1. Home
  2. / Science and Technology
  3. / Generation Z Is Not Afraid of Being Laid Off
Reading time 5 min of reading Comments 0 comments

Generation Z Is Not Afraid of Being Laid Off

Published on 18/06/2025 at 09:39
Updated on 18/06/2025 at 09:42
geração z, demissão
Foto: Reprodução
  • Reaction
1 person reacted to this.
React to this article

Relationship Between Generation Z Youth and the Job Market Is Undergoing Changes With Greater Valuing of Mental Health, Less Attachment to Stability, and High Turnover at Companies, With Many Resignation Requests

The relationship between work, stability, and mental health is undergoing visible transformations. Generation Z, composed of young people born between the mid-1990s and the early 2010s, has stood out for a different stance regarding resignation.

One of the main points is the lack of fear of resignation, which directly impacts the traditional dynamics between employers and employees.

Behaviors That Stand Out Before Resigning

Among the most frequent reports is the refusal of young people to accept humiliation or toxic environments at work.

Situations that could previously be tolerated now result in immediate resignation requests or complaints.

Understanding of labor rights has increased, and many seek lawyers in cases of harassment or disrespect.

There is also a greater willingness to prioritize mental health, even if it means losing the job.

This stance, considered by some as a sign of independence, is seen by others as a reflection of social and economic changes.

Factors That Explain the Current Scenario

One of the aspects that help explain this situation.

Many Generation Z young people still live with their parents or have financial support from their family.

This reduces the pressure to maintain a job at any cost, unlike previous generations who, when laid off, faced immediate financial obligations like children, mortgages, and essential bills.

Moreover, the standard of living has changed. Marriages and children are happening later.

The number of direct dependents is usually smaller, which expands the margin for maneuver during professional transitions.

Informality as a Viable Alternative

Another highlight is the increasing presence of work alternatives outside the formal system.

Ride-hailing apps, delivery, and freelance services have come to be seen as real income options.

For some young people, these formats offer more freedom and earnings similar to traditional jobs, but without the pressure of a direct boss.

In this context, many evaluate that if there is no significant salary difference, they prefer to engage in activities where they feel freer, even without the same benefits guaranteed by a formal contract.

Reconfiguration of Stability

Companies have also undergone significant changes.

There has been an increase in hiring under the PJ (legal entity) model, instead of CLT.

Additionally, practices like mass layoffs, rapid rehiring, and changes in contracts have become more common in various sectors, especially in communication and technology fields.

This has made the bond between company and employee more unstable. The so-called “turnover” – staff turnover – has increased.

Professionals exit and enter frequently, and the culture of staying many years in the same place has lost strength.

Careers Built Between Companies

Given this reality, building a career is no longer associated with staying at a single company.

Today, it is common for a professional to grow by switching organizations, seeking better conditions or new challenges.

Promotion, in many cases, happens more quickly when changing places than when staying in the same position for long periods.

This behavior is interpreted in different ways. Some see it as a form of adaptation to the new market; others view it as a sign of lack of commitment.

Companies and Their Challenges

Many organizations report difficulties in retaining talent.

The most recurring criticism is that young people do not engage with the company culture and show little interest in staying long-term.

On the other hand, specialists point out that there are not always clear career plans, recognition, or conditions that encourage retention.

The disconnect between expectation and reality affects both sides. While young people seek growth and recognition, companies claim difficulties in keeping professionals engaged for longer.

The Role of Environment and Management

Besides remuneration, factors like work environment, management style, and respect for working hours are determinants for an employee’s permanence or departure.

Excessive pressures, unmet promises, and absence of open communication contribute to dismissal decisions.

Cases of companies that reduce rights, cut benefits, and still expect total loyalty are frequently cited in forums and social networks.

At the same time, there are reports of companies seeking to navigate this scenario by offering more favorable conditions, wellness programs, and real advancement opportunities.

Risks of a Bad Exit

Despite the nonchalance with which many from Generation Z handle resignations, experts warn of an important point: professional reputation.

In smaller sectors, it is common for former employers to be consulted about candidates. Therefore, maintaining a respectful exit, even in the face of difficulties, can prevent future consequences.

Unresolved conflicts, negative comments on social media, and exposure of internal situations can harm the professional.

The recommendation is clear: avoid fights at the moment of departure and, whenever possible, keep doors open.

Interconnected Market

In many cases, professionals return to companies they left, either by invitation or through new opportunities. This is facilitated when the relationship ends amicably.

The opposite is also true: misunderstandings can create unexpected blocks in future hiring.

Building a career, even if done through various companies, still relies on a good reputation, solid professional relationships, and ethical behavior.

Balance as Key

The change in behavior is not exclusive to Generation Z. It reflects a constantly transforming market.

On one hand, there are young people more aware of their limits and rights. On the other hand, there are companies trying to adapt to this new dynamic.

The balance may lie in recognizing that both sides need to adjust their expectations. Not everything boils down to the stability of decades past, nor should all flexibility mean constant rupture.

The job market is undergoing a transitional phase. Generation Z represents a new way of viewing employment and resignation, but it also reveals the fragilities of current corporate structures.

The old logic of permanence out of obligation has given way to decisions based on purpose, conditions, and respect.

This change does not necessarily signify a setback or advancement, but rather an adaptation. It is up to both employers and professionals to understand the new codes of this relationship.

And, above all, to find ways in which work is a mutual construction — with responsibility, respect, and room for growth.

Sign up
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
most recent
older Most voted
Built-in feedback
View all comments
Fabio Lucas Carvalho

Journalist specializing in a wide variety of topics, such as cars, technology, politics, naval industry, geopolitics, renewable energy, and economics. Active since 2015, with prominent publications on major news portals. My background in Information Technology Management from Faculdade de Petrolina (Facape) adds a unique technical perspective to my analyses and reports. With over 10,000 articles published in renowned outlets, I always aim to provide detailed information and relevant insights for the reader.

Share in apps
0
I'd love to hear your opinion, please comment.x