Portuguese 
English 
Spanish 
5 min of reading 
0 comments 
Learn About Initiatives Adopted in Countries Like Ukraine, Chile, and South Korea That Increased Transparency and Reduced Corruption in Public Works.
One of the biggest challenges faced by governments around the world is combating corruption in public works.
Billion-dollar budgets, low oversight, and long timelines create an environment conducive to embezzlement, overpricing, and fraud in public works.
However, some nations have found innovative ways to increase transparency and engage civil society in monitoring these resources.
-
The village where two rivers run side by side without mixing in Santarém and Alter do Chão reveals some of the most beautiful freshwater beaches on the planet.
-
Brazil’s nuclear submarine with a speed 5 times greater than normal advances after nearly 50 years and R$ 40 billion spent.
-
A Brazilian island charges R$ 0.50 to receive visitors and prohibits any new residents.
-
Why was the Great Wall of China built? The truth that many are unaware of!
Among the most successful examples are the systems implemented in Ukraine, Chile, Germany, and South Korea.
Ukraine – ProZorro
After years marked by scandals and inefficiency in the use of public resources, Ukraine took a bold step in 2016 with the creation of the ProZorro system, a 100% digital and open platform for public procurement.
The name comes from a Ukrainian expression that means “transparent.”
The great innovation of ProZorro is allowing all stages of a public procurement process — from announcement to contract signing — to be made available online in real time, with unrestricted access.
The documents, amounts, competitors, proposals, and contract amendments are visible to any citizen, journalist, or organization.
In addition, the system uses data in open format, which allows automatic cross-referencing of information and facilitates independent audits.
The platform’s code is public, ensuring that its operations can also be audited from a technical standpoint.
ProZorro has become a global benchmark after receiving recognition from the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), the World Bank, and Transparency International.
In 2019, Ukraine claimed to have saved more than US$ 1 billion in public contracts through the competition generated by the platform.
Even with political instability and the war with Russia, the system remains active and has been maintained as one of the central structures for the country’s reconstruction, strengthening international confidence in its governance.
Chile – ChileCompra and Observatorio
Another outstanding model is the Chilean one. Since 2003, the country has maintained ChileCompra, a platform that gathers all government purchases.
More recently, the system was expanded with the creation of Observatorio ChileCompra, a technical unit dedicated to detecting risk patterns in public procurement.
The Observatorio uses data analysis tools to identify indications of fraud, such as shell companies, frequent contract changes, or unjustified changes in delivery deadlines.
One important point is that both citizens and journalists can access the system and consult b)
udge
ts, contracts, amendments, and suppliers. The information is made available with filters by ministry, city, value, or type of service.
The success of Chile lies in the combination of public transparency and data intelligence, allowing for preventive actions without solely relying on formal complaints.
Organizations such as the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and Transparency International have already pointed to ChileCompra as the most advanced system in Latin America in the public procurement sector.
Germany – Integrity Pacts: Triple Responsibility
In Germany and several countries in Latin America — such as Colombia and Mexico — a different approach has also been yielding good results. These are the so-called Integrity Pacts, promoted by Transparency International.
These pacts consist of a formal agreement signed between the government, competing companies for a project, and an external observer — usually a civil society organization, university, or independent auditor.
The objective is to ensure that all stages of the process are closely monitored and that there is a joint commitment against bribery, favoritism, and collusion.
By signing the pact, companies commit to following ethical practices, while the government guarantees total access to documentation for external monitors.
During the process, meetings, amendments, scope changes, or value alterations are supervised in real time.
In Colombia, the model was used in urban transport projects in Bogotá. In Mexico, it was applied in drug distribution programs. In Germany, the model has been traditional in large federal projects since the 1990s.
The Integrity Pacts do not prevent fraud on their own, but they act as a moral and practical barrier against illegal practices, in addition to increasing public trust in decision-making.
South Korea – Rewarded Reports and Anonymous Channels
In South Korea, the main innovation came from encouraging citizen reports.
The country created a platform called Clean Portal, which allows anyone to report suspected corruption anonymously. The difference: when the report results in an investigation or punishment, the citizen can receive a financial reward proportionate to the damage avoided or recovered.
This policy, combined with digital internal control systems and independent audits, has transformed South Korea into an example of good practices in public transparency in Asia.
Reports are processed by an autonomous anti-corruption agency, which has the power to recommend actions to the Public Prosecutor’s Office or block ongoing contracts. The model has already been cited as a reference in forums of the UN and the OECD.
One important point is that the system protects the anonymity of the whistleblower, encouraging engagement without fear of retaliation — something that is still an obstacle in many countries.
Comparison Between the Models
Although each model has a distinct approach, they all share some common elements:
- Active Transparency: Information is not just available but published in an accessible and useful manner.
- Civil Society Engagement: All systems allow for some form of public participation, whether in oversight, monitoring, or reporting.
- Use of Technology: Digital platforms, data intelligence, and open formats facilitate audits and reduce bureaucracy.
- Institutional Innovation: Each country adapted the system to its legal reality without copying ready-made formulas.
Challenges for Adoption in Other Countries
Despite the positive results, none of the models are “corruption-proof.” They function as risk reduction tools, but depend on other factors such as:
- Independence of control institutions;
- Good technical training of public servants;
- Culture of accountability;
- Political support for the continuity of the systems.
The export of these ideas to countries with fragile structures or a history of systemic corruption requires local adaptation, but experiences show that it is possible to improve the scenario with practical and tested solutions.
Seja o primeiro a reagir!