USA Expands List of Critical Minerals in 2025 to Reduce Dependence on China and Ensure Supply of Chips, Electric Cars, and Solar Panels
The U.S. government announced that critical minerals from the USA will have an expanded list in 2025. The document, developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and released by the Department of the Interior, will now include 51 mineral commodities, such as copper, lead, potassium, silicon, and silver. The goal is clear: reduce dependence on China and ensure the supply of strategic inputs for chips, electric cars, and clean energy.
The measure was published in an official draft that already guides investment policies, licensing, and even tax incentives for companies operating in the extraction or recycling of these resources within the USA. For experts, the update of the list shows that Washington is willing to accelerate reindustrialization and strengthen sectors considered vital for national security.
Why Critical Minerals from the USA Have Received Attention
According to Sarah Ryker, acting director of the USGS, the selection of the new items considered the sectors most exposed to disruption risks. She cited wars, trade disputes, and bottlenecks in shipping routes as real threats that could leave the U.S. economy vulnerable.
-
Cheapest cars for the elderly in Brazil: proposal foresees a high discount and can reduce the price of new vehicles by up to 25% for those aged 60 or older; see the criteria and what is needed to move forward
-
Brazilian government plans to invest 2.1 billion reais in Gripen fighters in 2026 while Saab presents in Sweden the world’s first two-seat Gripen F developed from a specific requirement of the Brazilian Air Force.
-
R$ 130 billion stalled: the environmental licensing that paralyzes Brazil while Paraguay steals our investments
-
Gaúcho earns R$ 304 million by renting 3,800 forklifts across Brazil: Toyota distributor transforms rental into an industry engine, replaces sales with 36 to 60-month contracts, and bets on autonomous machines to grow beyond the South in the national market.
In practice, this means that critical minerals from the USA now become a priority in mining, recycling, and technological innovation projects. The list serves as a guide for government decisions that may involve tax benefits to expediting environmental licenses.
The Dispute with China at the Center of the Decision
China is currently the largest producer and processor of many of these minerals, making the issue even more geopolitical. For Washington, relying on a strategic rival poses risks to entire supply chains, such as those for semiconductors, lithium batteries, electric vehicles, and solar panels.
By expanding the list, critical minerals from the USA become a symbol of the attempt to shield the national industry against global instability. Experts point out that this policy may accelerate partnerships with allied countries and increase pressure for supply source diversification.
The Direct Impact on Technology and Energy
The inclusion of new minerals means more focus on areas such as clean energy, automotive industry, and defense. Companies in these sectors will be able to access incentives to expand projects within U.S. territory. Additionally, there is an expectation that part of the production will be directed towards recovering waste, reducing exclusive dependence on traditional mining.
This effort is seen as essential to reduce bottlenecks in strategic chains, especially at a time when the race for electric batteries and semiconductors is intensifying.
The update shows that critical minerals from the USA are not just a mining issue but a broad strategy to protect the economy and national security. By aiming for less dependence on China and more productive autonomy, Washington seeks to anticipate crises that could paralyze entire sectors.
And you, do you believe that this decision actually strengthens the USA or creates new environmental and diplomatic challenges? Share your opinion in the comments — we want to hear from those closely following this dispute.

-
2 people reacted to this.