Discover How Car Design Impacts Automotive Aesthetics and Influences Consumer Preference, Creating Affinities and Implications.
What makes a person fall in love with one car and reject another? Often, the answer lies in the design.
When analyzing cars like the Beetle, Mustang, Fiat 500, and Jeep Renegade, it becomes clear that aesthetics go far beyond function. The design of a car can evoke memories, create identification, and even define the driver’s image.
More than just a means of transportation, the car also expresses style and personality. That’s why brands invest in striking shapes to turn each car into an object of desire—or, in some cases, immediate rejection.
-
Peugeot publicly acknowledged the errors of the PureTech engine, which caused serious failures in hundreds of thousands of cars, and introduced the new Turbo 100 as a definitive solution, a 1.2 turbo tested for over 3 million kilometers that replaces the faulty belt with a more durable chain.
-
Automatic cars become ‘cheap’ in Brazil, and models from Toyota, Hyundai, Nissan, and Honda appear for R$ 65,000 with up to 120 hp, CVT transmission, 482 liters of trunk space, keyless entry, and six airbags to tackle traffic without a clutch.
-
Honda revives a classic from Brazilian streets with a new name, TFT panel, and reprogrammed engine in the 2027 lineup; see the first impressions of the CB500 Hornet, which arrives with 49.6 hp, 4.5 kgf.m torque, 6-speed gearbox, 175 kg, and Showa suspension on Brazilian streets.
-
Without relying on an outlet, without a cable, and without the gasoline engine driving the wheels: Nissan created the Note e-POWER, a hatchback that always runs on an electric motor while a combustion engine works only as a generator, delivering to Japan a type of “electric without recharging” that Brazil is almost unfamiliar with.
The Impact of Design on Cars
When we think of cars, performance usually comes to mind, but design plays an equally decisive role. For many drivers, lines, proportions, and finishes can be determining factors at the time of purchase.
Simple elements, like the outline of a fender or the plastic finish on an SUV, can create affinity or immediate rejection. This kind of reaction shows that automotive aesthetics go far beyond function: it builds identity, evokes emotions, and directly influences the purchasing decision.
Jeep and the Straight Lines That Divide Opinions
Models like Renegade, Compass, and Commander maintain straight lines in the upper contour of the fenders, inspired by the classic “General Purpose,” a vehicle from World War II that gave rise to the brand.
Despite the historical heritage, the choice of design causes controversy. Many critics argue that the wheel arch should be circular since tires and wheels are also round. When this doesn’t happen, the detail can disrupt the harmony of the whole and create a negative visual impact.
Economy Versus Automotive Aesthetics
Another point of contention is the side doors of models like Logan, Sandero, and Duster. In them, the absence of a top bar separating the windows from the roof creates strangeness.
The reason, according to the columnist, is economic: the part was eliminated to reduce manufacturing costs. However, this solution creates an aesthetic impact. The result, for those who value design, is negative, even if it meets the proposal of affordable cars.
The Subtle Charm of BMW
If there are criticisms, there are also praises. Pincigher highlights BMW as an example of sophistication in design. Interestingly, the appeal is not in the famous “double kidney” grille, but in the prominent distance between the front wheel arch and the start of the door.
This proportion, common in rear-wheel-drive cars, suggests engines positioned in a “front-central” configuration and conveys refinement. The columnist notes that this choice is not exclusive to BMW; Mercedes, Porsche, and Jaguar also explore the feature, but the Bavarian brand executes it with mastery.
The Impact of SUVs on Automotive Aesthetics
Despite appreciation for some models, Pincigher criticizes the aesthetic standardization of SUVs. For him, the use of fenders with plastic coverings, justified as “adventurous” accessories, actually serves more to cheapen production.
This option, while functional, compromises aesthetics. As he explains: “It’s cheaper to frame the wheel arch with plastic than to invest in the stamping tool for the fender, making the folded steel finish inward.”
The Importance of the C-Pillar in Cars
Another detail of strong visual impact is the C-pillar — the part that supports the rear of the bodywork. Pincigher praises the Volkswagen Golf for maintaining this piece wide and clean, reinforcing the car’s robustness.
In contrast, models like Compass, Kicks, and Corolla Cross, with cut columns, convey a sense of aesthetic improvisation. Meanwhile, Tiguan, Tracker, and BMW X1 maintain elegance, with cohesive lines that enhance the bodywork.
Automotive Aesthetics and Consumer Preference
In the end, these examples show that consumer preference goes far beyond power or technology. In fact, car design evokes emotions, activates memories, and even generates rejections.
For example, a harmonious proportion can cause immediate affinity. On the other hand, plastic details can provoke displeasure. In both cases, the impact is direct on the purchasing decision.
Moreover, in an increasingly competitive market, automotive aesthetics stands out as a strategic differential. That’s why brands invest more and more in forms that enchant at first sight or repel with a simple glance.

Be the first to react!