supported by politicians, banks, and stakeholders, blamed the market and the lack of regulation. However, a deeper analysis of the facts reveals that political pressure to loosen lending criteria, primarily to help the less fortunate, created wrong incentives that fueled the housing bubble.
-
Experts say that China and Europe should join forces to reconfigure the global order, strengthen UN-centered multilateralism, and expand cooperation in trade, technology, and climate amid the US withdrawal and the advance of a multipolar world.
-
War with Iran halted 20% of the world’s oil, and now 70 supertankers are sailing to the US while desperate countries rush to Beijing in search of clean energy that only China can provide.
-
While China develops giant batteries and magnetic levitation trains, Brazil still hasn’t managed to get the bullet train between São Paulo and Rio off the ground, and now receives R$ 4 billion from Germany for an energy transition that the specialist says is behind schedule in its execution.
-
The US renews the license for the 759-megawatt Robinson nuclear power plant for another 20 years, until 2050, ensuring energy for 570,000 homes, nearly 500 jobs, and reinforcing Duke Energy’s plan to extend its 11 nuclear units.
The book highlights how the Federal Reserve’s low-interest policy, led by Alan Greenspan and later by Ben Bernanke, along with measures requiring mortgage agencies to buy more low-income loans, created a conducive environment for excessive risk. The pressure to increase affordable housing supply led to an expansion of credit, which, in turn, inflated the housing bubble.
The Fallacy of Excessive Regulation
The response to the crisis was more intervention and regulation, which only perpetuated the interventionist cycle. The idea that the market is the problem and regulation is the solution overlooks the complexity of markets and the self-regulating capacity of the free market. The Keynesian approach, which advocates government intervention to correct market failures, fails to consider that intervention can create new problems and distortions.
The example of the Cruzado Plan in the 1980s, which froze prices and set prices for meat, illustrates how government intervention can create unintended consequences. The measure led to a shortage of meat in supermarkets, as producers had no incentive to produce at a controlled price. The government’s response was to intensify suppression, with operations to seize cattle, instead of allowing the market to self-regulate.
Economic Liberalism and the Pursuit of Self-Interest
Liberal economics, based on Adam Smith’s idea that the pursuit of self-interest can lead to national wealth, is often misinterpreted. The notion that the market is driven by self-interest and greed ignores the complexity of economic decision-making and the importance of cooperation and entrepreneurial spirit.
Economic liberalism advocates for individual freedom and market self-regulation, arguing that government intervention can create more problems than it solves. The 2008 crisis is an example of how excessive intervention and regulation can lead to unintended consequences. By better understanding how the economy and markets work, we can promote policies that encourage freedom and self-regulation, rather than perpetuating the interventionist cycle.
Source: ©️ Market Makers
Be the first to react!